Cargando…
A single-centre randomized-controlled trial to study effect of dilution on propofol-induced injection pain at injection site
BACKGROUND: Propofol is a commonly used short-acting intravenous anaesthetic agent. A major disadvantage of propofol is pain at injection site with high incidence up to 90%. Various modalities have been tried to obtund propofol-induced pain; however, search for an ideal agent continues. We assessed...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3168345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21957407 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.84102 |
_version_ | 1782211372156715008 |
---|---|
author | Aggarwal, Sourabh Kumar, Mahendra Sharma, Vishal |
author_facet | Aggarwal, Sourabh Kumar, Mahendra Sharma, Vishal |
author_sort | Aggarwal, Sourabh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Propofol is a commonly used short-acting intravenous anaesthetic agent. A major disadvantage of propofol is pain at injection site with high incidence up to 90%. Various modalities have been tried to obtund propofol-induced pain; however, search for an ideal agent continues. We assessed the effect of double and triple dilution of 1% propofol emulsion with normal saline on pain at injection site. METHODS: This randomized, double-blinded study was done on 60 adult patients of both sexes, belonging to ASA grade I and II scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia, divided into three groups named I, II, III of 20 patients each. The patients of group I, II, and III received 1% propofol 2 ml, 0.5% propofol 4 ml, and 0.33% propofol 6 ml, respectively, over a period of 4 s and pain felt was assessed. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the pain score in group II as compared to patients in group I. However, there was a statistically significant decrease in the pain score in group III as compared to patients in group I (P value 0.02) and group II (P value 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant decrease in both incidence and severity of pain during injection with a 0.33% propofol solution without significant adverse hemodynamic effects. The small size of data was a limitation in our study and a large-scale study will be needed to prove its therapeutic beneficence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3168345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Medknow Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31683452011-09-28 A single-centre randomized-controlled trial to study effect of dilution on propofol-induced injection pain at injection site Aggarwal, Sourabh Kumar, Mahendra Sharma, Vishal Saudi J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: Propofol is a commonly used short-acting intravenous anaesthetic agent. A major disadvantage of propofol is pain at injection site with high incidence up to 90%. Various modalities have been tried to obtund propofol-induced pain; however, search for an ideal agent continues. We assessed the effect of double and triple dilution of 1% propofol emulsion with normal saline on pain at injection site. METHODS: This randomized, double-blinded study was done on 60 adult patients of both sexes, belonging to ASA grade I and II scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia, divided into three groups named I, II, III of 20 patients each. The patients of group I, II, and III received 1% propofol 2 ml, 0.5% propofol 4 ml, and 0.33% propofol 6 ml, respectively, over a period of 4 s and pain felt was assessed. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the pain score in group II as compared to patients in group I. However, there was a statistically significant decrease in the pain score in group III as compared to patients in group I (P value 0.02) and group II (P value 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant decrease in both incidence and severity of pain during injection with a 0.33% propofol solution without significant adverse hemodynamic effects. The small size of data was a limitation in our study and a large-scale study will be needed to prove its therapeutic beneficence. Medknow Publications 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3168345/ /pubmed/21957407 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.84102 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Aggarwal, Sourabh Kumar, Mahendra Sharma, Vishal A single-centre randomized-controlled trial to study effect of dilution on propofol-induced injection pain at injection site |
title | A single-centre randomized-controlled trial to study effect of dilution on propofol-induced injection pain at injection site |
title_full | A single-centre randomized-controlled trial to study effect of dilution on propofol-induced injection pain at injection site |
title_fullStr | A single-centre randomized-controlled trial to study effect of dilution on propofol-induced injection pain at injection site |
title_full_unstemmed | A single-centre randomized-controlled trial to study effect of dilution on propofol-induced injection pain at injection site |
title_short | A single-centre randomized-controlled trial to study effect of dilution on propofol-induced injection pain at injection site |
title_sort | single-centre randomized-controlled trial to study effect of dilution on propofol-induced injection pain at injection site |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3168345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21957407 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.84102 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aggarwalsourabh asinglecentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialtostudyeffectofdilutiononpropofolinducedinjectionpainatinjectionsite AT kumarmahendra asinglecentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialtostudyeffectofdilutiononpropofolinducedinjectionpainatinjectionsite AT sharmavishal asinglecentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialtostudyeffectofdilutiononpropofolinducedinjectionpainatinjectionsite AT aggarwalsourabh singlecentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialtostudyeffectofdilutiononpropofolinducedinjectionpainatinjectionsite AT kumarmahendra singlecentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialtostudyeffectofdilutiononpropofolinducedinjectionpainatinjectionsite AT sharmavishal singlecentrerandomizedcontrolledtrialtostudyeffectofdilutiononpropofolinducedinjectionpainatinjectionsite |