Cargando…

Residual confounding after adjustment for age: a minor issue in breast cancer screening effectiveness

Residual confounding, after adjustment for age, is the major criticism of observational studies on breast cancer screening effectiveness. We developed realistic scenarios for the prevalence and strength of risk factors on screened and not screened groups, and explored the impact of residual confound...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Schoor, Guido, Paap, Ellen, Broeders, Mireille J. M., Verbeek, André L. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3168749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21519892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-011-9584-3
_version_ 1782211418460782592
author van Schoor, Guido
Paap, Ellen
Broeders, Mireille J. M.
Verbeek, André L. M.
author_facet van Schoor, Guido
Paap, Ellen
Broeders, Mireille J. M.
Verbeek, André L. M.
author_sort van Schoor, Guido
collection PubMed
description Residual confounding, after adjustment for age, is the major criticism of observational studies on breast cancer screening effectiveness. We developed realistic scenarios for the prevalence and strength of risk factors on screened and not screened groups, and explored the impact of residual confounding bias. Our results demonstrate that residual confounding bias is a minor issue in screening programme evaluations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3168749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31687492011-09-26 Residual confounding after adjustment for age: a minor issue in breast cancer screening effectiveness van Schoor, Guido Paap, Ellen Broeders, Mireille J. M. Verbeek, André L. M. Eur J Epidemiol Commentary Residual confounding, after adjustment for age, is the major criticism of observational studies on breast cancer screening effectiveness. We developed realistic scenarios for the prevalence and strength of risk factors on screened and not screened groups, and explored the impact of residual confounding bias. Our results demonstrate that residual confounding bias is a minor issue in screening programme evaluations. Springer Netherlands 2011-04-26 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3168749/ /pubmed/21519892 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-011-9584-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Commentary
van Schoor, Guido
Paap, Ellen
Broeders, Mireille J. M.
Verbeek, André L. M.
Residual confounding after adjustment for age: a minor issue in breast cancer screening effectiveness
title Residual confounding after adjustment for age: a minor issue in breast cancer screening effectiveness
title_full Residual confounding after adjustment for age: a minor issue in breast cancer screening effectiveness
title_fullStr Residual confounding after adjustment for age: a minor issue in breast cancer screening effectiveness
title_full_unstemmed Residual confounding after adjustment for age: a minor issue in breast cancer screening effectiveness
title_short Residual confounding after adjustment for age: a minor issue in breast cancer screening effectiveness
title_sort residual confounding after adjustment for age: a minor issue in breast cancer screening effectiveness
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3168749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21519892
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-011-9584-3
work_keys_str_mv AT vanschoorguido residualconfoundingafteradjustmentforageaminorissueinbreastcancerscreeningeffectiveness
AT paapellen residualconfoundingafteradjustmentforageaminorissueinbreastcancerscreeningeffectiveness
AT broedersmireillejm residualconfoundingafteradjustmentforageaminorissueinbreastcancerscreeningeffectiveness
AT verbeekandrelm residualconfoundingafteradjustmentforageaminorissueinbreastcancerscreeningeffectiveness