Cargando…

Variations in Shape-Sensitive Restriction Points Mirror Differences in the Regeneration Capacities of Avian and Mammalian Ears

When inner ear hair cells die, humans and other mammals experience permanent hearing and balance deficits, but non-mammalian vertebrates quickly recover these senses after epithelial supporting cells give rise to replacement hair cells. A postnatal decline in cellular plasticity appears to limit reg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collado, Maria Sol, Burns, Joseph C., Meyers, Jason R., Corwin, Jeffrey T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3166124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21909368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023861
_version_ 1782211123261472768
author Collado, Maria Sol
Burns, Joseph C.
Meyers, Jason R.
Corwin, Jeffrey T.
author_facet Collado, Maria Sol
Burns, Joseph C.
Meyers, Jason R.
Corwin, Jeffrey T.
author_sort Collado, Maria Sol
collection PubMed
description When inner ear hair cells die, humans and other mammals experience permanent hearing and balance deficits, but non-mammalian vertebrates quickly recover these senses after epithelial supporting cells give rise to replacement hair cells. A postnatal decline in cellular plasticity appears to limit regeneration in mammalian balance organs, where declining proliferation responses are correlated with decreased spreading of supporting cells on artificial and native substrates. By culturing balance epithelia on substrates that differed in flexibility, we assessed spreading effects independent of age, showing a strong correlation between shape change and supporting cell proliferation. Then we made excision wounds in utricles cultured from young and old chickens and mice and compared quantified levels of spreading and proliferation. In utricles from young mice, and both young and old chickens, wounds re-epithelialized in <24 hours, while those in utricles from mature mice took three times longer. More cells changed shape in the fastest healing wounds, which accounted for some differences in the levels of proliferation, but inter-species and age-related differences in shape-sensitive restriction points, i.e., the cellular thresholds for shape changes that promote S-phase, were evident and may be particularly influential in the responses to hair cell losses in vivo.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3166124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31661242011-09-09 Variations in Shape-Sensitive Restriction Points Mirror Differences in the Regeneration Capacities of Avian and Mammalian Ears Collado, Maria Sol Burns, Joseph C. Meyers, Jason R. Corwin, Jeffrey T. PLoS One Research Article When inner ear hair cells die, humans and other mammals experience permanent hearing and balance deficits, but non-mammalian vertebrates quickly recover these senses after epithelial supporting cells give rise to replacement hair cells. A postnatal decline in cellular plasticity appears to limit regeneration in mammalian balance organs, where declining proliferation responses are correlated with decreased spreading of supporting cells on artificial and native substrates. By culturing balance epithelia on substrates that differed in flexibility, we assessed spreading effects independent of age, showing a strong correlation between shape change and supporting cell proliferation. Then we made excision wounds in utricles cultured from young and old chickens and mice and compared quantified levels of spreading and proliferation. In utricles from young mice, and both young and old chickens, wounds re-epithelialized in <24 hours, while those in utricles from mature mice took three times longer. More cells changed shape in the fastest healing wounds, which accounted for some differences in the levels of proliferation, but inter-species and age-related differences in shape-sensitive restriction points, i.e., the cellular thresholds for shape changes that promote S-phase, were evident and may be particularly influential in the responses to hair cell losses in vivo. Public Library of Science 2011-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3166124/ /pubmed/21909368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023861 Text en Collado et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Collado, Maria Sol
Burns, Joseph C.
Meyers, Jason R.
Corwin, Jeffrey T.
Variations in Shape-Sensitive Restriction Points Mirror Differences in the Regeneration Capacities of Avian and Mammalian Ears
title Variations in Shape-Sensitive Restriction Points Mirror Differences in the Regeneration Capacities of Avian and Mammalian Ears
title_full Variations in Shape-Sensitive Restriction Points Mirror Differences in the Regeneration Capacities of Avian and Mammalian Ears
title_fullStr Variations in Shape-Sensitive Restriction Points Mirror Differences in the Regeneration Capacities of Avian and Mammalian Ears
title_full_unstemmed Variations in Shape-Sensitive Restriction Points Mirror Differences in the Regeneration Capacities of Avian and Mammalian Ears
title_short Variations in Shape-Sensitive Restriction Points Mirror Differences in the Regeneration Capacities of Avian and Mammalian Ears
title_sort variations in shape-sensitive restriction points mirror differences in the regeneration capacities of avian and mammalian ears
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3166124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21909368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023861
work_keys_str_mv AT colladomariasol variationsinshapesensitiverestrictionpointsmirrordifferencesintheregenerationcapacitiesofavianandmammalianears
AT burnsjosephc variationsinshapesensitiverestrictionpointsmirrordifferencesintheregenerationcapacitiesofavianandmammalianears
AT meyersjasonr variationsinshapesensitiverestrictionpointsmirrordifferencesintheregenerationcapacitiesofavianandmammalianears
AT corwinjeffreyt variationsinshapesensitiverestrictionpointsmirrordifferencesintheregenerationcapacitiesofavianandmammalianears