Cargando…

Implementing a Cancer Fast-track Programme between primary and specialised care in Catalonia (Spain): a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: The Cancer Fast-track Programme's aim was to reduce the time that elapsed between well-founded suspicion of breast, colorectal and lung cancer and the start of initial treatment in Catalonia (Spain). We sought to analyse its implementation and overall effectiveness. METHODS: A quant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prades, J, Espinàs, J A, Font, R, Argimon, J M, Borràs, J M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3171014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21829194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.308
_version_ 1782211704349786112
author Prades, J
Espinàs, J A
Font, R
Argimon, J M
Borràs, J M
author_facet Prades, J
Espinàs, J A
Font, R
Argimon, J M
Borràs, J M
author_sort Prades, J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Cancer Fast-track Programme's aim was to reduce the time that elapsed between well-founded suspicion of breast, colorectal and lung cancer and the start of initial treatment in Catalonia (Spain). We sought to analyse its implementation and overall effectiveness. METHODS: A quantitative analysis of the programme was performed using data generated by the hospitals on the basis of seven fast-track monitoring indicators for the period 2006–2009. In addition, we conducted a qualitative study, based on 83 semistructured interviews with primary and specialised health professionals and health administrators, to obtain their perception of the programme's implementation. RESULTS: About half of all new patients with breast, lung or colorectal cancer were diagnosed via the fast track, though the cancer detection rate declined across the period. Mean time from detection of suspected cancer in primary care to start of initial treatment was 32 days for breast, 30 for colorectal and 37 for lung cancer (2009). Professionals associated with the implementation of the programme showed that general practitioners faced with suspicion of cancer had changed their conduct with the aim of preventing lags. Furthermore, hospitals were found to have pursued three specific implementation strategies (top-down, consensus-based and participatory), which made for the cohesion and sustainability of the circuits. CONCLUSION: The programme has contributed to speeding up diagnostic assessment and treatment of patients with suspicion of cancer, and to clarifying the patient pathway between primary and specialised care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3171014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31710142012-09-06 Implementing a Cancer Fast-track Programme between primary and specialised care in Catalonia (Spain): a mixed methods study Prades, J Espinàs, J A Font, R Argimon, J M Borràs, J M Br J Cancer Clinical Study BACKGROUND: The Cancer Fast-track Programme's aim was to reduce the time that elapsed between well-founded suspicion of breast, colorectal and lung cancer and the start of initial treatment in Catalonia (Spain). We sought to analyse its implementation and overall effectiveness. METHODS: A quantitative analysis of the programme was performed using data generated by the hospitals on the basis of seven fast-track monitoring indicators for the period 2006–2009. In addition, we conducted a qualitative study, based on 83 semistructured interviews with primary and specialised health professionals and health administrators, to obtain their perception of the programme's implementation. RESULTS: About half of all new patients with breast, lung or colorectal cancer were diagnosed via the fast track, though the cancer detection rate declined across the period. Mean time from detection of suspected cancer in primary care to start of initial treatment was 32 days for breast, 30 for colorectal and 37 for lung cancer (2009). Professionals associated with the implementation of the programme showed that general practitioners faced with suspicion of cancer had changed their conduct with the aim of preventing lags. Furthermore, hospitals were found to have pursued three specific implementation strategies (top-down, consensus-based and participatory), which made for the cohesion and sustainability of the circuits. CONCLUSION: The programme has contributed to speeding up diagnostic assessment and treatment of patients with suspicion of cancer, and to clarifying the patient pathway between primary and specialised care. Nature Publishing Group 2011-09-06 2011-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3171014/ /pubmed/21829194 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.308 Text en Copyright © 2011 Cancer Research UK https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Prades, J
Espinàs, J A
Font, R
Argimon, J M
Borràs, J M
Implementing a Cancer Fast-track Programme between primary and specialised care in Catalonia (Spain): a mixed methods study
title Implementing a Cancer Fast-track Programme between primary and specialised care in Catalonia (Spain): a mixed methods study
title_full Implementing a Cancer Fast-track Programme between primary and specialised care in Catalonia (Spain): a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Implementing a Cancer Fast-track Programme between primary and specialised care in Catalonia (Spain): a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Implementing a Cancer Fast-track Programme between primary and specialised care in Catalonia (Spain): a mixed methods study
title_short Implementing a Cancer Fast-track Programme between primary and specialised care in Catalonia (Spain): a mixed methods study
title_sort implementing a cancer fast-track programme between primary and specialised care in catalonia (spain): a mixed methods study
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3171014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21829194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.308
work_keys_str_mv AT pradesj implementingacancerfasttrackprogrammebetweenprimaryandspecialisedcareincataloniaspainamixedmethodsstudy
AT espinasja implementingacancerfasttrackprogrammebetweenprimaryandspecialisedcareincataloniaspainamixedmethodsstudy
AT fontr implementingacancerfasttrackprogrammebetweenprimaryandspecialisedcareincataloniaspainamixedmethodsstudy
AT argimonjm implementingacancerfasttrackprogrammebetweenprimaryandspecialisedcareincataloniaspainamixedmethodsstudy
AT borrasjm implementingacancerfasttrackprogrammebetweenprimaryandspecialisedcareincataloniaspainamixedmethodsstudy