Cargando…

Insights from Epidemiology into Dichloromethane and Cancer Risk

Dichloromethane (methylene chloride) is a widely used chlorinated solvent. We review the available epidemiology studies (five cohort studies, 13 case-control studies, including seven of hematopoietic cancers), focusing on specific cancer sites. There was little indication of an increased risk of lun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooper, Glinda S., Scott, Cheryl Siegel, Bale, Ambuja S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3166749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21909313
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8083380
_version_ 1782211180420399104
author Cooper, Glinda S.
Scott, Cheryl Siegel
Bale, Ambuja S.
author_facet Cooper, Glinda S.
Scott, Cheryl Siegel
Bale, Ambuja S.
author_sort Cooper, Glinda S.
collection PubMed
description Dichloromethane (methylene chloride) is a widely used chlorinated solvent. We review the available epidemiology studies (five cohort studies, 13 case-control studies, including seven of hematopoietic cancers), focusing on specific cancer sites. There was little indication of an increased risk of lung cancer in the cohort studies (standardized mortality ratios ranging from 0.46 to 1.21). These cohorts are relatively small, and variable effects (e.g., point estimates ranging from 0.5 to 2.0) were seen for the rarer forms of cancers such as brain cancer and specific hematopoietic cancers. Three large population-based case-control studies of incident non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Europe and the United States observed odds ratios between 1.5 and 2.2 with dichloromethane exposure (ever exposed or highest category of exposure), with higher risk seen in specific subsets of disease. More limited indications of associations with brain cancer, breast cancer, and liver and biliary cancer were also seen in this collection of studies. Existing cohort studies, given their size and uneven exposure information, are unlikely to resolve questions of cancer risks and dichloromethane exposure. More promising approaches are population-based case-control studies of incident disease, and the combination of data from such studies, with robust exposure assessments that include detailed occupational information and exposure assignment based on industry-wide surveys or direct exposure measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3166749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31667492011-09-09 Insights from Epidemiology into Dichloromethane and Cancer Risk Cooper, Glinda S. Scott, Cheryl Siegel Bale, Ambuja S. Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Dichloromethane (methylene chloride) is a widely used chlorinated solvent. We review the available epidemiology studies (five cohort studies, 13 case-control studies, including seven of hematopoietic cancers), focusing on specific cancer sites. There was little indication of an increased risk of lung cancer in the cohort studies (standardized mortality ratios ranging from 0.46 to 1.21). These cohorts are relatively small, and variable effects (e.g., point estimates ranging from 0.5 to 2.0) were seen for the rarer forms of cancers such as brain cancer and specific hematopoietic cancers. Three large population-based case-control studies of incident non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Europe and the United States observed odds ratios between 1.5 and 2.2 with dichloromethane exposure (ever exposed or highest category of exposure), with higher risk seen in specific subsets of disease. More limited indications of associations with brain cancer, breast cancer, and liver and biliary cancer were also seen in this collection of studies. Existing cohort studies, given their size and uneven exposure information, are unlikely to resolve questions of cancer risks and dichloromethane exposure. More promising approaches are population-based case-control studies of incident disease, and the combination of data from such studies, with robust exposure assessments that include detailed occupational information and exposure assignment based on industry-wide surveys or direct exposure measurements. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2011-08 2011-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3166749/ /pubmed/21909313 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8083380 Text en © 2011 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Cooper, Glinda S.
Scott, Cheryl Siegel
Bale, Ambuja S.
Insights from Epidemiology into Dichloromethane and Cancer Risk
title Insights from Epidemiology into Dichloromethane and Cancer Risk
title_full Insights from Epidemiology into Dichloromethane and Cancer Risk
title_fullStr Insights from Epidemiology into Dichloromethane and Cancer Risk
title_full_unstemmed Insights from Epidemiology into Dichloromethane and Cancer Risk
title_short Insights from Epidemiology into Dichloromethane and Cancer Risk
title_sort insights from epidemiology into dichloromethane and cancer risk
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3166749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21909313
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8083380
work_keys_str_mv AT cooperglindas insightsfromepidemiologyintodichloromethaneandcancerrisk
AT scottcherylsiegel insightsfromepidemiologyintodichloromethaneandcancerrisk
AT baleambujas insightsfromepidemiologyintodichloromethaneandcancerrisk