Cargando…

A cost-effectiveness analysis of different therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B in Italy

INTRODUCTION: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a prevalent disease associated with high morbidity, mortality, and impact on health care costs. Antiviral therapy is aimed at reducing hepatitis B virus replication in order to limit progressive liver disease and improve the natural history of the disease....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colombo, Giorgio L, Gaeta, Giovanni B, Viganò, Mauro, Di Matteo, Sergio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3169981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21935331
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S16655
_version_ 1782211561156247552
author Colombo, Giorgio L
Gaeta, Giovanni B
Viganò, Mauro
Di Matteo, Sergio
author_facet Colombo, Giorgio L
Gaeta, Giovanni B
Viganò, Mauro
Di Matteo, Sergio
author_sort Colombo, Giorgio L
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a prevalent disease associated with high morbidity, mortality, and impact on health care costs. Antiviral therapy is aimed at reducing hepatitis B virus replication in order to limit progressive liver disease and improve the natural history of the disease. This study estimates the cost-effectiveness of lamivudine, adefovir, telbivudine, entecavir, tenofovir, and pegylated interferon in patients with CHB. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to evaluate the costs and benefits of antivirals in a cohort of patients with CHB (hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]-positive and HBeAg-negative) and cirrhosis over a period of 10 years. Different rescue therapies were considered, according to current guidelines. Data on efficacy and changes in quality of life were derived from clinical trials and epidemiological Italian data. Direct costs were assessed from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service. RESULTS: Tenofovir was associated with lower costs and higher efficacy compared with entecavir, telbivudine, and adefovir, as shown by their incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained: tenofovir €30,959, entecavir €45,971, telbivudine €62,051, and adefovir €82,824. Even following 1 year of pegylated interferon therapy, tenofovir had a more favourable ICER per QALY gained compared with the other rescue options. The analysis of patients with cirrhosis confirms the results obtained with the CHB cohort though with higher ICERs. Sensitivity analyses on the main variables confirm the results of the base case scenario. CONCLUSION: Within the Italian health care system, in patients with CHB, tenofovir is a cost-effective strategy compared with other available therapies. Public health care authorities would benefit from mathematical models designed to estimate the future burden of CHB infection together with the impact of treatment and drug resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3169981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31699812011-09-20 A cost-effectiveness analysis of different therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B in Italy Colombo, Giorgio L Gaeta, Giovanni B Viganò, Mauro Di Matteo, Sergio Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Review INTRODUCTION: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a prevalent disease associated with high morbidity, mortality, and impact on health care costs. Antiviral therapy is aimed at reducing hepatitis B virus replication in order to limit progressive liver disease and improve the natural history of the disease. This study estimates the cost-effectiveness of lamivudine, adefovir, telbivudine, entecavir, tenofovir, and pegylated interferon in patients with CHB. METHODS: A Markov model was developed to evaluate the costs and benefits of antivirals in a cohort of patients with CHB (hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]-positive and HBeAg-negative) and cirrhosis over a period of 10 years. Different rescue therapies were considered, according to current guidelines. Data on efficacy and changes in quality of life were derived from clinical trials and epidemiological Italian data. Direct costs were assessed from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service. RESULTS: Tenofovir was associated with lower costs and higher efficacy compared with entecavir, telbivudine, and adefovir, as shown by their incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained: tenofovir €30,959, entecavir €45,971, telbivudine €62,051, and adefovir €82,824. Even following 1 year of pegylated interferon therapy, tenofovir had a more favourable ICER per QALY gained compared with the other rescue options. The analysis of patients with cirrhosis confirms the results obtained with the CHB cohort though with higher ICERs. Sensitivity analyses on the main variables confirm the results of the base case scenario. CONCLUSION: Within the Italian health care system, in patients with CHB, tenofovir is a cost-effective strategy compared with other available therapies. Public health care authorities would benefit from mathematical models designed to estimate the future burden of CHB infection together with the impact of treatment and drug resistance. Dove Medical Press 2011-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3169981/ /pubmed/21935331 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S16655 Text en © 2011 Colombo et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Colombo, Giorgio L
Gaeta, Giovanni B
Viganò, Mauro
Di Matteo, Sergio
A cost-effectiveness analysis of different therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B in Italy
title A cost-effectiveness analysis of different therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B in Italy
title_full A cost-effectiveness analysis of different therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B in Italy
title_fullStr A cost-effectiveness analysis of different therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B in Italy
title_full_unstemmed A cost-effectiveness analysis of different therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B in Italy
title_short A cost-effectiveness analysis of different therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B in Italy
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of different therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis b in italy
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3169981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21935331
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S16655
work_keys_str_mv AT colombogiorgiol acosteffectivenessanalysisofdifferenttherapiesinpatientswithchronichepatitisbinitaly
AT gaetagiovannib acosteffectivenessanalysisofdifferenttherapiesinpatientswithchronichepatitisbinitaly
AT viganomauro acosteffectivenessanalysisofdifferenttherapiesinpatientswithchronichepatitisbinitaly
AT dimatteosergio acosteffectivenessanalysisofdifferenttherapiesinpatientswithchronichepatitisbinitaly
AT colombogiorgiol costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferenttherapiesinpatientswithchronichepatitisbinitaly
AT gaetagiovannib costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferenttherapiesinpatientswithchronichepatitisbinitaly
AT viganomauro costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferenttherapiesinpatientswithchronichepatitisbinitaly
AT dimatteosergio costeffectivenessanalysisofdifferenttherapiesinpatientswithchronichepatitisbinitaly