Cargando…

The Use of Electroencephalography in Language Production Research: A Review

Speech production long avoided electrophysiological experiments due to the suspicion that potential artifacts caused by muscle activity of overt speech may lead to a bad signal-to-noise ratio in the measurements. Therefore, researchers have sought to assess speech production by using indirect speech...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ganushchak, Lesya Y., Christoffels, Ingrid K., Schiller, Niels O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3164111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21909333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00208
_version_ 1782211011131998208
author Ganushchak, Lesya Y.
Christoffels, Ingrid K.
Schiller, Niels O.
author_facet Ganushchak, Lesya Y.
Christoffels, Ingrid K.
Schiller, Niels O.
author_sort Ganushchak, Lesya Y.
collection PubMed
description Speech production long avoided electrophysiological experiments due to the suspicion that potential artifacts caused by muscle activity of overt speech may lead to a bad signal-to-noise ratio in the measurements. Therefore, researchers have sought to assess speech production by using indirect speech production tasks, such as tacit or implicit naming, delayed naming, or meta-linguistic tasks, such as phoneme-monitoring. Covert speech may, however, involve different processes than overt speech production. Recently, overt speech has been investigated using electroencephalography (EEG). As the number of papers published is rising steadily, this clearly indicates the increasing interest and demand for overt speech research within the field of cognitive neuroscience of language. Our main goal here is to review all currently available results of overt speech production involving EEG measurements, such as picture naming, Stroop naming, and reading aloud. We conclude that overt speech production can be successfully studied using electrophysiological measures, for instance, event-related brain potentials (ERPs). We will discuss possible relevant components in the ERP waveform of speech production and aim to address the issue of how to interpret the results of ERP research using overt speech, and whether the ERP components in language production are comparable to results from other fields.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3164111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31641112011-09-09 The Use of Electroencephalography in Language Production Research: A Review Ganushchak, Lesya Y. Christoffels, Ingrid K. Schiller, Niels O. Front Psychol Psychology Speech production long avoided electrophysiological experiments due to the suspicion that potential artifacts caused by muscle activity of overt speech may lead to a bad signal-to-noise ratio in the measurements. Therefore, researchers have sought to assess speech production by using indirect speech production tasks, such as tacit or implicit naming, delayed naming, or meta-linguistic tasks, such as phoneme-monitoring. Covert speech may, however, involve different processes than overt speech production. Recently, overt speech has been investigated using electroencephalography (EEG). As the number of papers published is rising steadily, this clearly indicates the increasing interest and demand for overt speech research within the field of cognitive neuroscience of language. Our main goal here is to review all currently available results of overt speech production involving EEG measurements, such as picture naming, Stroop naming, and reading aloud. We conclude that overt speech production can be successfully studied using electrophysiological measures, for instance, event-related brain potentials (ERPs). We will discuss possible relevant components in the ERP waveform of speech production and aim to address the issue of how to interpret the results of ERP research using overt speech, and whether the ERP components in language production are comparable to results from other fields. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3164111/ /pubmed/21909333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00208 Text en Copyright © 2011 Ganushchak, Christoffels and Schiller. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.
spellingShingle Psychology
Ganushchak, Lesya Y.
Christoffels, Ingrid K.
Schiller, Niels O.
The Use of Electroencephalography in Language Production Research: A Review
title The Use of Electroencephalography in Language Production Research: A Review
title_full The Use of Electroencephalography in Language Production Research: A Review
title_fullStr The Use of Electroencephalography in Language Production Research: A Review
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Electroencephalography in Language Production Research: A Review
title_short The Use of Electroencephalography in Language Production Research: A Review
title_sort use of electroencephalography in language production research: a review
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3164111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21909333
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00208
work_keys_str_mv AT ganushchaklesyay theuseofelectroencephalographyinlanguageproductionresearchareview
AT christoffelsingridk theuseofelectroencephalographyinlanguageproductionresearchareview
AT schillernielso theuseofelectroencephalographyinlanguageproductionresearchareview
AT ganushchaklesyay useofelectroencephalographyinlanguageproductionresearchareview
AT christoffelsingridk useofelectroencephalographyinlanguageproductionresearchareview
AT schillernielso useofelectroencephalographyinlanguageproductionresearchareview