Cargando…

Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks

BACKGROUND: Despite the widely accepted use of membrane sweeping to prevent postmaturity pregnancies, the optimal frequency for this procedure has not been established. AIM: To determine if the frequency of membrane sweeping in women with an unfavorable cervix at term results in fewer labor inductio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Putnam, Kathleen, Magann, Everett F, Doherty, Dorota A, Poole, Aaron T, Magann, Marcia I, Warner, William B, Chauhan, Suneet P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3163659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21892340
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S23436
_version_ 1782210979043475456
author Putnam, Kathleen
Magann, Everett F
Doherty, Dorota A
Poole, Aaron T
Magann, Marcia I
Warner, William B
Chauhan, Suneet P
author_facet Putnam, Kathleen
Magann, Everett F
Doherty, Dorota A
Poole, Aaron T
Magann, Marcia I
Warner, William B
Chauhan, Suneet P
author_sort Putnam, Kathleen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the widely accepted use of membrane sweeping to prevent postmaturity pregnancies, the optimal frequency for this procedure has not been established. AIM: To determine if the frequency of membrane sweeping in women with an unfavorable cervix at term results in fewer labor inductions. METHODS: This was a randomized trial of women with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop’s score of ≤4) at 39 weeks randomized into three groups: control, once-weekly membrane sweeping, and twice-weekly membrane sweeping. RESULTS: Between January 2005 and June 2008, 350 women were randomized into the study (groups: control [n = 116], once weekly [n = 117], and twice weekly [n = 117]). Randomization of Bishop’s score was different between groups (P = 0.019), with 67%, 71%, and 83% of control, once-, and twice-weekly groups, respectively, having scores of 3–4. There was no difference in the unadjusted rate of labor induction between the groups (35% versus 27% versus 23%, P = 0.149), and after the adjustment for the randomization of Bishop’s score (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41–1.29 and OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.36–1.18 for once- and twice-weekly groups, respectively). A Bishop’s score of 3–4 at randomization was the only statistically significant factor that decreased the likelihood of induction at 41 weeks (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.25–0.69). CONCLUSION: Frequency of membrane sweeping does not influence the likelihood of remaining undelivered at 41 weeks of pregnancy. The Bishop’s score at around 39 weeks is the important factor as a predictor of the duration of pregnancy, and further studies would be required to determine whether membrane sweeping influences pregnancy duration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3163659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31636592011-09-02 Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks Putnam, Kathleen Magann, Everett F Doherty, Dorota A Poole, Aaron T Magann, Marcia I Warner, William B Chauhan, Suneet P Int J Womens Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Despite the widely accepted use of membrane sweeping to prevent postmaturity pregnancies, the optimal frequency for this procedure has not been established. AIM: To determine if the frequency of membrane sweeping in women with an unfavorable cervix at term results in fewer labor inductions. METHODS: This was a randomized trial of women with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop’s score of ≤4) at 39 weeks randomized into three groups: control, once-weekly membrane sweeping, and twice-weekly membrane sweeping. RESULTS: Between January 2005 and June 2008, 350 women were randomized into the study (groups: control [n = 116], once weekly [n = 117], and twice weekly [n = 117]). Randomization of Bishop’s score was different between groups (P = 0.019), with 67%, 71%, and 83% of control, once-, and twice-weekly groups, respectively, having scores of 3–4. There was no difference in the unadjusted rate of labor induction between the groups (35% versus 27% versus 23%, P = 0.149), and after the adjustment for the randomization of Bishop’s score (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41–1.29 and OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.36–1.18 for once- and twice-weekly groups, respectively). A Bishop’s score of 3–4 at randomization was the only statistically significant factor that decreased the likelihood of induction at 41 weeks (OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.25–0.69). CONCLUSION: Frequency of membrane sweeping does not influence the likelihood of remaining undelivered at 41 weeks of pregnancy. The Bishop’s score at around 39 weeks is the important factor as a predictor of the duration of pregnancy, and further studies would be required to determine whether membrane sweeping influences pregnancy duration. Dove Medical Press 2011-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3163659/ /pubmed/21892340 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S23436 Text en © 2011 Putnam et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Putnam, Kathleen
Magann, Everett F
Doherty, Dorota A
Poole, Aaron T
Magann, Marcia I
Warner, William B
Chauhan, Suneet P
Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks
title Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks
title_full Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks
title_fullStr Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks
title_full_unstemmed Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks
title_short Randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks
title_sort randomized clinical trial evaluating the frequency of membrane sweeping with an unfavorable cervix at 39 weeks
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3163659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21892340
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S23436
work_keys_str_mv AT putnamkathleen randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthefrequencyofmembranesweepingwithanunfavorablecervixat39weeks
AT maganneverettf randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthefrequencyofmembranesweepingwithanunfavorablecervixat39weeks
AT dohertydorotaa randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthefrequencyofmembranesweepingwithanunfavorablecervixat39weeks
AT pooleaaront randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthefrequencyofmembranesweepingwithanunfavorablecervixat39weeks
AT magannmarciai randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthefrequencyofmembranesweepingwithanunfavorablecervixat39weeks
AT warnerwilliamb randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthefrequencyofmembranesweepingwithanunfavorablecervixat39weeks
AT chauhansuneetp randomizedclinicaltrialevaluatingthefrequencyofmembranesweepingwithanunfavorablecervixat39weeks