Cargando…
Relationships between Membrane Binding, Affinity and Cell Internalization Efficacy of a Cell-Penetrating Peptide: Penetratin as a Case Study
BACKGROUND: Penetratin is a positively charged cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) that has the ability to bind negatively charged membrane components, such as glycosaminoglycans and anionic lipids. Whether this primary interaction of penetratin with these cell surface components implies that the peptide...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3167814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21915283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024096 |
_version_ | 1782211291869347840 |
---|---|
author | Alves, Isabel D. Bechara, Cherine Walrant, Astrid Zaltsman, Yefim Jiao, Chen-Yu Sagan, Sandrine |
author_facet | Alves, Isabel D. Bechara, Cherine Walrant, Astrid Zaltsman, Yefim Jiao, Chen-Yu Sagan, Sandrine |
author_sort | Alves, Isabel D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Penetratin is a positively charged cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) that has the ability to bind negatively charged membrane components, such as glycosaminoglycans and anionic lipids. Whether this primary interaction of penetratin with these cell surface components implies that the peptide will be further internalized is not clear. METHODOLOGY: Using mass spectrometry, the amount of internalized and membrane bound penetratin remaining after washings, were quantified in three different cell lines: wild type (WT), glycosaminoglycans- (GAG(neg)) and sialic acid-deficient (SA(neg)) cells. Additionally, the affinity and kinetics of the interaction of penetratin to membrane models composed of pure lipids and membrane fragments from the referred cell lines was investigated, as well as the thermodynamics of such interactions using plasmon resonance and calorimetry. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Penetratin internalized with the same efficacy in the three cell lines at 1 µM, but was better internalized at 10 µM in SA(neg)>WT>GAG(neg). The heat released by the interaction of penetratin with these cells followed the ranking order of internalization efficiency. Penetratin had an affinity of 10 nM for WT cells and µM for SA(neg) and GAG(neg) cells and model membrane of phospholipids. The remaining membrane-bound penetratin after cells washings was similar in WT and GAG(neg) cells, which suggested that these binding sites relied on membrane phospholipids. The interaction of penetratin with carbohydrates was more superficial and reversible while it was stronger with phospholipids, likely because the peptide can intercalate between the fatty acid chains. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: These results show that accumulation and high-affinity binding of penetratin at the cell-surface do not reflect the internalization efficacy of the peptide. Altogether, these data further support translocation (membrane phospholipids interaction) as being the internalization pathway used by penetratin at low micromolecular concentration, while endocytosis is activated at higher concentration and requires accumulation of the peptide on GAG and GAG clustering. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3167814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31678142011-09-13 Relationships between Membrane Binding, Affinity and Cell Internalization Efficacy of a Cell-Penetrating Peptide: Penetratin as a Case Study Alves, Isabel D. Bechara, Cherine Walrant, Astrid Zaltsman, Yefim Jiao, Chen-Yu Sagan, Sandrine PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Penetratin is a positively charged cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) that has the ability to bind negatively charged membrane components, such as glycosaminoglycans and anionic lipids. Whether this primary interaction of penetratin with these cell surface components implies that the peptide will be further internalized is not clear. METHODOLOGY: Using mass spectrometry, the amount of internalized and membrane bound penetratin remaining after washings, were quantified in three different cell lines: wild type (WT), glycosaminoglycans- (GAG(neg)) and sialic acid-deficient (SA(neg)) cells. Additionally, the affinity and kinetics of the interaction of penetratin to membrane models composed of pure lipids and membrane fragments from the referred cell lines was investigated, as well as the thermodynamics of such interactions using plasmon resonance and calorimetry. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Penetratin internalized with the same efficacy in the three cell lines at 1 µM, but was better internalized at 10 µM in SA(neg)>WT>GAG(neg). The heat released by the interaction of penetratin with these cells followed the ranking order of internalization efficiency. Penetratin had an affinity of 10 nM for WT cells and µM for SA(neg) and GAG(neg) cells and model membrane of phospholipids. The remaining membrane-bound penetratin after cells washings was similar in WT and GAG(neg) cells, which suggested that these binding sites relied on membrane phospholipids. The interaction of penetratin with carbohydrates was more superficial and reversible while it was stronger with phospholipids, likely because the peptide can intercalate between the fatty acid chains. CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: These results show that accumulation and high-affinity binding of penetratin at the cell-surface do not reflect the internalization efficacy of the peptide. Altogether, these data further support translocation (membrane phospholipids interaction) as being the internalization pathway used by penetratin at low micromolecular concentration, while endocytosis is activated at higher concentration and requires accumulation of the peptide on GAG and GAG clustering. Public Library of Science 2011-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3167814/ /pubmed/21915283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024096 Text en Alves et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Alves, Isabel D. Bechara, Cherine Walrant, Astrid Zaltsman, Yefim Jiao, Chen-Yu Sagan, Sandrine Relationships between Membrane Binding, Affinity and Cell Internalization Efficacy of a Cell-Penetrating Peptide: Penetratin as a Case Study |
title | Relationships between Membrane Binding, Affinity and Cell Internalization Efficacy of a Cell-Penetrating Peptide: Penetratin as a Case Study |
title_full | Relationships between Membrane Binding, Affinity and Cell Internalization Efficacy of a Cell-Penetrating Peptide: Penetratin as a Case Study |
title_fullStr | Relationships between Membrane Binding, Affinity and Cell Internalization Efficacy of a Cell-Penetrating Peptide: Penetratin as a Case Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Relationships between Membrane Binding, Affinity and Cell Internalization Efficacy of a Cell-Penetrating Peptide: Penetratin as a Case Study |
title_short | Relationships between Membrane Binding, Affinity and Cell Internalization Efficacy of a Cell-Penetrating Peptide: Penetratin as a Case Study |
title_sort | relationships between membrane binding, affinity and cell internalization efficacy of a cell-penetrating peptide: penetratin as a case study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3167814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21915283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024096 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alvesisabeld relationshipsbetweenmembranebindingaffinityandcellinternalizationefficacyofacellpenetratingpeptidepenetratinasacasestudy AT becharacherine relationshipsbetweenmembranebindingaffinityandcellinternalizationefficacyofacellpenetratingpeptidepenetratinasacasestudy AT walrantastrid relationshipsbetweenmembranebindingaffinityandcellinternalizationefficacyofacellpenetratingpeptidepenetratinasacasestudy AT zaltsmanyefim relationshipsbetweenmembranebindingaffinityandcellinternalizationefficacyofacellpenetratingpeptidepenetratinasacasestudy AT jiaochenyu relationshipsbetweenmembranebindingaffinityandcellinternalizationefficacyofacellpenetratingpeptidepenetratinasacasestudy AT sagansandrine relationshipsbetweenmembranebindingaffinityandcellinternalizationefficacyofacellpenetratingpeptidepenetratinasacasestudy |