Cargando…

Feedback inhibition of L1 and alu retrotransposition through altered double strand break repair kinetics

BACKGROUND: Cells adapt to various chronic toxic exposures in a multitude of ways to minimize further damage and maximize their growth potential. Expression of L1 elements in the human genome can be greatly deleterious to cells, generating numerous double strand breaks (DSBs). Cells have been report...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wallace, Nicholas A, Belancio, Victoria P, Faber, Zach, Deininger, Prescott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3164224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20979631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1759-8753-1-22
_version_ 1782211024260169728
author Wallace, Nicholas A
Belancio, Victoria P
Faber, Zach
Deininger, Prescott
author_facet Wallace, Nicholas A
Belancio, Victoria P
Faber, Zach
Deininger, Prescott
author_sort Wallace, Nicholas A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cells adapt to various chronic toxic exposures in a multitude of ways to minimize further damage and maximize their growth potential. Expression of L1 elements in the human genome can be greatly deleterious to cells, generating numerous double strand breaks (DSBs). Cells have been reported to respond to chronic DSBs by altering the repair of these breaks, including increasing the rate of homology independent DSB repair. Retrotransposition is strongly affected by proteins involved in DSB repair. Therefore, L1 expression has the potential to be a source of chronic DSBs and thus bring about the changes in cellular environment that could ultimately restrict its own retrotransposition. RESULTS: We demonstrate that constitutive L1 expression leads to quicker DSB repair and decreases in the retrotransposition potential of L1 and other retrotransposons dependent on L1 expression for their mobility. This cellular adaptation results in reduced sensitivity to L1 induced toxicity. These effects can be induced by constitutive expression of the functional L1 ORF2 alone, but not by the constitutive expression of an L1 open reading frame 2 with mutations to its endonuclease and reverse transcriptase domains. This adaptation correlates with the relative activity of the L1 introduced into the cells. CONCLUSIONS: The increased number of DSBs resulting from constitutive expression of L1 results in a more rapid rate of repair. The cellular response to this L1 expression also results in attenuation of retrotransposition and reduced sensitivity of the cells to negative consequences of L1 ORF2 expression. The influence does not appear to be through RNA interference. We believe that the increased rate of DSB repair is the most likely cause of the attenuation of retrotransposition. These alterations act as a fail safe mechanism that allows cells to escape the toxicity associated with the unchecked L1 expression. This gives cells that overexpress L1, such as tumor cells, the ability to survive the high levels of expression. However, the increased rate of break repair may come at the cost of accuracy of repair of the lesion, resulting in increased genomic instability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3164224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31642242011-09-02 Feedback inhibition of L1 and alu retrotransposition through altered double strand break repair kinetics Wallace, Nicholas A Belancio, Victoria P Faber, Zach Deininger, Prescott Mob DNA Research BACKGROUND: Cells adapt to various chronic toxic exposures in a multitude of ways to minimize further damage and maximize their growth potential. Expression of L1 elements in the human genome can be greatly deleterious to cells, generating numerous double strand breaks (DSBs). Cells have been reported to respond to chronic DSBs by altering the repair of these breaks, including increasing the rate of homology independent DSB repair. Retrotransposition is strongly affected by proteins involved in DSB repair. Therefore, L1 expression has the potential to be a source of chronic DSBs and thus bring about the changes in cellular environment that could ultimately restrict its own retrotransposition. RESULTS: We demonstrate that constitutive L1 expression leads to quicker DSB repair and decreases in the retrotransposition potential of L1 and other retrotransposons dependent on L1 expression for their mobility. This cellular adaptation results in reduced sensitivity to L1 induced toxicity. These effects can be induced by constitutive expression of the functional L1 ORF2 alone, but not by the constitutive expression of an L1 open reading frame 2 with mutations to its endonuclease and reverse transcriptase domains. This adaptation correlates with the relative activity of the L1 introduced into the cells. CONCLUSIONS: The increased number of DSBs resulting from constitutive expression of L1 results in a more rapid rate of repair. The cellular response to this L1 expression also results in attenuation of retrotransposition and reduced sensitivity of the cells to negative consequences of L1 ORF2 expression. The influence does not appear to be through RNA interference. We believe that the increased rate of DSB repair is the most likely cause of the attenuation of retrotransposition. These alterations act as a fail safe mechanism that allows cells to escape the toxicity associated with the unchecked L1 expression. This gives cells that overexpress L1, such as tumor cells, the ability to survive the high levels of expression. However, the increased rate of break repair may come at the cost of accuracy of repair of the lesion, resulting in increased genomic instability. BioMed Central 2010-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3164224/ /pubmed/20979631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1759-8753-1-22 Text en Copyright ©2010 Wallace et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Wallace, Nicholas A
Belancio, Victoria P
Faber, Zach
Deininger, Prescott
Feedback inhibition of L1 and alu retrotransposition through altered double strand break repair kinetics
title Feedback inhibition of L1 and alu retrotransposition through altered double strand break repair kinetics
title_full Feedback inhibition of L1 and alu retrotransposition through altered double strand break repair kinetics
title_fullStr Feedback inhibition of L1 and alu retrotransposition through altered double strand break repair kinetics
title_full_unstemmed Feedback inhibition of L1 and alu retrotransposition through altered double strand break repair kinetics
title_short Feedback inhibition of L1 and alu retrotransposition through altered double strand break repair kinetics
title_sort feedback inhibition of l1 and alu retrotransposition through altered double strand break repair kinetics
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3164224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20979631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1759-8753-1-22
work_keys_str_mv AT wallacenicholasa feedbackinhibitionofl1andaluretrotranspositionthroughaltereddoublestrandbreakrepairkinetics
AT belanciovictoriap feedbackinhibitionofl1andaluretrotranspositionthroughaltereddoublestrandbreakrepairkinetics
AT faberzach feedbackinhibitionofl1andaluretrotranspositionthroughaltereddoublestrandbreakrepairkinetics
AT deiningerprescott feedbackinhibitionofl1andaluretrotranspositionthroughaltereddoublestrandbreakrepairkinetics