Cargando…
Should benefit–risk assessment have its own drug “label”?
Many consumers and clinicians incorrectly believe that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of a new therapeutic implies that its benefits have been proven to exceed its harms. While the FDA could require proof that benefits exceed harms prior to approval, it has been argued that this app...
Autor principal: | Braithwaite, R Scott |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3163936/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21904466 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DHPS.S21927 |
Ejemplares similares
-
It’s time to step it up. Why safety investigations in healthcare should look more to safety science
por: Wiig, Siri, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Primary care providers should prescribe aspirin to prevent cardiovascular disease based on benefit−risk ratio, not age
por: Kim, Kyungmann, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Neurological Dysfunction in Long COVID Should Not Be Labelled as Functional Neurological Disorder
por: Van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Guest Editorial: Assessing Risks and Benefits of Genistein and Soy
por: Setchell, Kenneth D.R.
Publicado: (2006) -
Modeling and Simulation to Optimize the Design and Analysis of Confirmatory Trials, Characterize Risk–Benefit, and Support Label Claims
por: Marshall, S F, et al.
Publicado: (2013)