Cargando…
Science and Society: Some “Made-in-Canada” Options for Improving Integration
In this article, the authors describe relatively recent efforts by scientific research agencies to promote, through various funding programs, the integration of social sciences and humanities with the natural sciences. This “integrated” approach seeks to study science through a broader interdiscipli...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3173746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21574074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2011.575246 |
_version_ | 1782211995051753472 |
---|---|
author | Kosseim, Patricia Chapman, Sheila |
author_facet | Kosseim, Patricia Chapman, Sheila |
author_sort | Kosseim, Patricia |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this article, the authors describe relatively recent efforts by scientific research agencies to promote, through various funding programs, the integration of social sciences and humanities with the natural sciences. This “integrated” approach seeks to study science through a broader interdisciplinary lens in order to better anticipate, understand, and address its ethical, legal, and social implications. The authors review the origins and evolution of this trend, as well the arguments which have been formulated by both proponents and critics of integration. By using Genome Canada's “GE(3)LS” Research Program as a case study, the authors discuss the successes and continuing challenges of this model based on evaluation results available to date. The authors then go on to examine and compare three possible models for improving the future success of the GE(3)LS research program, including: 1) enhancing the current integrated research approach through incremental refinements based on concrete evidence and lessons learned; 2) promoting greater interaction and synergy across GE(3)LS research projects through a deliberate, systematic and coordinated “hub and spoke” approach; and 3) taking a broad programmatic approach to GE(3)LS research by creating a central resource of available expertise and advisory capacity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3173746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31737462011-10-20 Science and Society: Some “Made-in-Canada” Options for Improving Integration Kosseim, Patricia Chapman, Sheila Account Res Research Article In this article, the authors describe relatively recent efforts by scientific research agencies to promote, through various funding programs, the integration of social sciences and humanities with the natural sciences. This “integrated” approach seeks to study science through a broader interdisciplinary lens in order to better anticipate, understand, and address its ethical, legal, and social implications. The authors review the origins and evolution of this trend, as well the arguments which have been formulated by both proponents and critics of integration. By using Genome Canada's “GE(3)LS” Research Program as a case study, the authors discuss the successes and continuing challenges of this model based on evaluation results available to date. The authors then go on to examine and compare three possible models for improving the future success of the GE(3)LS research program, including: 1) enhancing the current integrated research approach through incremental refinements based on concrete evidence and lessons learned; 2) promoting greater interaction and synergy across GE(3)LS research projects through a deliberate, systematic and coordinated “hub and spoke” approach; and 3) taking a broad programmatic approach to GE(3)LS research by creating a central resource of available expertise and advisory capacity. Taylor & Francis 2011-07-05 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3173746/ /pubmed/21574074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2011.575246 Text en Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kosseim, Patricia Chapman, Sheila Science and Society: Some “Made-in-Canada” Options for Improving Integration |
title | Science and Society: Some “Made-in-Canada” Options for Improving Integration |
title_full | Science and Society: Some “Made-in-Canada” Options for Improving Integration |
title_fullStr | Science and Society: Some “Made-in-Canada” Options for Improving Integration |
title_full_unstemmed | Science and Society: Some “Made-in-Canada” Options for Improving Integration |
title_short | Science and Society: Some “Made-in-Canada” Options for Improving Integration |
title_sort | science and society: some “made-in-canada” options for improving integration |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3173746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21574074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2011.575246 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kosseimpatricia scienceandsocietysomemadeincanadaoptionsforimprovingintegration AT chapmansheila scienceandsocietysomemadeincanadaoptionsforimprovingintegration |