Cargando…

Age-Related Differences in Working Memory Performance in A 2-Back Task

The present study aimed to elucidate the neuro-cognitive processes underlying age-related differences in working memory. Young and middle-aged participants performed a two-choice task with low and a 2-back task with high working memory load. The P300, an event-related potential reflecting controlled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wild-Wall, Nele, Falkenstein, Michael, Gajewski, Patrick D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3163893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21909328
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00186
_version_ 1782210992131801088
author Wild-Wall, Nele
Falkenstein, Michael
Gajewski, Patrick D.
author_facet Wild-Wall, Nele
Falkenstein, Michael
Gajewski, Patrick D.
author_sort Wild-Wall, Nele
collection PubMed
description The present study aimed to elucidate the neuro-cognitive processes underlying age-related differences in working memory. Young and middle-aged participants performed a two-choice task with low and a 2-back task with high working memory load. The P300, an event-related potential reflecting controlled stimulus–response processing in working memory, and the underlying neuronal sources of expected age-related differences were analyzed using sLORETA. Response speed was generally slower for the middle-aged than the young group. Under low working memory load the middle-aged participants traded speed for accuracy. The middle-aged were less efficient in the 2-back task as they responded slower while the error rates did not differ for groups. An age-related decline of the P300 amplitude and characteristic topographical differences were especially evident in the 2-back task. A more detailed analysis of the P300 in non-target trials revealed that amplitudes in the young but not middle-aged group differentiate between correctly detected vs. missed targets in the following trial. For these trials, source analysis revealed higher activation for the young vs. middle-aged group in brain areas which support working memory processes. The relationship between P300 and overt performance was validated by significant correlations. To sum up, under high working memory load the young group showed an increased neuronal activity before a successful detected target, while the middle-aged group showed the same neuronal pattern regardless of whether a subsequent target will be detected or missed. This stable memory trace before detected targets was reflected by a specific activation enhancement in brain areas which orchestrate maintenance, update, storage, and retrieval of information in working memory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3163893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31638932011-09-09 Age-Related Differences in Working Memory Performance in A 2-Back Task Wild-Wall, Nele Falkenstein, Michael Gajewski, Patrick D. Front Psychol Psychology The present study aimed to elucidate the neuro-cognitive processes underlying age-related differences in working memory. Young and middle-aged participants performed a two-choice task with low and a 2-back task with high working memory load. The P300, an event-related potential reflecting controlled stimulus–response processing in working memory, and the underlying neuronal sources of expected age-related differences were analyzed using sLORETA. Response speed was generally slower for the middle-aged than the young group. Under low working memory load the middle-aged participants traded speed for accuracy. The middle-aged were less efficient in the 2-back task as they responded slower while the error rates did not differ for groups. An age-related decline of the P300 amplitude and characteristic topographical differences were especially evident in the 2-back task. A more detailed analysis of the P300 in non-target trials revealed that amplitudes in the young but not middle-aged group differentiate between correctly detected vs. missed targets in the following trial. For these trials, source analysis revealed higher activation for the young vs. middle-aged group in brain areas which support working memory processes. The relationship between P300 and overt performance was validated by significant correlations. To sum up, under high working memory load the young group showed an increased neuronal activity before a successful detected target, while the middle-aged group showed the same neuronal pattern regardless of whether a subsequent target will be detected or missed. This stable memory trace before detected targets was reflected by a specific activation enhancement in brain areas which orchestrate maintenance, update, storage, and retrieval of information in working memory. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3163893/ /pubmed/21909328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00186 Text en Copyright © 2011 Wild-Wall, Falkenstein and Gajewski. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.
spellingShingle Psychology
Wild-Wall, Nele
Falkenstein, Michael
Gajewski, Patrick D.
Age-Related Differences in Working Memory Performance in A 2-Back Task
title Age-Related Differences in Working Memory Performance in A 2-Back Task
title_full Age-Related Differences in Working Memory Performance in A 2-Back Task
title_fullStr Age-Related Differences in Working Memory Performance in A 2-Back Task
title_full_unstemmed Age-Related Differences in Working Memory Performance in A 2-Back Task
title_short Age-Related Differences in Working Memory Performance in A 2-Back Task
title_sort age-related differences in working memory performance in a 2-back task
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3163893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21909328
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00186
work_keys_str_mv AT wildwallnele agerelateddifferencesinworkingmemoryperformanceina2backtask
AT falkensteinmichael agerelateddifferencesinworkingmemoryperformanceina2backtask
AT gajewskipatrickd agerelateddifferencesinworkingmemoryperformanceina2backtask