Cargando…
Processing of Voiced and Unvoiced Acoustic Stimuli in Musicians
Past research has shown that musical training induces changes in the processing of supra-segmental aspects of speech, such as pitch and prosody. The aim of the present study was to determine whether musical expertise also leads to an altered neurophysiological processing of sub-segmental information...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3167375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21922011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00195 |
_version_ | 1782211253223030784 |
---|---|
author | Ott, Cyrill Guy Martin Langer, Nicolas Oechslin, Mathias S. Meyer, Martin Jäncke, Lutz |
author_facet | Ott, Cyrill Guy Martin Langer, Nicolas Oechslin, Mathias S. Meyer, Martin Jäncke, Lutz |
author_sort | Ott, Cyrill Guy Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Past research has shown that musical training induces changes in the processing of supra-segmental aspects of speech, such as pitch and prosody. The aim of the present study was to determine whether musical expertise also leads to an altered neurophysiological processing of sub-segmental information available in the speech signal, in particular the voice-onset-time. Using high-density EEG-recordings we analyzed the neurophysiological responses to voiced and unvoiced consonant-vowel-syllables and noise-analogs in 26 German speaking adult musicians and non-musicians. From the EEG the N1 amplitude of the event-related potential and two microstates from the topographical EEG analysis (one around the N1 amplitude and one immediately preceding the N1 microstate) were calculated to the different stimuli. Similar to earlier studies the N1 amplitude was different to voiced and unvoiced stimuli in non-musicians with larger amplitudes to voiced stimuli. The more refined microstate analysis revealed that the microstate within the N1 time window was shorter to unvoiced stimuli in non-musicians. For musicians there was no difference for the N1 amplitudes and the corresponding microstates between voiced and unvoiced stimuli. In addition, there was a longer very early microstate preceding the microstate at the N1 time window to non-speech stimuli only in musicians. Taken together, our findings suggest that musicians process unvoiced stimuli (irrespective whether these stimuli are speech or non-speech stimuli) differently than controls. We propose that musicians utilize the same network to analyze unvoiced stimuli as for the analysis of voiced stimuli. As a further explanation it is also possible that musicians devote more neurophysiological resources into the analysis of unvoiced segments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3167375 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Frontiers Research Foundation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31673752011-09-15 Processing of Voiced and Unvoiced Acoustic Stimuli in Musicians Ott, Cyrill Guy Martin Langer, Nicolas Oechslin, Mathias S. Meyer, Martin Jäncke, Lutz Front Psychol Psychology Past research has shown that musical training induces changes in the processing of supra-segmental aspects of speech, such as pitch and prosody. The aim of the present study was to determine whether musical expertise also leads to an altered neurophysiological processing of sub-segmental information available in the speech signal, in particular the voice-onset-time. Using high-density EEG-recordings we analyzed the neurophysiological responses to voiced and unvoiced consonant-vowel-syllables and noise-analogs in 26 German speaking adult musicians and non-musicians. From the EEG the N1 amplitude of the event-related potential and two microstates from the topographical EEG analysis (one around the N1 amplitude and one immediately preceding the N1 microstate) were calculated to the different stimuli. Similar to earlier studies the N1 amplitude was different to voiced and unvoiced stimuli in non-musicians with larger amplitudes to voiced stimuli. The more refined microstate analysis revealed that the microstate within the N1 time window was shorter to unvoiced stimuli in non-musicians. For musicians there was no difference for the N1 amplitudes and the corresponding microstates between voiced and unvoiced stimuli. In addition, there was a longer very early microstate preceding the microstate at the N1 time window to non-speech stimuli only in musicians. Taken together, our findings suggest that musicians process unvoiced stimuli (irrespective whether these stimuli are speech or non-speech stimuli) differently than controls. We propose that musicians utilize the same network to analyze unvoiced stimuli as for the analysis of voiced stimuli. As a further explanation it is also possible that musicians devote more neurophysiological resources into the analysis of unvoiced segments. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3167375/ /pubmed/21922011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00195 Text en Copyright © 2011 Ott, Langer, Oechslin, Meyer and Jäncke. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Ott, Cyrill Guy Martin Langer, Nicolas Oechslin, Mathias S. Meyer, Martin Jäncke, Lutz Processing of Voiced and Unvoiced Acoustic Stimuli in Musicians |
title | Processing of Voiced and Unvoiced Acoustic Stimuli in Musicians |
title_full | Processing of Voiced and Unvoiced Acoustic Stimuli in Musicians |
title_fullStr | Processing of Voiced and Unvoiced Acoustic Stimuli in Musicians |
title_full_unstemmed | Processing of Voiced and Unvoiced Acoustic Stimuli in Musicians |
title_short | Processing of Voiced and Unvoiced Acoustic Stimuli in Musicians |
title_sort | processing of voiced and unvoiced acoustic stimuli in musicians |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3167375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21922011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00195 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ottcyrillguymartin processingofvoicedandunvoicedacousticstimuliinmusicians AT langernicolas processingofvoicedandunvoicedacousticstimuliinmusicians AT oechslinmathiass processingofvoicedandunvoicedacousticstimuliinmusicians AT meyermartin processingofvoicedandunvoicedacousticstimuliinmusicians AT janckelutz processingofvoicedandunvoicedacousticstimuliinmusicians |