Cargando…

Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography

AIMS: To study the reliability and feasibility of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography (POCKET) at the bedside in patients admitted to a medical department at a non-university hospital. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients were randomized to bedside POCKET examination shortly a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersen, Garrett Newton, Haugen, Bjørn Olav, Graven, Torbjørn, Salvesen, Øyvind, Mjølstad, Ole Christian, Dalen, Håvard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3171198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21810825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jer108
_version_ 1782211726586937344
author Andersen, Garrett Newton
Haugen, Bjørn Olav
Graven, Torbjørn
Salvesen, Øyvind
Mjølstad, Ole Christian
Dalen, Håvard
author_facet Andersen, Garrett Newton
Haugen, Bjørn Olav
Graven, Torbjørn
Salvesen, Øyvind
Mjølstad, Ole Christian
Dalen, Håvard
author_sort Andersen, Garrett Newton
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To study the reliability and feasibility of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography (POCKET) at the bedside in patients admitted to a medical department at a non-university hospital. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients were randomized to bedside POCKET examination shortly after admission and later high-end echocardiography (HIGH) in the echo-lab. The POCKET examinations were done by cardiologists on their ward rounds. Assessments of global and regional left ventricular (LV) function, right ventricular (RV) function, valvular function, left atrial (LA) size, the pericardium and pleura were done with respect to effusion and measurements of inferior vena cava (IVC) and abdominal aorta (AA) were performed. Correlations between POCKET and HIGH/appropriate radiological technique for LV function, AA size and presence of pericardial effusion were almost perfect, with r ≥ 0.92. Strong correlation (r ≥ 0.81) was shown for RV and valvular function, except for grading of aortic stenosis (r = 0.62). The correlations were substantial for IVC and LA dimensions. Median time used for bedside screening with POCKET was 4.2 min (range: 2.3–13.0). There was excellent feasibility for cardiac structures and pleura, which was assessed to satisfaction in ≥94% of patients. Lower feasibility (71–79%) was seen for the abdominal great vessels. CONCLUSION: Point-of-care semi-quantitative evaluation of cardiac anatomy and function showed high feasibility and correlation with the reference method for most indices. Pocket-sized echocardiographic examinations of ∼4 min length, performed at the bedside by experts, offers reliable assessment of cardiac structures, the pleural space and the large abdominal vessels. Clinical trial registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; unique ID: NCT01081210.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3171198
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31711982011-09-12 Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography Andersen, Garrett Newton Haugen, Bjørn Olav Graven, Torbjørn Salvesen, Øyvind Mjølstad, Ole Christian Dalen, Håvard Eur J Echocardiogr Clinical/Original Papers AIMS: To study the reliability and feasibility of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography (POCKET) at the bedside in patients admitted to a medical department at a non-university hospital. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients were randomized to bedside POCKET examination shortly after admission and later high-end echocardiography (HIGH) in the echo-lab. The POCKET examinations were done by cardiologists on their ward rounds. Assessments of global and regional left ventricular (LV) function, right ventricular (RV) function, valvular function, left atrial (LA) size, the pericardium and pleura were done with respect to effusion and measurements of inferior vena cava (IVC) and abdominal aorta (AA) were performed. Correlations between POCKET and HIGH/appropriate radiological technique for LV function, AA size and presence of pericardial effusion were almost perfect, with r ≥ 0.92. Strong correlation (r ≥ 0.81) was shown for RV and valvular function, except for grading of aortic stenosis (r = 0.62). The correlations were substantial for IVC and LA dimensions. Median time used for bedside screening with POCKET was 4.2 min (range: 2.3–13.0). There was excellent feasibility for cardiac structures and pleura, which was assessed to satisfaction in ≥94% of patients. Lower feasibility (71–79%) was seen for the abdominal great vessels. CONCLUSION: Point-of-care semi-quantitative evaluation of cardiac anatomy and function showed high feasibility and correlation with the reference method for most indices. Pocket-sized echocardiographic examinations of ∼4 min length, performed at the bedside by experts, offers reliable assessment of cardiac structures, the pleural space and the large abdominal vessels. Clinical trial registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; unique ID: NCT01081210. Oxford University Press 2011-09 2011-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3171198/ /pubmed/21810825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jer108 Text en Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2011. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/uk/ The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal, Learned Society and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical/Original Papers
Andersen, Garrett Newton
Haugen, Bjørn Olav
Graven, Torbjørn
Salvesen, Øyvind
Mjølstad, Ole Christian
Dalen, Håvard
Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography
title Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography
title_full Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography
title_fullStr Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography
title_short Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography
title_sort feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography
topic Clinical/Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3171198/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21810825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jer108
work_keys_str_mv AT andersengarrettnewton feasibilityandreliabilityofpointofcarepocketsizedechocardiography
AT haugenbjørnolav feasibilityandreliabilityofpointofcarepocketsizedechocardiography
AT graventorbjørn feasibilityandreliabilityofpointofcarepocketsizedechocardiography
AT salvesenøyvind feasibilityandreliabilityofpointofcarepocketsizedechocardiography
AT mjølstadolechristian feasibilityandreliabilityofpointofcarepocketsizedechocardiography
AT dalenhavard feasibilityandreliabilityofpointofcarepocketsizedechocardiography