Cargando…
Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints
The DNA damage response pathways involve processes of double-strand break (DSB) repair and cell cycle checkpoint control to prevent or limit entry into S phase or mitosis in the presence of unrepaired damage. Checkpoints can function to permanently remove damaged cells from the actively proliferatin...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3171706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21524151 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10409238.2011.575764 |
_version_ | 1782211785873424384 |
---|---|
author | Deckbar, Dorothee Jeggo, Penny A Lobrich, Markus |
author_facet | Deckbar, Dorothee Jeggo, Penny A Lobrich, Markus |
author_sort | Deckbar, Dorothee |
collection | PubMed |
description | The DNA damage response pathways involve processes of double-strand break (DSB) repair and cell cycle checkpoint control to prevent or limit entry into S phase or mitosis in the presence of unrepaired damage. Checkpoints can function to permanently remove damaged cells from the actively proliferating population but can also halt the cell cycle temporarily to provide time for the repair of DSBs. Although efficient in their ability to limit genomic instability, checkpoints are not foolproof but carry inherent limitations. Recent work has demonstrated that the G1/S checkpoint is slowly activated and allows cells to enter S phase in the presence of unrepaired DSBs for about 4–6 h post irradiation. During this time, only a slowing but not abolition of S-phase entry is observed. The G2/M checkpoint, in contrast, is quickly activated but only responds to a level of 10–20 DSBs such that cells with a low number of DSBs do not initiate the checkpoint or terminate arrest before repair is complete. Here, we discuss the limitations of these checkpoints in the context of the current knowledge of the factors involved. We suggest that the time needed to fully activate G1/S arrest reflects the existence of a restriction point in G1-phase progression. This point has previously been defined as the point when mitogen starvation fails to prevent cells from entering S phase. However, cells that passed the restriction point can respond to DSBs, albeit with reduced efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3171706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31717062011-09-15 Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints Deckbar, Dorothee Jeggo, Penny A Lobrich, Markus Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol Review Article The DNA damage response pathways involve processes of double-strand break (DSB) repair and cell cycle checkpoint control to prevent or limit entry into S phase or mitosis in the presence of unrepaired damage. Checkpoints can function to permanently remove damaged cells from the actively proliferating population but can also halt the cell cycle temporarily to provide time for the repair of DSBs. Although efficient in their ability to limit genomic instability, checkpoints are not foolproof but carry inherent limitations. Recent work has demonstrated that the G1/S checkpoint is slowly activated and allows cells to enter S phase in the presence of unrepaired DSBs for about 4–6 h post irradiation. During this time, only a slowing but not abolition of S-phase entry is observed. The G2/M checkpoint, in contrast, is quickly activated but only responds to a level of 10–20 DSBs such that cells with a low number of DSBs do not initiate the checkpoint or terminate arrest before repair is complete. Here, we discuss the limitations of these checkpoints in the context of the current knowledge of the factors involved. We suggest that the time needed to fully activate G1/S arrest reflects the existence of a restriction point in G1-phase progression. This point has previously been defined as the point when mitogen starvation fails to prevent cells from entering S phase. However, cells that passed the restriction point can respond to DSBs, albeit with reduced efficiency. Informa Healthcare 2011-08 2011-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3171706/ /pubmed/21524151 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10409238.2011.575764 Text en © 2011 Informa Healthcare USA, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Informa Healthcare journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Deckbar, Dorothee Jeggo, Penny A Lobrich, Markus Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints |
title | Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints |
title_full | Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints |
title_fullStr | Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints |
title_short | Understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints |
title_sort | understanding the limitations of radiation-induced cell cycle checkpoints |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3171706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21524151 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10409238.2011.575764 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deckbardorothee understandingthelimitationsofradiationinducedcellcyclecheckpoints AT jeggopennya understandingthelimitationsofradiationinducedcellcyclecheckpoints AT lobrichmarkus understandingthelimitationsofradiationinducedcellcyclecheckpoints |