Cargando…
Comparison of Movement of the Upper Dentition According to Anchorage Method: Orthodontic Mini-Implant versus Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement in Class I Malocclusion
Objective. To compare the amounts of anchorage loss in the upper first molar (U6) and of retraction of the upper central incisor (U1) in cases with Class I malocclusion between orthodontic mini-implants (OMIs) and conventional anchorage reinforcements (CARs). Methods. The subjects were 40 female adu...
Autores principales: | Lee, Ah-Young, Kim, Young Ho |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scholarly Research Network
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3169901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21991465 http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/321206 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Meta-analysis dataset comparing orthodontic mini-implants and conventional anchorage reinforcement for maximum orthodontic anchorage
por: Li, Gui-Feng, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Preliminary three-dimensional analysis of tooth movement and arch dimension change of the maxillary dentition in Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with first premolar extraction: conventional anchorage vs. mini-implant anchorage
por: Park, Heon-Mook, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Three-dimensional evaluation of tooth movement in Class II malocclusions treated without extraction by orthodontic mini-implant anchorage
por: Ali, Dler, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Mini-Implants in the Anchorage Armamentarium: New Paradigms in the Orthodontics
por: Yamaguchi, Masaru, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Implants for orthodontic anchorage: An overview
por: Zheng, Xiaowen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)