Cargando…

The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score

BACKGROUND: The Oxford elbow score (OES) is an English questionnaire that measures the patients' subjective experience of elbow surgery. The OES comprises three domains: elbow function, pain, and social-psychological effects. This questionnaire can be completed by the patient and used as an out...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Haan, Jeroen, Goei, Harold, Schep, Niels WL, Tuinebreijer, Wim E, Patka, Peter, den Hartog, Dennis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21801443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-6-39
_version_ 1782210900504084480
author de Haan, Jeroen
Goei, Harold
Schep, Niels WL
Tuinebreijer, Wim E
Patka, Peter
den Hartog, Dennis
author_facet de Haan, Jeroen
Goei, Harold
Schep, Niels WL
Tuinebreijer, Wim E
Patka, Peter
den Hartog, Dennis
author_sort de Haan, Jeroen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Oxford elbow score (OES) is an English questionnaire that measures the patients' subjective experience of elbow surgery. The OES comprises three domains: elbow function, pain, and social-psychological effects. This questionnaire can be completed by the patient and used as an outcome measure after elbow surgery. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the Dutch version of the translated OES for reliability, validity and responsiveness with respect to patients after elbow trauma and surgery. METHODS: The 12 items of the English-language OES were translated into Dutch and then back-translated; the back-translated questionnaire was then compared to the original English version. The OES Dutch version was completed by 69 patients (group A), 60 of whom had an elbow luxation, four an elbow fracture and five an epicondylitis. QuickDASH, the visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) were also completed to examine the convergent validity of the OES in group A. To calculate the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the OES, this questionnaire was completed three times by 43 different patients (group B). An average of 52 days elapsed between therapy and the administration of the third OES (SD = 24.1). RESULTS: The Cronbach's α coefficients for the function, pain and social-psychological domains were 0.90, 0.87 and 0.90, respectively. The intra-class correlation coefficients for the domains were 0.87 for function, 0.89 for pain and 0.87 for social-psychological. The standardised response means for the domains were 0.69, 0.46 and 0.60, respectively, and the minimal detectable changes were 27.6, 21.7 and 24.0, respectively. The convergent validity for the function, pain and social-psychological domains, which were measured as the Spearman's correlation of the OES domains with the MEPI, were 0.68, 0.77 and 0.77, respectively. The Spearman's correlations of the OES domains with QuickDASH were -0.43, -0.44 and -0.47, respectively, and the Spearman's correlations with the VAS were -0.33, -0.38 and -0.42, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Dutch OES is a reliable and valid 12-item questionnaire that can be completed within several minutes by patients with elbow injuries. This Dutch questionnaire was useful as an outcome measure in patients with elbow trauma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3162922
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31629222011-08-28 The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score de Haan, Jeroen Goei, Harold Schep, Niels WL Tuinebreijer, Wim E Patka, Peter den Hartog, Dennis J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The Oxford elbow score (OES) is an English questionnaire that measures the patients' subjective experience of elbow surgery. The OES comprises three domains: elbow function, pain, and social-psychological effects. This questionnaire can be completed by the patient and used as an outcome measure after elbow surgery. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the Dutch version of the translated OES for reliability, validity and responsiveness with respect to patients after elbow trauma and surgery. METHODS: The 12 items of the English-language OES were translated into Dutch and then back-translated; the back-translated questionnaire was then compared to the original English version. The OES Dutch version was completed by 69 patients (group A), 60 of whom had an elbow luxation, four an elbow fracture and five an epicondylitis. QuickDASH, the visual analogue pain scale (VAS) and the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) were also completed to examine the convergent validity of the OES in group A. To calculate the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of the OES, this questionnaire was completed three times by 43 different patients (group B). An average of 52 days elapsed between therapy and the administration of the third OES (SD = 24.1). RESULTS: The Cronbach's α coefficients for the function, pain and social-psychological domains were 0.90, 0.87 and 0.90, respectively. The intra-class correlation coefficients for the domains were 0.87 for function, 0.89 for pain and 0.87 for social-psychological. The standardised response means for the domains were 0.69, 0.46 and 0.60, respectively, and the minimal detectable changes were 27.6, 21.7 and 24.0, respectively. The convergent validity for the function, pain and social-psychological domains, which were measured as the Spearman's correlation of the OES domains with the MEPI, were 0.68, 0.77 and 0.77, respectively. The Spearman's correlations of the OES domains with QuickDASH were -0.43, -0.44 and -0.47, respectively, and the Spearman's correlations with the VAS were -0.33, -0.38 and -0.42, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Dutch OES is a reliable and valid 12-item questionnaire that can be completed within several minutes by patients with elbow injuries. This Dutch questionnaire was useful as an outcome measure in patients with elbow trauma. BioMed Central 2011-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3162922/ /pubmed/21801443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-6-39 Text en Copyright ©2011 de Haan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Haan, Jeroen
Goei, Harold
Schep, Niels WL
Tuinebreijer, Wim E
Patka, Peter
den Hartog, Dennis
The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score
title The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score
title_full The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score
title_fullStr The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score
title_full_unstemmed The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score
title_short The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score
title_sort reliability, validity and responsiveness of the dutch version of the oxford elbow score
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3162922/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21801443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-6-39
work_keys_str_mv AT dehaanjeroen thereliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT goeiharold thereliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT schepnielswl thereliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT tuinebreijerwime thereliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT patkapeter thereliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT denhartogdennis thereliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT dehaanjeroen reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT goeiharold reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT schepnielswl reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT tuinebreijerwime reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT patkapeter reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore
AT denhartogdennis reliabilityvalidityandresponsivenessofthedutchversionoftheoxfordelbowscore