Cargando…

Use of Observation Care in US Emergency Departments, 2001 to 2008

BACKGROUND: Observation care is a core component of emergency care delivery, yet, the prevalence of emergency department (ED) observation units (OUs) and use of observation care after ED visits is unknown. Our objective was to describe the 1) prevalence of OUs in United States (US) hospitals, 2) cli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Venkatesh, Arjun K., Geisler, Benjamin P., Gibson Chambers, Jennifer J., Baugh, Christopher W., Bohan, J. Stephen, Schuur, Jeremiah D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3173457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21935398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024326
_version_ 1782211963390001152
author Venkatesh, Arjun K.
Geisler, Benjamin P.
Gibson Chambers, Jennifer J.
Baugh, Christopher W.
Bohan, J. Stephen
Schuur, Jeremiah D.
author_facet Venkatesh, Arjun K.
Geisler, Benjamin P.
Gibson Chambers, Jennifer J.
Baugh, Christopher W.
Bohan, J. Stephen
Schuur, Jeremiah D.
author_sort Venkatesh, Arjun K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Observation care is a core component of emergency care delivery, yet, the prevalence of emergency department (ED) observation units (OUs) and use of observation care after ED visits is unknown. Our objective was to describe the 1) prevalence of OUs in United States (US) hospitals, 2) clinical conditions most frequently evaluated with observation, and 3) patient and hospital characteristics associated with use of observation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the proportion of hospitals with dedicated OUs and patient disposition after ED visit (discharge, inpatient admission or observation evaluation) using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) from 2001 to 2008. NHAMCS is an annual, national probability sample of ED visits to US hospitals conducted by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Logistic regression was used to assess hospital-level predictors of OU presence and polytomous logistic regression was used for patient-level predictors of visit disposition, each adjusted for multi-level sampling data. OU analysis was limited to 2007–2008. RESULTS: In 2007–2008, 34.1% of all EDs had a dedicated OU, of which 56.1% were under ED administrative control (EDOU). Between 2001 and 2008, ED visits resulting in a disposition to observation increased from 642,000 (0.60% of ED visits) to 2,318,000 (1.87%, p<.05). Chest pain was the most common reason for ED visit resulting in observation and the most common observation discharge diagnosis (19.1% and 17.1% of observation evaluations, respectively). In hospital-level adjusted analysis, hospital ownership status (non-profit or government), non-teaching status, and longer ED length of visit (>3.6 h) were predictive of OU presence. After patient-level adjustment, EDOU presence was associated with increased disposition to observation (OR 2.19). CONCLUSIONS: One-third of US hospitals have dedicated OUs and observation care is increasingly used for a range of clinical conditions. Further research is warranted to understand the quality, cost and efficiency of observation care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3173457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31734572011-09-20 Use of Observation Care in US Emergency Departments, 2001 to 2008 Venkatesh, Arjun K. Geisler, Benjamin P. Gibson Chambers, Jennifer J. Baugh, Christopher W. Bohan, J. Stephen Schuur, Jeremiah D. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Observation care is a core component of emergency care delivery, yet, the prevalence of emergency department (ED) observation units (OUs) and use of observation care after ED visits is unknown. Our objective was to describe the 1) prevalence of OUs in United States (US) hospitals, 2) clinical conditions most frequently evaluated with observation, and 3) patient and hospital characteristics associated with use of observation. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the proportion of hospitals with dedicated OUs and patient disposition after ED visit (discharge, inpatient admission or observation evaluation) using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) from 2001 to 2008. NHAMCS is an annual, national probability sample of ED visits to US hospitals conducted by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Logistic regression was used to assess hospital-level predictors of OU presence and polytomous logistic regression was used for patient-level predictors of visit disposition, each adjusted for multi-level sampling data. OU analysis was limited to 2007–2008. RESULTS: In 2007–2008, 34.1% of all EDs had a dedicated OU, of which 56.1% were under ED administrative control (EDOU). Between 2001 and 2008, ED visits resulting in a disposition to observation increased from 642,000 (0.60% of ED visits) to 2,318,000 (1.87%, p<.05). Chest pain was the most common reason for ED visit resulting in observation and the most common observation discharge diagnosis (19.1% and 17.1% of observation evaluations, respectively). In hospital-level adjusted analysis, hospital ownership status (non-profit or government), non-teaching status, and longer ED length of visit (>3.6 h) were predictive of OU presence. After patient-level adjustment, EDOU presence was associated with increased disposition to observation (OR 2.19). CONCLUSIONS: One-third of US hospitals have dedicated OUs and observation care is increasingly used for a range of clinical conditions. Further research is warranted to understand the quality, cost and efficiency of observation care. Public Library of Science 2011-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3173457/ /pubmed/21935398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024326 Text en Venkatesh et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Venkatesh, Arjun K.
Geisler, Benjamin P.
Gibson Chambers, Jennifer J.
Baugh, Christopher W.
Bohan, J. Stephen
Schuur, Jeremiah D.
Use of Observation Care in US Emergency Departments, 2001 to 2008
title Use of Observation Care in US Emergency Departments, 2001 to 2008
title_full Use of Observation Care in US Emergency Departments, 2001 to 2008
title_fullStr Use of Observation Care in US Emergency Departments, 2001 to 2008
title_full_unstemmed Use of Observation Care in US Emergency Departments, 2001 to 2008
title_short Use of Observation Care in US Emergency Departments, 2001 to 2008
title_sort use of observation care in us emergency departments, 2001 to 2008
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3173457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21935398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024326
work_keys_str_mv AT venkatesharjunk useofobservationcareinusemergencydepartments2001to2008
AT geislerbenjaminp useofobservationcareinusemergencydepartments2001to2008
AT gibsonchambersjenniferj useofobservationcareinusemergencydepartments2001to2008
AT baughchristopherw useofobservationcareinusemergencydepartments2001to2008
AT bohanjstephen useofobservationcareinusemergencydepartments2001to2008
AT schuurjeremiahd useofobservationcareinusemergencydepartments2001to2008