Cargando…

Post-Error Adjustments

When our brain detects an error, this process changes how we react on ensuing trials. People show post-error adaptations, potentially to improve their performance in the near future. At least three types of behavioral post-error adjustments have been observed. These are post-error slowing (PES), pos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Danielmeier, Claudia, Ullsperger, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3173829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21954390
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00233
_version_ 1782212000223330304
author Danielmeier, Claudia
Ullsperger, Markus
author_facet Danielmeier, Claudia
Ullsperger, Markus
author_sort Danielmeier, Claudia
collection PubMed
description When our brain detects an error, this process changes how we react on ensuing trials. People show post-error adaptations, potentially to improve their performance in the near future. At least three types of behavioral post-error adjustments have been observed. These are post-error slowing (PES), post-error reduction of interference, and post-error improvement in accuracy (PIA). Apart from these behavioral changes, post-error adaptations have also been observed on a neuronal level with functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography. Neuronal post-error adaptations comprise activity increase in task-relevant brain areas, activity decrease in distracter-encoding brain areas, activity modulations in the motor system, and mid-frontal theta power increases. Here, we review the current literature with respect to these post-error adjustments, discuss under which circumstances these adjustments can be observed, and whether the different types of adjustments are linked to each other. We also evaluate different approaches for explaining the functional role of PES. In addition, we report reanalyzed and follow-up data from a flanker task and a moving dots interference task showing (1) that PES and PIA are not necessarily correlated, (2) that PES depends on the response–stimulus interval, and (3) that PES is reliable on a within-subject level over periods as long as several months.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3173829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31738292011-09-27 Post-Error Adjustments Danielmeier, Claudia Ullsperger, Markus Front Psychol Psychology When our brain detects an error, this process changes how we react on ensuing trials. People show post-error adaptations, potentially to improve their performance in the near future. At least three types of behavioral post-error adjustments have been observed. These are post-error slowing (PES), post-error reduction of interference, and post-error improvement in accuracy (PIA). Apart from these behavioral changes, post-error adaptations have also been observed on a neuronal level with functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography. Neuronal post-error adaptations comprise activity increase in task-relevant brain areas, activity decrease in distracter-encoding brain areas, activity modulations in the motor system, and mid-frontal theta power increases. Here, we review the current literature with respect to these post-error adjustments, discuss under which circumstances these adjustments can be observed, and whether the different types of adjustments are linked to each other. We also evaluate different approaches for explaining the functional role of PES. In addition, we report reanalyzed and follow-up data from a flanker task and a moving dots interference task showing (1) that PES and PIA are not necessarily correlated, (2) that PES depends on the response–stimulus interval, and (3) that PES is reliable on a within-subject level over periods as long as several months. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3173829/ /pubmed/21954390 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00233 Text en Copyright © 2011 Danielmeier and Ullsperger. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.
spellingShingle Psychology
Danielmeier, Claudia
Ullsperger, Markus
Post-Error Adjustments
title Post-Error Adjustments
title_full Post-Error Adjustments
title_fullStr Post-Error Adjustments
title_full_unstemmed Post-Error Adjustments
title_short Post-Error Adjustments
title_sort post-error adjustments
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3173829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21954390
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00233
work_keys_str_mv AT danielmeierclaudia posterroradjustments
AT ullspergermarkus posterroradjustments