Cargando…

Towards a definition of glomerulomegaly: clinical–pathological and methodological considerations

Background. Glomerulomegaly, the abnormal enlargement of glomeruli, has been related to an increased risk of glomerulosclerosis, but the degree of enlargement that constitutes glomerulomegaly has not been defined. Methods. The principal stereological methods for estimating glomerular volume are [1]...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hughson, Michael D., Hoy, Wendy E., Douglas-Denton, Rebecca N., Zimanyi, Monika A., Bertram, John F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3164445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21115671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq688
_version_ 1782211039389024256
author Hughson, Michael D.
Hoy, Wendy E.
Douglas-Denton, Rebecca N.
Zimanyi, Monika A.
Bertram, John F.
author_facet Hughson, Michael D.
Hoy, Wendy E.
Douglas-Denton, Rebecca N.
Zimanyi, Monika A.
Bertram, John F.
author_sort Hughson, Michael D.
collection PubMed
description Background. Glomerulomegaly, the abnormal enlargement of glomeruli, has been related to an increased risk of glomerulosclerosis, but the degree of enlargement that constitutes glomerulomegaly has not been defined. Methods. The principal stereological methods for estimating glomerular volume are [1] the disector/Cavalieri method that is considered the ‘gold standard’ for measuring individual glomerular volume (IV(glom)) and [2] the disector/fractionator technique that estimates average glomerular volume (V(glom)) together with total glomerular number (N(glom)) for the entire kidney. The two methods produce different estimates with V(glom) consistently exceeding IV(glom). This study compares glomerular volumes obtained by the two methods in autopsy kidneys of 39 African American and 34 US white adult males, and correlates the values with N(glom), body mass index (BMI), hypertension, glomerulosclerosis and race, factors known or thought to influence glomerular volume. Results. For the smallest glomeruli, V(glom) was 25% larger than IV(glom) with the difference increasing to over 50% for kidneys with the largest glomeruli. Both V(glom) and IV(glom) showed significant inverse correlations with N(glom) and significant direct correlations with BMI and hypertension. African Americans had larger IV(glom) and V(glom) than whites, but only IV(glom) was significant. The 90th percentile for IV(glom) was 6.81 μm(3) × 10(6) and 13.10 μm(3) × 10(6) for V(glom), but larger glomerular size did not separate hypertensive from non-hypertensive subjects nor did it show any significant relationship to glomerulosclerosis. While V(glom) overestimated glomerular size compared with IV(glom), both measurements demonstrated similar relationships to factors influencing glomerular volume. Conclusions. With neither method could glomerulomegaly, the abnormal enlargement of glomerular size predisposing to glomerulosclerosis, be determined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3164445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31644452012-07-01 Towards a definition of glomerulomegaly: clinical–pathological and methodological considerations Hughson, Michael D. Hoy, Wendy E. Douglas-Denton, Rebecca N. Zimanyi, Monika A. Bertram, John F. Nephrol Dial Transplant Original Article Background. Glomerulomegaly, the abnormal enlargement of glomeruli, has been related to an increased risk of glomerulosclerosis, but the degree of enlargement that constitutes glomerulomegaly has not been defined. Methods. The principal stereological methods for estimating glomerular volume are [1] the disector/Cavalieri method that is considered the ‘gold standard’ for measuring individual glomerular volume (IV(glom)) and [2] the disector/fractionator technique that estimates average glomerular volume (V(glom)) together with total glomerular number (N(glom)) for the entire kidney. The two methods produce different estimates with V(glom) consistently exceeding IV(glom). This study compares glomerular volumes obtained by the two methods in autopsy kidneys of 39 African American and 34 US white adult males, and correlates the values with N(glom), body mass index (BMI), hypertension, glomerulosclerosis and race, factors known or thought to influence glomerular volume. Results. For the smallest glomeruli, V(glom) was 25% larger than IV(glom) with the difference increasing to over 50% for kidneys with the largest glomeruli. Both V(glom) and IV(glom) showed significant inverse correlations with N(glom) and significant direct correlations with BMI and hypertension. African Americans had larger IV(glom) and V(glom) than whites, but only IV(glom) was significant. The 90th percentile for IV(glom) was 6.81 μm(3) × 10(6) and 13.10 μm(3) × 10(6) for V(glom), but larger glomerular size did not separate hypertensive from non-hypertensive subjects nor did it show any significant relationship to glomerulosclerosis. While V(glom) overestimated glomerular size compared with IV(glom), both measurements demonstrated similar relationships to factors influencing glomerular volume. Conclusions. With neither method could glomerulomegaly, the abnormal enlargement of glomerular size predisposing to glomerulosclerosis, be determined. Oxford University Press 2011-07 2010-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC3164445/ /pubmed/21115671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq688 Text en © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hughson, Michael D.
Hoy, Wendy E.
Douglas-Denton, Rebecca N.
Zimanyi, Monika A.
Bertram, John F.
Towards a definition of glomerulomegaly: clinical–pathological and methodological considerations
title Towards a definition of glomerulomegaly: clinical–pathological and methodological considerations
title_full Towards a definition of glomerulomegaly: clinical–pathological and methodological considerations
title_fullStr Towards a definition of glomerulomegaly: clinical–pathological and methodological considerations
title_full_unstemmed Towards a definition of glomerulomegaly: clinical–pathological and methodological considerations
title_short Towards a definition of glomerulomegaly: clinical–pathological and methodological considerations
title_sort towards a definition of glomerulomegaly: clinical–pathological and methodological considerations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3164445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21115671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq688
work_keys_str_mv AT hughsonmichaeld towardsadefinitionofglomerulomegalyclinicalpathologicalandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT hoywendye towardsadefinitionofglomerulomegalyclinicalpathologicalandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT douglasdentonrebeccan towardsadefinitionofglomerulomegalyclinicalpathologicalandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT zimanyimonikaa towardsadefinitionofglomerulomegalyclinicalpathologicalandmethodologicalconsiderations
AT bertramjohnf towardsadefinitionofglomerulomegalyclinicalpathologicalandmethodologicalconsiderations