Cargando…

Comparison of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA™) with the laryngeal mask airway Proseal™ for lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries in paralyzed, anesthetized patients

CONTEXT: Supraglottic airway devices have been used as an alternative to tracheal intubation during laparoscopic surgery. AIMS: The study was designed to compare the efficacy of Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA) for positive pressure ventilation and postoperative complications with the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdellatif, Ashraf Abualhassan, Ali, Monaz Abdulrahman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3168343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21957405
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.84100
_version_ 1782211371692195840
author Abdellatif, Ashraf Abualhassan
Ali, Monaz Abdulrahman
author_facet Abdellatif, Ashraf Abualhassan
Ali, Monaz Abdulrahman
author_sort Abdellatif, Ashraf Abualhassan
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Supraglottic airway devices have been used as an alternative to tracheal intubation during laparoscopic surgery. AIMS: The study was designed to compare the efficacy of Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA) for positive pressure ventilation and postoperative complications with the Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSeal (PLMA) for patients undergoing lower abdominal laparoscopies under general anesthesia with controlled ventilation. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective, crossover randomized controlled trial performed on patients undergoing lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries. METHODS: A total of 120 patients undergoing lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries were randomly allocated into two equal groups; PLMA and SLIPA groups. Number of intubation attempts, insertion time, ease of insertion, and fiberoptic bronchoscopic view were recorded. Lung mechanics data were collected 5 minutes after securing the airway, then after abdominal insufflation. Blood traces and regurgitation were checked for; postoperative sore throat and other complications were recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Arithmetic mean and standard deviation values were calculated and statistical analyses were performed for each group. Independent sample t-test was used to compare continuous variables exhibiting normal distribution, and Chi-squared test for noncontinuous variables. P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Insertion time, first insertion success rate, and ease of insertion were comparable in both groups. Fiberoptic bronchoscopic view was significantly better and epiglottic downfolding was significantly lower in SLIPA group. Sealing pressure and lung mechanics were similar. Gastric distension was not observed in both groups. Postoperative sore throat was significantly higher in PACU in PLMA group. Blood traces on the device were significantly more in SLIPA group. CONCLUSIONS: SLIPA can be used as a useful alternative to PLMA in patients undergoing lower abdominal laparoscopic surgery with muscle relaxant and controlled ventilation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3168343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31683432011-09-28 Comparison of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA™) with the laryngeal mask airway Proseal™ for lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries in paralyzed, anesthetized patients Abdellatif, Ashraf Abualhassan Ali, Monaz Abdulrahman Saudi J Anaesth Original Article CONTEXT: Supraglottic airway devices have been used as an alternative to tracheal intubation during laparoscopic surgery. AIMS: The study was designed to compare the efficacy of Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA) for positive pressure ventilation and postoperative complications with the Laryngeal Mask Airway ProSeal (PLMA) for patients undergoing lower abdominal laparoscopies under general anesthesia with controlled ventilation. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Prospective, crossover randomized controlled trial performed on patients undergoing lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries. METHODS: A total of 120 patients undergoing lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries were randomly allocated into two equal groups; PLMA and SLIPA groups. Number of intubation attempts, insertion time, ease of insertion, and fiberoptic bronchoscopic view were recorded. Lung mechanics data were collected 5 minutes after securing the airway, then after abdominal insufflation. Blood traces and regurgitation were checked for; postoperative sore throat and other complications were recorded. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Arithmetic mean and standard deviation values were calculated and statistical analyses were performed for each group. Independent sample t-test was used to compare continuous variables exhibiting normal distribution, and Chi-squared test for noncontinuous variables. P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Insertion time, first insertion success rate, and ease of insertion were comparable in both groups. Fiberoptic bronchoscopic view was significantly better and epiglottic downfolding was significantly lower in SLIPA group. Sealing pressure and lung mechanics were similar. Gastric distension was not observed in both groups. Postoperative sore throat was significantly higher in PACU in PLMA group. Blood traces on the device were significantly more in SLIPA group. CONCLUSIONS: SLIPA can be used as a useful alternative to PLMA in patients undergoing lower abdominal laparoscopic surgery with muscle relaxant and controlled ventilation. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3168343/ /pubmed/21957405 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.84100 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abdellatif, Ashraf Abualhassan
Ali, Monaz Abdulrahman
Comparison of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA™) with the laryngeal mask airway Proseal™ for lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries in paralyzed, anesthetized patients
title Comparison of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA™) with the laryngeal mask airway Proseal™ for lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries in paralyzed, anesthetized patients
title_full Comparison of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA™) with the laryngeal mask airway Proseal™ for lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries in paralyzed, anesthetized patients
title_fullStr Comparison of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA™) with the laryngeal mask airway Proseal™ for lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries in paralyzed, anesthetized patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA™) with the laryngeal mask airway Proseal™ for lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries in paralyzed, anesthetized patients
title_short Comparison of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA™) with the laryngeal mask airway Proseal™ for lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries in paralyzed, anesthetized patients
title_sort comparison of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (slipa™) with the laryngeal mask airway proseal™ for lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries in paralyzed, anesthetized patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3168343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21957405
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.84100
work_keys_str_mv AT abdellatifashrafabualhassan comparisonofstreamlinedlinerofthepharynxairwayslipawiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealforlowerabdominallaparoscopicsurgeriesinparalyzedanesthetizedpatients
AT alimonazabdulrahman comparisonofstreamlinedlinerofthepharynxairwayslipawiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealforlowerabdominallaparoscopicsurgeriesinparalyzedanesthetizedpatients