Cargando…
Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography
AIMS: To study the reliability and feasibility of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography (POCKET) at the bedside in patients admitted to a medical department at a non-university hospital. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients were randomized to bedside POCKET examination shortly a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3171198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21810825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jer108 |
_version_ | 1782211726586937344 |
---|---|
author | Andersen, Garrett Newton Haugen, Bjørn Olav Graven, Torbjørn Salvesen, Øyvind Mjølstad, Ole Christian Dalen, Håvard |
author_facet | Andersen, Garrett Newton Haugen, Bjørn Olav Graven, Torbjørn Salvesen, Øyvind Mjølstad, Ole Christian Dalen, Håvard |
author_sort | Andersen, Garrett Newton |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To study the reliability and feasibility of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography (POCKET) at the bedside in patients admitted to a medical department at a non-university hospital. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients were randomized to bedside POCKET examination shortly after admission and later high-end echocardiography (HIGH) in the echo-lab. The POCKET examinations were done by cardiologists on their ward rounds. Assessments of global and regional left ventricular (LV) function, right ventricular (RV) function, valvular function, left atrial (LA) size, the pericardium and pleura were done with respect to effusion and measurements of inferior vena cava (IVC) and abdominal aorta (AA) were performed. Correlations between POCKET and HIGH/appropriate radiological technique for LV function, AA size and presence of pericardial effusion were almost perfect, with r ≥ 0.92. Strong correlation (r ≥ 0.81) was shown for RV and valvular function, except for grading of aortic stenosis (r = 0.62). The correlations were substantial for IVC and LA dimensions. Median time used for bedside screening with POCKET was 4.2 min (range: 2.3–13.0). There was excellent feasibility for cardiac structures and pleura, which was assessed to satisfaction in ≥94% of patients. Lower feasibility (71–79%) was seen for the abdominal great vessels. CONCLUSION: Point-of-care semi-quantitative evaluation of cardiac anatomy and function showed high feasibility and correlation with the reference method for most indices. Pocket-sized echocardiographic examinations of ∼4 min length, performed at the bedside by experts, offers reliable assessment of cardiac structures, the pleural space and the large abdominal vessels. Clinical trial registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; unique ID: NCT01081210. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3171198 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31711982011-09-12 Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography Andersen, Garrett Newton Haugen, Bjørn Olav Graven, Torbjørn Salvesen, Øyvind Mjølstad, Ole Christian Dalen, Håvard Eur J Echocardiogr Clinical/Original Papers AIMS: To study the reliability and feasibility of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography (POCKET) at the bedside in patients admitted to a medical department at a non-university hospital. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients were randomized to bedside POCKET examination shortly after admission and later high-end echocardiography (HIGH) in the echo-lab. The POCKET examinations were done by cardiologists on their ward rounds. Assessments of global and regional left ventricular (LV) function, right ventricular (RV) function, valvular function, left atrial (LA) size, the pericardium and pleura were done with respect to effusion and measurements of inferior vena cava (IVC) and abdominal aorta (AA) were performed. Correlations between POCKET and HIGH/appropriate radiological technique for LV function, AA size and presence of pericardial effusion were almost perfect, with r ≥ 0.92. Strong correlation (r ≥ 0.81) was shown for RV and valvular function, except for grading of aortic stenosis (r = 0.62). The correlations were substantial for IVC and LA dimensions. Median time used for bedside screening with POCKET was 4.2 min (range: 2.3–13.0). There was excellent feasibility for cardiac structures and pleura, which was assessed to satisfaction in ≥94% of patients. Lower feasibility (71–79%) was seen for the abdominal great vessels. CONCLUSION: Point-of-care semi-quantitative evaluation of cardiac anatomy and function showed high feasibility and correlation with the reference method for most indices. Pocket-sized echocardiographic examinations of ∼4 min length, performed at the bedside by experts, offers reliable assessment of cardiac structures, the pleural space and the large abdominal vessels. Clinical trial registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; unique ID: NCT01081210. Oxford University Press 2011-09 2011-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3171198/ /pubmed/21810825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jer108 Text en Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2011. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/uk/ The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal, Learned Society and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Clinical/Original Papers Andersen, Garrett Newton Haugen, Bjørn Olav Graven, Torbjørn Salvesen, Øyvind Mjølstad, Ole Christian Dalen, Håvard Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography |
title | Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography |
title_full | Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography |
title_short | Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography |
title_sort | feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography |
topic | Clinical/Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3171198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21810825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jer108 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersengarrettnewton feasibilityandreliabilityofpointofcarepocketsizedechocardiography AT haugenbjørnolav feasibilityandreliabilityofpointofcarepocketsizedechocardiography AT graventorbjørn feasibilityandreliabilityofpointofcarepocketsizedechocardiography AT salvesenøyvind feasibilityandreliabilityofpointofcarepocketsizedechocardiography AT mjølstadolechristian feasibilityandreliabilityofpointofcarepocketsizedechocardiography AT dalenhavard feasibilityandreliabilityofpointofcarepocketsizedechocardiography |