Cargando…

Long-Term Followup with Evaluation of the Surgical and Functional Results of the Ileal Pouch Reservoir in Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis

Aims. Evaluate the early and long term surgical and functional results of the ileal pouch-reservoir (IPAA) in patients with intractable ulcerative colitis. Material and Methods. Followup of 134 consecutive patients with W-or J-ileal pouch by diseases-specific and general health (SF-36) questionnaire...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Røkke, Ola, Iversen, Knut, Olsen, Torill, Ristesund, Sølvi-Mai, Eide, Geir Egil, Turowski, Gitta Erika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scholarly Research Network 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3168493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21991523
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/625842
_version_ 1782211404993921024
author Røkke, Ola
Iversen, Knut
Olsen, Torill
Ristesund, Sølvi-Mai
Eide, Geir Egil
Turowski, Gitta Erika
author_facet Røkke, Ola
Iversen, Knut
Olsen, Torill
Ristesund, Sølvi-Mai
Eide, Geir Egil
Turowski, Gitta Erika
author_sort Røkke, Ola
collection PubMed
description Aims. Evaluate the early and long term surgical and functional results of the ileal pouch-reservoir (IPAA) in patients with intractable ulcerative colitis. Material and Methods. Followup of 134 consecutive patients with W-or J-ileal pouch by diseases-specific and general health (SF-36) questionnaire. In the first 44 patients, early and late followup was performed. Results. Followup was performed 7.4 years (0.5–17 years) after construction of W (n = 9) and J (n = 125) ileal pouch, which had similar results. There were 14.9% early and 43.6% late complications with 12.7% early and 19.5% late reoperations. Protecting loop-ileostomy used in 54 patients (43.9%), did not protect against complications. Thirteen reservoirs (9.8%) were resected (n = 8) or deactivated (n = 5) due to functional failure. Operation time, postoperative complications and pouchitis were determinators for reservoir failure and reduced quality of life. The functional results at followup of 44 patients at 2.5 years (0.8–6.7 years) and 11.5 years (8.2–19.2 years) were remarkably similar. Conclusions. IPAA is a good option for most patients when medication fails. 10% experience failure with inferior quality of life. Protective stoma will not reduce failure rates. After an initial time period, reservoir function will not change over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3168493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher International Scholarly Research Network
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31684932011-10-11 Long-Term Followup with Evaluation of the Surgical and Functional Results of the Ileal Pouch Reservoir in Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis Røkke, Ola Iversen, Knut Olsen, Torill Ristesund, Sølvi-Mai Eide, Geir Egil Turowski, Gitta Erika ISRN Gastroenterol Clinical Study Aims. Evaluate the early and long term surgical and functional results of the ileal pouch-reservoir (IPAA) in patients with intractable ulcerative colitis. Material and Methods. Followup of 134 consecutive patients with W-or J-ileal pouch by diseases-specific and general health (SF-36) questionnaire. In the first 44 patients, early and late followup was performed. Results. Followup was performed 7.4 years (0.5–17 years) after construction of W (n = 9) and J (n = 125) ileal pouch, which had similar results. There were 14.9% early and 43.6% late complications with 12.7% early and 19.5% late reoperations. Protecting loop-ileostomy used in 54 patients (43.9%), did not protect against complications. Thirteen reservoirs (9.8%) were resected (n = 8) or deactivated (n = 5) due to functional failure. Operation time, postoperative complications and pouchitis were determinators for reservoir failure and reduced quality of life. The functional results at followup of 44 patients at 2.5 years (0.8–6.7 years) and 11.5 years (8.2–19.2 years) were remarkably similar. Conclusions. IPAA is a good option for most patients when medication fails. 10% experience failure with inferior quality of life. Protective stoma will not reduce failure rates. After an initial time period, reservoir function will not change over time. International Scholarly Research Network 2011 2011-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3168493/ /pubmed/21991523 http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/625842 Text en Copyright © 2011 Ola Røkke et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Røkke, Ola
Iversen, Knut
Olsen, Torill
Ristesund, Sølvi-Mai
Eide, Geir Egil
Turowski, Gitta Erika
Long-Term Followup with Evaluation of the Surgical and Functional Results of the Ileal Pouch Reservoir in Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis
title Long-Term Followup with Evaluation of the Surgical and Functional Results of the Ileal Pouch Reservoir in Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis
title_full Long-Term Followup with Evaluation of the Surgical and Functional Results of the Ileal Pouch Reservoir in Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis
title_fullStr Long-Term Followup with Evaluation of the Surgical and Functional Results of the Ileal Pouch Reservoir in Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Followup with Evaluation of the Surgical and Functional Results of the Ileal Pouch Reservoir in Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis
title_short Long-Term Followup with Evaluation of the Surgical and Functional Results of the Ileal Pouch Reservoir in Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis
title_sort long-term followup with evaluation of the surgical and functional results of the ileal pouch reservoir in restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3168493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21991523
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/625842
work_keys_str_mv AT røkkeola longtermfollowupwithevaluationofthesurgicalandfunctionalresultsoftheilealpouchreservoirinrestorativeproctocolectomyforulcerativecolitis
AT iversenknut longtermfollowupwithevaluationofthesurgicalandfunctionalresultsoftheilealpouchreservoirinrestorativeproctocolectomyforulcerativecolitis
AT olsentorill longtermfollowupwithevaluationofthesurgicalandfunctionalresultsoftheilealpouchreservoirinrestorativeproctocolectomyforulcerativecolitis
AT ristesundsølvimai longtermfollowupwithevaluationofthesurgicalandfunctionalresultsoftheilealpouchreservoirinrestorativeproctocolectomyforulcerativecolitis
AT eidegeiregil longtermfollowupwithevaluationofthesurgicalandfunctionalresultsoftheilealpouchreservoirinrestorativeproctocolectomyforulcerativecolitis
AT turowskigittaerika longtermfollowupwithevaluationofthesurgicalandfunctionalresultsoftheilealpouchreservoirinrestorativeproctocolectomyforulcerativecolitis