Cargando…
The Use of Electroencephalography in Language Production Research: A Review
Speech production long avoided electrophysiological experiments due to the suspicion that potential artifacts caused by muscle activity of overt speech may lead to a bad signal-to-noise ratio in the measurements. Therefore, researchers have sought to assess speech production by using indirect speech...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3164111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21909333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00208 |
_version_ | 1782211011131998208 |
---|---|
author | Ganushchak, Lesya Y. Christoffels, Ingrid K. Schiller, Niels O. |
author_facet | Ganushchak, Lesya Y. Christoffels, Ingrid K. Schiller, Niels O. |
author_sort | Ganushchak, Lesya Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Speech production long avoided electrophysiological experiments due to the suspicion that potential artifacts caused by muscle activity of overt speech may lead to a bad signal-to-noise ratio in the measurements. Therefore, researchers have sought to assess speech production by using indirect speech production tasks, such as tacit or implicit naming, delayed naming, or meta-linguistic tasks, such as phoneme-monitoring. Covert speech may, however, involve different processes than overt speech production. Recently, overt speech has been investigated using electroencephalography (EEG). As the number of papers published is rising steadily, this clearly indicates the increasing interest and demand for overt speech research within the field of cognitive neuroscience of language. Our main goal here is to review all currently available results of overt speech production involving EEG measurements, such as picture naming, Stroop naming, and reading aloud. We conclude that overt speech production can be successfully studied using electrophysiological measures, for instance, event-related brain potentials (ERPs). We will discuss possible relevant components in the ERP waveform of speech production and aim to address the issue of how to interpret the results of ERP research using overt speech, and whether the ERP components in language production are comparable to results from other fields. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3164111 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31641112011-09-09 The Use of Electroencephalography in Language Production Research: A Review Ganushchak, Lesya Y. Christoffels, Ingrid K. Schiller, Niels O. Front Psychol Psychology Speech production long avoided electrophysiological experiments due to the suspicion that potential artifacts caused by muscle activity of overt speech may lead to a bad signal-to-noise ratio in the measurements. Therefore, researchers have sought to assess speech production by using indirect speech production tasks, such as tacit or implicit naming, delayed naming, or meta-linguistic tasks, such as phoneme-monitoring. Covert speech may, however, involve different processes than overt speech production. Recently, overt speech has been investigated using electroencephalography (EEG). As the number of papers published is rising steadily, this clearly indicates the increasing interest and demand for overt speech research within the field of cognitive neuroscience of language. Our main goal here is to review all currently available results of overt speech production involving EEG measurements, such as picture naming, Stroop naming, and reading aloud. We conclude that overt speech production can be successfully studied using electrophysiological measures, for instance, event-related brain potentials (ERPs). We will discuss possible relevant components in the ERP waveform of speech production and aim to address the issue of how to interpret the results of ERP research using overt speech, and whether the ERP components in language production are comparable to results from other fields. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3164111/ /pubmed/21909333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00208 Text en Copyright © 2011 Ganushchak, Christoffels and Schiller. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Ganushchak, Lesya Y. Christoffels, Ingrid K. Schiller, Niels O. The Use of Electroencephalography in Language Production Research: A Review |
title | The Use of Electroencephalography in Language Production Research: A Review |
title_full | The Use of Electroencephalography in Language Production Research: A Review |
title_fullStr | The Use of Electroencephalography in Language Production Research: A Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of Electroencephalography in Language Production Research: A Review |
title_short | The Use of Electroencephalography in Language Production Research: A Review |
title_sort | use of electroencephalography in language production research: a review |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3164111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21909333 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00208 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ganushchaklesyay theuseofelectroencephalographyinlanguageproductionresearchareview AT christoffelsingridk theuseofelectroencephalographyinlanguageproductionresearchareview AT schillernielso theuseofelectroencephalographyinlanguageproductionresearchareview AT ganushchaklesyay useofelectroencephalographyinlanguageproductionresearchareview AT christoffelsingridk useofelectroencephalographyinlanguageproductionresearchareview AT schillernielso useofelectroencephalographyinlanguageproductionresearchareview |