Cargando…

Occupational therapy and return to work: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this review study was to gather evidence on the effectiveness in terms of return to work (RTW) of occupational therapy interventions (OTIs) in rehabilitation patients with non-congenital disorders. A secondary aim was to be able to select the most efficient OTI. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Désiron, Huguette AM, de Rijk, Angelique, Van Hoof, Elke, Donceel, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3163552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21810228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-615
_version_ 1782210959746531328
author Désiron, Huguette AM
de Rijk, Angelique
Van Hoof, Elke
Donceel, Peter
author_facet Désiron, Huguette AM
de Rijk, Angelique
Van Hoof, Elke
Donceel, Peter
author_sort Désiron, Huguette AM
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this review study was to gather evidence on the effectiveness in terms of return to work (RTW) of occupational therapy interventions (OTIs) in rehabilitation patients with non-congenital disorders. A secondary aim was to be able to select the most efficient OTI. METHODS: A systematic literature review of peer-reviewed papers was conducted using electronic databases (Cinahl, Cochrane Library, Ebsco, Medline (Pubmed), and PsycInfo). The search focussed on randomised controlled trials and cohort studies published in English from 1980 until September 2010. Scientific validity of the studies was assessed. RESULTS: Starting from 1532 papers with pertinent titles, six studies met the quality criteria. Results show systematic reviewing of OTIs on RTW was challenging due to varying populations, different outcome measures, and poor descriptions of methodology. There is evidence that OTIs as part of rehabilitation programs, increase RTW rates, although the methodological evidence of most studies is weak. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the selected papers indicated that OTIs positively influence RTW; two studies described precisely what the content of their OTI was. In order to identify the added value of OTIs on RTW, studies with well-defined OT intervention protocols are necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3163552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31635522011-08-30 Occupational therapy and return to work: a systematic literature review Désiron, Huguette AM de Rijk, Angelique Van Hoof, Elke Donceel, Peter BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this review study was to gather evidence on the effectiveness in terms of return to work (RTW) of occupational therapy interventions (OTIs) in rehabilitation patients with non-congenital disorders. A secondary aim was to be able to select the most efficient OTI. METHODS: A systematic literature review of peer-reviewed papers was conducted using electronic databases (Cinahl, Cochrane Library, Ebsco, Medline (Pubmed), and PsycInfo). The search focussed on randomised controlled trials and cohort studies published in English from 1980 until September 2010. Scientific validity of the studies was assessed. RESULTS: Starting from 1532 papers with pertinent titles, six studies met the quality criteria. Results show systematic reviewing of OTIs on RTW was challenging due to varying populations, different outcome measures, and poor descriptions of methodology. There is evidence that OTIs as part of rehabilitation programs, increase RTW rates, although the methodological evidence of most studies is weak. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the selected papers indicated that OTIs positively influence RTW; two studies described precisely what the content of their OTI was. In order to identify the added value of OTIs on RTW, studies with well-defined OT intervention protocols are necessary. BioMed Central 2011-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3163552/ /pubmed/21810228 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-615 Text en Copyright ©2011 Désiron et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Désiron, Huguette AM
de Rijk, Angelique
Van Hoof, Elke
Donceel, Peter
Occupational therapy and return to work: a systematic literature review
title Occupational therapy and return to work: a systematic literature review
title_full Occupational therapy and return to work: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Occupational therapy and return to work: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Occupational therapy and return to work: a systematic literature review
title_short Occupational therapy and return to work: a systematic literature review
title_sort occupational therapy and return to work: a systematic literature review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3163552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21810228
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-615
work_keys_str_mv AT desironhuguetteam occupationaltherapyandreturntoworkasystematicliteraturereview
AT derijkangelique occupationaltherapyandreturntoworkasystematicliteraturereview
AT vanhoofelke occupationaltherapyandreturntoworkasystematicliteraturereview
AT donceelpeter occupationaltherapyandreturntoworkasystematicliteraturereview