Cargando…

Meta-Analysis of the Immunogenicity and Tolerability of Pandemic Influenza A 2009 (H1N1) Vaccines

BACKGROUND: Although the 2009 (H1N1) influenza pandemic officially ended in August 2010, the virus will probably circulate in future years. Several types of H1N1 vaccines have been tested including various dosages and adjuvants, and meta-analysis is needed to identify the best formulation. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manzoli, Lamberto, De Vito, Corrado, Salanti, Georgia, D'Addario, Maddalena, Villari, Paolo, Ioannidis, John P.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3167852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21915319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024384
_version_ 1782211299584770048
author Manzoli, Lamberto
De Vito, Corrado
Salanti, Georgia
D'Addario, Maddalena
Villari, Paolo
Ioannidis, John P.A.
author_facet Manzoli, Lamberto
De Vito, Corrado
Salanti, Georgia
D'Addario, Maddalena
Villari, Paolo
Ioannidis, John P.A.
author_sort Manzoli, Lamberto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the 2009 (H1N1) influenza pandemic officially ended in August 2010, the virus will probably circulate in future years. Several types of H1N1 vaccines have been tested including various dosages and adjuvants, and meta-analysis is needed to identify the best formulation. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and nine clinical trial registries to April 2011, in any language for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on healthy children, adolescents, adults and the elderly. Primary outcome was the seroconversion rate according to hemagglutinination-inhibition (HI); secondary outcomes were adverse events. For the primary outcome, we used head-to-head meta-analysis and multiple-treatments meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs could be included in all primary analyses, for a total of 76 arms (16,725 subjects). After 2 doses, all 2009 H1N1 split/subunit inactivated vaccines were highly immunogenic and overcome CPMP seroconversion criteria. After 1 dose only, all split/subunit vaccines induced a satisfactory immunogenicity (> = 70%) in adults and adolescents, while only some formulations showed acceptable results for children and elderly (non-adjuvanted at high-doses and oil-in-water adjuvanted vaccines). Vaccines with oil-in-water adjuvants were more immunogenic than both nonadjuvanted and aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines at equal doses and their immunogenicity at doses < = 6 µg (even with as little as 1.875 µg of hemagglutinin antigen) was not significantly lower than that achieved after higher doses. Finally, the rate of serious vaccine-related adverse events was low for all 2009 H1N1 vaccines (3 cases, resolved in 10 days, out of 22826 vaccinated subjects). However, mild to moderate adverse reactions were more (and very) frequent for oil-in-water adjuvanted vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: Several one-dose formulations might be valid for future vaccines, but 2 doses may be needed for children, especially if a low-dose non-adjuvanted vaccine is used. Given that 15 RCTs were sponsored by vaccine manufacturers, future trials sponsored by non-industry agencies and comparing vaccines using different types of adjuvants are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3167852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31678522011-09-13 Meta-Analysis of the Immunogenicity and Tolerability of Pandemic Influenza A 2009 (H1N1) Vaccines Manzoli, Lamberto De Vito, Corrado Salanti, Georgia D'Addario, Maddalena Villari, Paolo Ioannidis, John P.A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Although the 2009 (H1N1) influenza pandemic officially ended in August 2010, the virus will probably circulate in future years. Several types of H1N1 vaccines have been tested including various dosages and adjuvants, and meta-analysis is needed to identify the best formulation. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and nine clinical trial registries to April 2011, in any language for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on healthy children, adolescents, adults and the elderly. Primary outcome was the seroconversion rate according to hemagglutinination-inhibition (HI); secondary outcomes were adverse events. For the primary outcome, we used head-to-head meta-analysis and multiple-treatments meta-analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs could be included in all primary analyses, for a total of 76 arms (16,725 subjects). After 2 doses, all 2009 H1N1 split/subunit inactivated vaccines were highly immunogenic and overcome CPMP seroconversion criteria. After 1 dose only, all split/subunit vaccines induced a satisfactory immunogenicity (> = 70%) in adults and adolescents, while only some formulations showed acceptable results for children and elderly (non-adjuvanted at high-doses and oil-in-water adjuvanted vaccines). Vaccines with oil-in-water adjuvants were more immunogenic than both nonadjuvanted and aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines at equal doses and their immunogenicity at doses < = 6 µg (even with as little as 1.875 µg of hemagglutinin antigen) was not significantly lower than that achieved after higher doses. Finally, the rate of serious vaccine-related adverse events was low for all 2009 H1N1 vaccines (3 cases, resolved in 10 days, out of 22826 vaccinated subjects). However, mild to moderate adverse reactions were more (and very) frequent for oil-in-water adjuvanted vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: Several one-dose formulations might be valid for future vaccines, but 2 doses may be needed for children, especially if a low-dose non-adjuvanted vaccine is used. Given that 15 RCTs were sponsored by vaccine manufacturers, future trials sponsored by non-industry agencies and comparing vaccines using different types of adjuvants are needed. Public Library of Science 2011-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3167852/ /pubmed/21915319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024384 Text en Manzoli et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Manzoli, Lamberto
De Vito, Corrado
Salanti, Georgia
D'Addario, Maddalena
Villari, Paolo
Ioannidis, John P.A.
Meta-Analysis of the Immunogenicity and Tolerability of Pandemic Influenza A 2009 (H1N1) Vaccines
title Meta-Analysis of the Immunogenicity and Tolerability of Pandemic Influenza A 2009 (H1N1) Vaccines
title_full Meta-Analysis of the Immunogenicity and Tolerability of Pandemic Influenza A 2009 (H1N1) Vaccines
title_fullStr Meta-Analysis of the Immunogenicity and Tolerability of Pandemic Influenza A 2009 (H1N1) Vaccines
title_full_unstemmed Meta-Analysis of the Immunogenicity and Tolerability of Pandemic Influenza A 2009 (H1N1) Vaccines
title_short Meta-Analysis of the Immunogenicity and Tolerability of Pandemic Influenza A 2009 (H1N1) Vaccines
title_sort meta-analysis of the immunogenicity and tolerability of pandemic influenza a 2009 (h1n1) vaccines
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3167852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21915319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024384
work_keys_str_mv AT manzolilamberto metaanalysisoftheimmunogenicityandtolerabilityofpandemicinfluenzaa2009h1n1vaccines
AT devitocorrado metaanalysisoftheimmunogenicityandtolerabilityofpandemicinfluenzaa2009h1n1vaccines
AT salantigeorgia metaanalysisoftheimmunogenicityandtolerabilityofpandemicinfluenzaa2009h1n1vaccines
AT daddariomaddalena metaanalysisoftheimmunogenicityandtolerabilityofpandemicinfluenzaa2009h1n1vaccines
AT villaripaolo metaanalysisoftheimmunogenicityandtolerabilityofpandemicinfluenzaa2009h1n1vaccines
AT ioannidisjohnpa metaanalysisoftheimmunogenicityandtolerabilityofpandemicinfluenzaa2009h1n1vaccines