Cargando…
The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score
BACKGROUND: The Oxford elbow score (OES) is an English questionnaire that measures the patients' subjective experience of elbow surgery. The OES comprises three domains: elbow function, pain, and social-psychological effects. This questionnaire can be completed by the patient and used as an out...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21801443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-6-39 |
_version_ | 1782210900504084480 |
---|---|
author | de Haan, Jeroen Goei, Harold Schep, Niels WL Tuinebreijer, Wim E Patka, Peter den Hartog, Dennis |
author_facet | de Haan, Jeroen Goei, Harold Schep, Niels WL Tuinebreijer, Wim E Patka, Peter den Hartog, Dennis |
author_sort | de Haan, Jeroen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Oxford elbow score (OES) is an English questionnaire that measures the patients' subjective experience of elbow surgery. The OES comprises three domains: elbow function, pain, and social-psychological effects. This questionnaire can be completed by the patient and used as an outcome measure after elbow surgery. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the Dutch version of the translated OES for reliability, validity and responsiveness with respect to patients after elbow trauma and surgery. METHODS: The 12 items of the English-language OES were translated into Dutch and then back-translated; the back-translated questionnaire was then compared to the original English version. The OES Dutch version was completed by 69 patients (group A), 60 of whom had an elbow luxation, four an elbow fracture and five an epicondylitis. QuickDASH, the visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) were also completed to examine the convergent validity of the OES in group A. To calculate the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the OES, this questionnaire was completed three times by 43 different patients (group B). An average of 52 days elapsed between therapy and the administration of the third OES (SD = 24.1). RESULTS: The Cronbach's α coefficients for the function, pain and social-psychological domains were 0.90, 0.87 and 0.90, respectively. The intra-class correlation coefficients for the domains were 0.87 for function, 0.89 for pain and 0.87 for social-psychological. The standardised response means for the domains were 0.69, 0.46 and 0.60, respectively, and the minimal detectable changes were 27.6, 21.7 and 24.0, respectively. The convergent validity for the function, pain and social-psychological domains, which were measured as the Spearman's correlation of the OES domains with the MEPI, were 0.68, 0.77 and 0.77, respectively. The Spearman's correlations of the OES domains with QuickDASH were -0.43, -0.44 and -0.47, respectively, and the Spearman's correlations with the VAS were -0.33, -0.38 and -0.42, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Dutch OES is a reliable and valid 12-item questionnaire that can be completed within several minutes by patients with elbow injuries. This Dutch questionnaire was useful as an outcome measure in patients with elbow trauma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3162922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31629222011-08-28 The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score de Haan, Jeroen Goei, Harold Schep, Niels WL Tuinebreijer, Wim E Patka, Peter den Hartog, Dennis J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The Oxford elbow score (OES) is an English questionnaire that measures the patients' subjective experience of elbow surgery. The OES comprises three domains: elbow function, pain, and social-psychological effects. This questionnaire can be completed by the patient and used as an outcome measure after elbow surgery. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the Dutch version of the translated OES for reliability, validity and responsiveness with respect to patients after elbow trauma and surgery. METHODS: The 12 items of the English-language OES were translated into Dutch and then back-translated; the back-translated questionnaire was then compared to the original English version. The OES Dutch version was completed by 69 patients (group A), 60 of whom had an elbow luxation, four an elbow fracture and five an epicondylitis. QuickDASH, the visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) were also completed to examine the convergent validity of the OES in group A. To calculate the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the OES, this questionnaire was completed three times by 43 different patients (group B). An average of 52 days elapsed between therapy and the administration of the third OES (SD = 24.1). RESULTS: The Cronbach's α coefficients for the function, pain and social-psychological domains were 0.90, 0.87 and 0.90, respectively. The intra-class correlation coefficients for the domains were 0.87 for function, 0.89 for pain and 0.87 for social-psychological. The standardised response means for the domains were 0.69, 0.46 and 0.60, respectively, and the minimal detectable changes were 27.6, 21.7 and 24.0, respectively. The convergent validity for the function, pain and social-psychological domains, which were measured as the Spearman's correlation of the OES domains with the MEPI, were 0.68, 0.77 and 0.77, respectively. The Spearman's correlations of the OES domains with QuickDASH were -0.43, -0.44 and -0.47, respectively, and the Spearman's correlations with the VAS were -0.33, -0.38 and -0.42, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Dutch OES is a reliable and valid 12-item questionnaire that can be completed within several minutes by patients with elbow injuries. This Dutch questionnaire was useful as an outcome measure in patients with elbow trauma. BioMed Central 2011-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3162922/ /pubmed/21801443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-6-39 Text en Copyright ©2011 de Haan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article de Haan, Jeroen Goei, Harold Schep, Niels WL Tuinebreijer, Wim E Patka, Peter den Hartog, Dennis The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score |
title | The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score |
title_full | The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score |
title_fullStr | The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score |
title_full_unstemmed | The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score |
title_short | The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score |
title_sort | reliability, validity and responsiveness of the dutch version of the oxford elbow score |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21801443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-6-39 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dehaanjeroen thereliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore AT goeiharold thereliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore AT schepnielswl thereliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore AT tuinebreijerwime thereliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore AT patkapeter thereliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore AT denhartogdennis thereliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore AT dehaanjeroen reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore AT goeiharold reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore AT schepnielswl reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore AT tuinebreijerwime reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore AT patkapeter reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore AT denhartogdennis reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore |