Cargando…

Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints

The DNA damage response pathways involve processes of double-strand break (DSB) repair and cell cycle checkpoint control to prevent or limit entry into S phase or mitosis in the presence of unrepaired damage. Checkpoints can function to permanently remove damaged cells from the actively proliferatin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deckbar, Dorothee, Jeggo, Penny A, Lobrich, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3171706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21524151
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10409238.2011.575764
_version_ 1782211785873424384
author Deckbar, Dorothee
Jeggo, Penny A
Lobrich, Markus
author_facet Deckbar, Dorothee
Jeggo, Penny A
Lobrich, Markus
author_sort Deckbar, Dorothee
collection PubMed
description The DNA damage response pathways involve processes of double-strand break (DSB) repair and cell cycle checkpoint control to prevent or limit entry into S phase or mitosis in the presence of unrepaired damage. Checkpoints can function to permanently remove damaged cells from the actively proliferating population but can also halt the cell cycle temporarily to provide time for the repair of DSBs. Although efficient in their ability to limit genomic instability, checkpoints are not foolproof but carry inherent limitations. Recent work has demonstrated that the G1/S checkpoint is slowly activated and allows cells to enter S phase in the presence of unrepaired DSBs for about 4–6 h post irradiation. During this time, only a slowing but not abolition of S-phase entry is observed. The G2/M checkpoint, in contrast, is quickly activated but only responds to a level of 10–20 DSBs such that cells with a low number of DSBs do not initiate the checkpoint or terminate arrest before repair is complete. Here, we discuss the limitations of these checkpoints in the context of the current knowledge of the factors involved. We suggest that the time needed to fully activate G1/S arrest reflects the existence of a restriction point in G1-phase progression. This point has previously been defined as the point when mitogen starvation fails to prevent cells from entering S phase. However, cells that passed the restriction point can respond to DSBs, albeit with reduced efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3171706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31717062011-09-15 Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints Deckbar, Dorothee Jeggo, Penny A Lobrich, Markus Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol Review Article The DNA damage response pathways involve processes of double-strand break (DSB) repair and cell cycle checkpoint control to prevent or limit entry into S phase or mitosis in the presence of unrepaired damage. Checkpoints can function to permanently remove damaged cells from the actively proliferating population but can also halt the cell cycle temporarily to provide time for the repair of DSBs. Although efficient in their ability to limit genomic instability, checkpoints are not foolproof but carry inherent limitations. Recent work has demonstrated that the G1/S checkpoint is slowly activated and allows cells to enter S phase in the presence of unrepaired DSBs for about 4–6 h post irradiation. During this time, only a slowing but not abolition of S-phase entry is observed. The G2/M checkpoint, in contrast, is quickly activated but only responds to a level of 10–20 DSBs such that cells with a low number of DSBs do not initiate the checkpoint or terminate arrest before repair is complete. Here, we discuss the limitations of these checkpoints in the context of the current knowledge of the factors involved. We suggest that the time needed to fully activate G1/S arrest reflects the existence of a restriction point in G1-phase progression. This point has previously been defined as the point when mitogen starvation fails to prevent cells from entering S phase. However, cells that passed the restriction point can respond to DSBs, albeit with reduced efficiency. Informa Healthcare 2011-08 2011-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3171706/ /pubmed/21524151 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10409238.2011.575764 Text en © 2011 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Informa Healthcare journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Deckbar, Dorothee
Jeggo, Penny A
Lobrich, Markus
Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints
title Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints
title_full Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints
title_fullStr Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints
title_short Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints
title_sort understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3171706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21524151
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10409238.2011.575764
work_keys_str_mv AT deckbardorothee understandingthelimitationsofradiationinducedcellcyclecheckpoints
AT jeggopennya understandingthelimitationsofradiationinducedcellcyclecheckpoints
AT lobrichmarkus understandingthelimitationsofradiationinducedcellcyclecheckpoints