Cargando…

New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone

BACKGROUND: An advantage of randomised response and non-randomised models investigating sensitive issues arises from the characteristic that individual answers about discriminating behaviour cannot be linked to the individuals. This study proposed a new fuzzy response model coined 'Single Sampl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Petróczi, Andrea, Nepusz, Tamás, Cross, Paul, Taft, Helen, Shah, Syeda, Deshmukh, Nawed, Schaffer, Jay, Shane, Maryann, Adesanwo, Christiana, Barker, James, Naughton, Declan P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3163613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21812979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-6-20
_version_ 1782210969974341632
author Petróczi, Andrea
Nepusz, Tamás
Cross, Paul
Taft, Helen
Shah, Syeda
Deshmukh, Nawed
Schaffer, Jay
Shane, Maryann
Adesanwo, Christiana
Barker, James
Naughton, Declan P
author_facet Petróczi, Andrea
Nepusz, Tamás
Cross, Paul
Taft, Helen
Shah, Syeda
Deshmukh, Nawed
Schaffer, Jay
Shane, Maryann
Adesanwo, Christiana
Barker, James
Naughton, Declan P
author_sort Petróczi, Andrea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An advantage of randomised response and non-randomised models investigating sensitive issues arises from the characteristic that individual answers about discriminating behaviour cannot be linked to the individuals. This study proposed a new fuzzy response model coined 'Single Sample Count' (SSC) to estimate prevalence of discriminating or embarrassing behaviour in epidemiologic studies. METHODS: The SSC was tested and compared to the established Forced Response (FR) model estimating Mephedrone use. Estimations from both SSC and FR were then corroborated with qualitative hair screening data. Volunteers (n = 318, mean age = 22.69 ± 5.87, 59.1% male) in a rural area in north Wales and a metropolitan area in England completed a questionnaire containing the SSC and FR in alternating order, and four questions canvassing opinions and beliefs regarding Mephedrone. Hair samples were screened for Mephedrone using a qualitative Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry method. RESULTS: The SSC algorithm improves upon the existing item count techniques by utilizing known population distributions and embeds the sensitive question among four unrelated innocuous questions with binomial distribution. Respondents are only asked to indicate how many without revealing which ones are true. The two probability models yielded similar estimates with the FR being between 2.6% - 15.0%; whereas the new SSC ranged between 0% - 10%. The six positive hair samples indicated that the prevalence rate in the sample was at least 4%. The close proximity of these estimates provides evidence to support the validity of the new SSC model. Using simulations, the recommended sample sizes as the function of the statistical power and expected prevalence rate were calculated. CONCLUSION: The main advantages of the SSC over other indirect methods are: simple administration, completion and calculation, maximum use of the data and good face validity for all respondents. Owing to the key feature that respondents are not required to answer the sensitive question directly, coupled with the absence of forced response or obvious self-protective response strategy, the SSC has the potential to cut across self-protective barriers more effectively than other estimation models. This elegantly simple, quick and effective method can be successfully employed in public health research investigating compromising behaviours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3163613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31636132011-08-30 New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone Petróczi, Andrea Nepusz, Tamás Cross, Paul Taft, Helen Shah, Syeda Deshmukh, Nawed Schaffer, Jay Shane, Maryann Adesanwo, Christiana Barker, James Naughton, Declan P Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Methodology BACKGROUND: An advantage of randomised response and non-randomised models investigating sensitive issues arises from the characteristic that individual answers about discriminating behaviour cannot be linked to the individuals. This study proposed a new fuzzy response model coined 'Single Sample Count' (SSC) to estimate prevalence of discriminating or embarrassing behaviour in epidemiologic studies. METHODS: The SSC was tested and compared to the established Forced Response (FR) model estimating Mephedrone use. Estimations from both SSC and FR were then corroborated with qualitative hair screening data. Volunteers (n = 318, mean age = 22.69 ± 5.87, 59.1% male) in a rural area in north Wales and a metropolitan area in England completed a questionnaire containing the SSC and FR in alternating order, and four questions canvassing opinions and beliefs regarding Mephedrone. Hair samples were screened for Mephedrone using a qualitative Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry method. RESULTS: The SSC algorithm improves upon the existing item count techniques by utilizing known population distributions and embeds the sensitive question among four unrelated innocuous questions with binomial distribution. Respondents are only asked to indicate how many without revealing which ones are true. The two probability models yielded similar estimates with the FR being between 2.6% - 15.0%; whereas the new SSC ranged between 0% - 10%. The six positive hair samples indicated that the prevalence rate in the sample was at least 4%. The close proximity of these estimates provides evidence to support the validity of the new SSC model. Using simulations, the recommended sample sizes as the function of the statistical power and expected prevalence rate were calculated. CONCLUSION: The main advantages of the SSC over other indirect methods are: simple administration, completion and calculation, maximum use of the data and good face validity for all respondents. Owing to the key feature that respondents are not required to answer the sensitive question directly, coupled with the absence of forced response or obvious self-protective response strategy, the SSC has the potential to cut across self-protective barriers more effectively than other estimation models. This elegantly simple, quick and effective method can be successfully employed in public health research investigating compromising behaviours. BioMed Central 2011-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3163613/ /pubmed/21812979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-6-20 Text en Copyright ©2011 Petróczi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Petróczi, Andrea
Nepusz, Tamás
Cross, Paul
Taft, Helen
Shah, Syeda
Deshmukh, Nawed
Schaffer, Jay
Shane, Maryann
Adesanwo, Christiana
Barker, James
Naughton, Declan P
New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone
title New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone
title_full New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone
title_fullStr New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone
title_full_unstemmed New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone
title_short New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone
title_sort new non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3163613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21812979
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-6-20
work_keys_str_mv AT petrocziandrea newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone
AT nepusztamas newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone
AT crosspaul newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone
AT tafthelen newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone
AT shahsyeda newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone
AT deshmukhnawed newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone
AT schafferjay newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone
AT shanemaryann newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone
AT adesanwochristiana newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone
AT barkerjames newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone
AT naughtondeclanp newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone