Cargando…

Radiotherapy for Japanese elderly patients with cervical cancer: preliminary survival outcomes and evaluation of treatment-related toxicity

PURPOSE: To examine the preliminary survival outcomes and treatment-related toxicity for elderly patients with cervical cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: Forty patients ≥75 years old with cervical cancer who were treated with RT were evaluated. Of these 40 patients, 25 were classified...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoshida, Kenji, Sasaki, Ryohei, Nishimura, Hideki, Miyawaki, Daisuke, Kawabe, Tetsuya, Okamoto, Yoshiaki, Nakabayashi, Koji, Yoshida, Shigeki, Sugimura, Kazuro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3171672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21116639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1777-6
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To examine the preliminary survival outcomes and treatment-related toxicity for elderly patients with cervical cancer treated with radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: Forty patients ≥75 years old with cervical cancer who were treated with RT were evaluated. Of these 40 patients, 25 were classified as FIGO stage I or II and 15 as stage III or IVA. Thirty-five patients were treated with radical RT (RRT), and five were treated with surgery plus adjuvant RT (S + ART). External beam radiotherapy combined with high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy was performed on 31 patients who were treated with RRT and on 2 patients who were treated with S + ART because of positive vaginal surgical margins. The patients’ median age was 78 years (range 75–89 years). Concurrent chemotherapy (CCT) was performed on five patients (RRT: 3, S + ART: 2). RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 20 months (range 1–85 months). Only one patient could not complete RT. The 3-year overall and disease-specific survival (OS and DSS) rates for all patients were 58 and 80%, respectively. Five patients experienced Grade 3 acute toxicity; two were treated with RRT (2/35), and three were treated with S + ART (3/5, 2 of them with CCT). Two patients experienced Grade 3 late toxicity; one was treated with RRT (1/35, with CCT) and the other was treated with S + ART (1/5). No Grade 4 or higher toxicity was experienced. CONCLUSIONS: RRT for elderly patients with cervical cancer is generally effective and safe, but severe toxicity may occur with more aggressive treatment modalities.