Cargando…
New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone
BACKGROUND: An advantage of randomised response and non-randomised models investigating sensitive issues arises from the characteristic that individual answers about discriminating behaviour cannot be linked to the individuals. This study proposed a new fuzzy response model coined 'Single Sampl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3163613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21812979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-6-20 |
_version_ | 1782210969974341632 |
---|---|
author | Petróczi, Andrea Nepusz, Tamás Cross, Paul Taft, Helen Shah, Syeda Deshmukh, Nawed Schaffer, Jay Shane, Maryann Adesanwo, Christiana Barker, James Naughton, Declan P |
author_facet | Petróczi, Andrea Nepusz, Tamás Cross, Paul Taft, Helen Shah, Syeda Deshmukh, Nawed Schaffer, Jay Shane, Maryann Adesanwo, Christiana Barker, James Naughton, Declan P |
author_sort | Petróczi, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An advantage of randomised response and non-randomised models investigating sensitive issues arises from the characteristic that individual answers about discriminating behaviour cannot be linked to the individuals. This study proposed a new fuzzy response model coined 'Single Sample Count' (SSC) to estimate prevalence of discriminating or embarrassing behaviour in epidemiologic studies. METHODS: The SSC was tested and compared to the established Forced Response (FR) model estimating Mephedrone use. Estimations from both SSC and FR were then corroborated with qualitative hair screening data. Volunteers (n = 318, mean age = 22.69 ± 5.87, 59.1% male) in a rural area in north Wales and a metropolitan area in England completed a questionnaire containing the SSC and FR in alternating order, and four questions canvassing opinions and beliefs regarding Mephedrone. Hair samples were screened for Mephedrone using a qualitative Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry method. RESULTS: The SSC algorithm improves upon the existing item count techniques by utilizing known population distributions and embeds the sensitive question among four unrelated innocuous questions with binomial distribution. Respondents are only asked to indicate how many without revealing which ones are true. The two probability models yielded similar estimates with the FR being between 2.6% - 15.0%; whereas the new SSC ranged between 0% - 10%. The six positive hair samples indicated that the prevalence rate in the sample was at least 4%. The close proximity of these estimates provides evidence to support the validity of the new SSC model. Using simulations, the recommended sample sizes as the function of the statistical power and expected prevalence rate were calculated. CONCLUSION: The main advantages of the SSC over other indirect methods are: simple administration, completion and calculation, maximum use of the data and good face validity for all respondents. Owing to the key feature that respondents are not required to answer the sensitive question directly, coupled with the absence of forced response or obvious self-protective response strategy, the SSC has the potential to cut across self-protective barriers more effectively than other estimation models. This elegantly simple, quick and effective method can be successfully employed in public health research investigating compromising behaviours. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3163613 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31636132011-08-30 New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone Petróczi, Andrea Nepusz, Tamás Cross, Paul Taft, Helen Shah, Syeda Deshmukh, Nawed Schaffer, Jay Shane, Maryann Adesanwo, Christiana Barker, James Naughton, Declan P Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy Methodology BACKGROUND: An advantage of randomised response and non-randomised models investigating sensitive issues arises from the characteristic that individual answers about discriminating behaviour cannot be linked to the individuals. This study proposed a new fuzzy response model coined 'Single Sample Count' (SSC) to estimate prevalence of discriminating or embarrassing behaviour in epidemiologic studies. METHODS: The SSC was tested and compared to the established Forced Response (FR) model estimating Mephedrone use. Estimations from both SSC and FR were then corroborated with qualitative hair screening data. Volunteers (n = 318, mean age = 22.69 ± 5.87, 59.1% male) in a rural area in north Wales and a metropolitan area in England completed a questionnaire containing the SSC and FR in alternating order, and four questions canvassing opinions and beliefs regarding Mephedrone. Hair samples were screened for Mephedrone using a qualitative Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry method. RESULTS: The SSC algorithm improves upon the existing item count techniques by utilizing known population distributions and embeds the sensitive question among four unrelated innocuous questions with binomial distribution. Respondents are only asked to indicate how many without revealing which ones are true. The two probability models yielded similar estimates with the FR being between 2.6% - 15.0%; whereas the new SSC ranged between 0% - 10%. The six positive hair samples indicated that the prevalence rate in the sample was at least 4%. The close proximity of these estimates provides evidence to support the validity of the new SSC model. Using simulations, the recommended sample sizes as the function of the statistical power and expected prevalence rate were calculated. CONCLUSION: The main advantages of the SSC over other indirect methods are: simple administration, completion and calculation, maximum use of the data and good face validity for all respondents. Owing to the key feature that respondents are not required to answer the sensitive question directly, coupled with the absence of forced response or obvious self-protective response strategy, the SSC has the potential to cut across self-protective barriers more effectively than other estimation models. This elegantly simple, quick and effective method can be successfully employed in public health research investigating compromising behaviours. BioMed Central 2011-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3163613/ /pubmed/21812979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-6-20 Text en Copyright ©2011 Petróczi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Petróczi, Andrea Nepusz, Tamás Cross, Paul Taft, Helen Shah, Syeda Deshmukh, Nawed Schaffer, Jay Shane, Maryann Adesanwo, Christiana Barker, James Naughton, Declan P New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone |
title | New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone |
title_full | New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone |
title_fullStr | New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone |
title_full_unstemmed | New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone |
title_short | New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone |
title_sort | new non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3163613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21812979 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-6-20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petrocziandrea newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone AT nepusztamas newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone AT crosspaul newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone AT tafthelen newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone AT shahsyeda newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone AT deshmukhnawed newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone AT schafferjay newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone AT shanemaryann newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone AT adesanwochristiana newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone AT barkerjames newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone AT naughtondeclanp newnonrandomisedmodeltoassesstheprevalenceofdiscriminatingbehaviourapilotstudyonmephedrone |