Cargando…

Flawed methods explain the effect of mammography screening in Nijmegen

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Jørgensen, K J
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Nature Publishing Group 2011
Materias:	Letter to the Editor
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3170964/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21792194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.264

Ejemplares similares

Reply: Flawed methods explain the effect of mammography screening in Nijmegen
por: Verbeek, A L M, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

The predictive value of positive test results in screening for breast cancer by mammography in the Nijmegen programme.
por: Peeters, P. H., et al.
Publicado: (1987)

Flawed disinfectant recommendations during a pandemic
por: Glasbey, Trevor O., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical and laboratory diversity of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas in children with Nijmegen breakage syndrome
por: Pastorczak, Agata, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Yet Another Flawed “Placebo Controlled” Study in Crohn's Disease?
por: Greenstein, Robert J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Postpartum mental health study flawed by fetal loss omission
por: Reardon, David C.
Publicado: (2015)

South Africa–Cuba medical training programme: flawed but successful
Publicado: (2018)

The occurrence of interval cancers in the Nijmegen screening programme.
por: Peeters, P. H., et al.
Publicado: (1989)

Letter to the Editor of the Journal of Artificial Organs: The flaws in the detail of describing methods, comparing patient cohorts and interpreting results
por: Maier, Sven, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clarifications concerning the commentary “Published analysis of contraceptive effectiveness of Daysy and DaysyView app is fatally flawed”
por: Koch, Martin C., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Wisconsin card sorting test performance impairment in schizophrenia: Flaws in a report
por: Parekh, Pravesh, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

NIJMEGEN: Analysis meeting
Publicado: (1978)

Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Critically Ill Patients: Flawed Data and Wrong Conclusions
por: Amini, Richard, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Trustworthy or flawed clinical prediction rule?
por: Granholm, Anders, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Reply to: Comments on “Finding the optimal mammography screening strategy: A cost‐effectiveness analysis of 920 modeled strategies”
por: Kregting, Lindy M., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reply: Improved safety and effectiveness of imaging predicted for MR mammography
por: Kneeshaw, P J, et al.
Publicado: (2004)

Improved safety and effectiveness of imaging predicted for MR mammography
por: Laderoute, M P
Publicado: (2004)

Smoke Screen to Distract From Flawed Science: A Response to Côté et al. Over Criticisms to Their Deficient ‘Rapid Review’ on Chiropractic X-Ray Utility
por: Oakley, Paul A., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Nijmegen breakage syndrome (NBS)
por: Chrzanowska, Krystyna H, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

The Nijmegen Questionnaire and dysfunctional breathing
por: van Dixhoorn, Jan, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Use of the Nijmegen Questionnaire in asthma
por: Thomas, Mike, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Use of the Nijmegen Questionnaire in asthma
por: van Dixhoorn, Jan, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The Thai version of the Nijmegen questionnaire
por: Pakdee, Sirinthip, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

COVID-related upsurge in diagnoses of advanced breast cancer—is a disruption in mammography screening the one to be blamed?
por: Tomasik, B., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Increasing retractions of meta-analyses publications for methodological flaw
por: Chen, Chia-Yun, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence
por: Meirik, O., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Mammographic screening after the age of 65 years: early outcomes in the Nijmegen programme.
por: van Dijck, J., et al.
Publicado: (1996)

Nijmegen breakage syndrome and chronic polyarthritis
por: Pasic, Srdjan, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

NIJMEGEN: PEPR for physics and medical applications
Publicado: (1976)

Response to: Female Genital Mutilation and Obstetric Outcomes: Flawed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Does Not Accurately Reflect the Available Evidence
por: Berg, Rigmor C., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cohort Profile: The Nijmegen Biomedical Study (NBS)
por: Galesloot, Tessel E, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Assessing and Explaining Geographic Variations in Mammography Screening Participation and Breast Cancer Incidence
por: Czwikla, Jonas, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Flawed research methods result in misleading conclusions
por: McLean, Rachael M., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography: Importance of the Assessment of Breast Tumor Size
por: Nicosia, Luca, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Flawed but Willing
por: Dehnugara, Khurshed
Publicado: (2015)

Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome Detected by Newborn Screening for T Cell Receptor Excision Circles (TRECs)
por: Patel, Jay P., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Response to: Pre-referral rectal artesunate in severe malaria: a flawed trial
por: Gomes, Melba F
Publicado: (2011)

Important methodological flaws in the recently published clinical prediction model the REMEMBER score
por: Granholm, Anders, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Comment on: Kuwait National Mammography Screening Program: outcomes of 5 years of screening in Kuwaiti women
por: Kashoo, Faizan Zaffar, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

What Explains Education Disparities in Screening Mammography in the United States? A Comparison with The Netherlands
por: Koç, Hale, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_vffs5b8ccth3i1kjv69u0t2o6s