SAGE is far more sensitive than EST for detecting low-abundance transcripts

BACKGROUND: Isolation of low-abundance transcripts expressed in a genome remains a serious challenge in transcriptome studies. The sensitivity of the methods used for analysis has a direct impact on the efficiency of the detection. We compared the EST method and the SAGE method to determine which on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Miao, Zhou, Guolin, Lee, Sanggyu, Chen, Jianjun, Shi, Run Zhang, Wang, San Ming
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC317289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14704093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-5-1
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Isolation of low-abundance transcripts expressed in a genome remains a serious challenge in transcriptome studies. The sensitivity of the methods used for analysis has a direct impact on the efficiency of the detection. We compared the EST method and the SAGE method to determine which one is more sensitive and to what extent the sensitivity is great for the detection of low-abundance transcripts. RESULTS: Using the same low-abundance transcripts detected by both methods as the targeted sequences, we observed that the SAGE method is 26 times more sensitive than the EST method for the detection of low-abundance transcripts. CONCLUSIONS: The SAGE method is more efficient than the EST method in detecting the low-abundance transcripts.

Ejemplares similares