Cargando…

Science and Society: Some “Made-in-Canada” Options for Improving Integration

In this article, the authors describe relatively recent efforts by scientific research agencies to promote, through various funding programs, the integration of social sciences and humanities with the natural sciences. This “integrated” approach seeks to study science through a broader interdiscipli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kosseim, Patricia, Chapman, Sheila
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3173746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21574074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2011.575246
_version_ 1782211995051753472
author Kosseim, Patricia
Chapman, Sheila
author_facet Kosseim, Patricia
Chapman, Sheila
author_sort Kosseim, Patricia
collection PubMed
description In this article, the authors describe relatively recent efforts by scientific research agencies to promote, through various funding programs, the integration of social sciences and humanities with the natural sciences. This “integrated” approach seeks to study science through a broader interdisciplinary lens in order to better anticipate, understand, and address its ethical, legal, and social implications. The authors review the origins and evolution of this trend, as well the arguments which have been formulated by both proponents and critics of integration. By using Genome Canada's “GE(3)LS” Research Program as a case study, the authors discuss the successes and continuing challenges of this model based on evaluation results available to date. The authors then go on to examine and compare three possible models for improving the future success of the GE(3)LS research program, including: 1) enhancing the current integrated research approach through incremental refinements based on concrete evidence and lessons learned; 2) promoting greater interaction and synergy across GE(3)LS research projects through a deliberate, systematic and coordinated “hub and spoke” approach; and 3) taking a broad programmatic approach to GE(3)LS research by creating a central resource of available expertise and advisory capacity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3173746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31737462011-10-20 Science and Society: Some “Made-in-Canada” Options for Improving Integration Kosseim, Patricia Chapman, Sheila Account Res Research Article In this article, the authors describe relatively recent efforts by scientific research agencies to promote, through various funding programs, the integration of social sciences and humanities with the natural sciences. This “integrated” approach seeks to study science through a broader interdisciplinary lens in order to better anticipate, understand, and address its ethical, legal, and social implications. The authors review the origins and evolution of this trend, as well the arguments which have been formulated by both proponents and critics of integration. By using Genome Canada's “GE(3)LS” Research Program as a case study, the authors discuss the successes and continuing challenges of this model based on evaluation results available to date. The authors then go on to examine and compare three possible models for improving the future success of the GE(3)LS research program, including: 1) enhancing the current integrated research approach through incremental refinements based on concrete evidence and lessons learned; 2) promoting greater interaction and synergy across GE(3)LS research projects through a deliberate, systematic and coordinated “hub and spoke” approach; and 3) taking a broad programmatic approach to GE(3)LS research by creating a central resource of available expertise and advisory capacity. Taylor & Francis 2011-07-05 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3173746/ /pubmed/21574074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2011.575246 Text en Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kosseim, Patricia
Chapman, Sheila
Science and Society: Some “Made-in-Canada” Options for Improving Integration
title Science and Society: Some “Made-in-Canada” Options for Improving Integration
title_full Science and Society: Some “Made-in-Canada” Options for Improving Integration
title_fullStr Science and Society: Some “Made-in-Canada” Options for Improving Integration
title_full_unstemmed Science and Society: Some “Made-in-Canada” Options for Improving Integration
title_short Science and Society: Some “Made-in-Canada” Options for Improving Integration
title_sort science and society: some “made-in-canada” options for improving integration
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3173746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21574074
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2011.575246
work_keys_str_mv AT kosseimpatricia scienceandsocietysomemadeincanadaoptionsforimprovingintegration
AT chapmansheila scienceandsocietysomemadeincanadaoptionsforimprovingintegration