Cargando…

Discrimination of Timbre in Early Auditory Responses of the Human Brain

BACKGROUND: The issue of how differences in timbre are represented in the neural response still has not been well addressed, particularly with regard to the relevant brain mechanisms. Here we employ phasing and clipping of tones to produce auditory stimuli differing to describe the multidimensional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seol, Jaeho, Oh, MiAe, Kim, June Sic, Jin, Seung-Hyun, Kim, Sun Il, Chung, Chun Kee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3174256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21949807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024959
_version_ 1782212058385743872
author Seol, Jaeho
Oh, MiAe
Kim, June Sic
Jin, Seung-Hyun
Kim, Sun Il
Chung, Chun Kee
author_facet Seol, Jaeho
Oh, MiAe
Kim, June Sic
Jin, Seung-Hyun
Kim, Sun Il
Chung, Chun Kee
author_sort Seol, Jaeho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The issue of how differences in timbre are represented in the neural response still has not been well addressed, particularly with regard to the relevant brain mechanisms. Here we employ phasing and clipping of tones to produce auditory stimuli differing to describe the multidimensional nature of timbre. We investigated the auditory response and sensory gating as well, using by magnetoencephalography (MEG). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Thirty-five healthy subjects without hearing deficit participated in the experiments. Two different or same tones in timbre were presented through conditioning (S1) – testing (S2) paradigm as a pair with an interval of 500 ms. As a result, the magnitudes of auditory M50 and M100 responses were different with timbre in both hemispheres. This result might support that timbre, at least by phasing and clipping, is discriminated in the auditory early processing. The second response in a pair affected by S1 in the consecutive stimuli occurred in M100 of the left hemisphere, whereas both M50 and M100 responses to S2 only in the right hemisphere reflected whether two stimuli in a pair were the same or not. Both M50 and M100 magnitudes were different with the presenting order (S1 vs. S2) for both same and different conditions in the both hemispheres. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCES: Our results demonstrate that the auditory response depends on timbre characteristics. Moreover, it was revealed that the auditory sensory gating is determined not by the stimulus that directly evokes the response, but rather by whether or not the two stimuli are identical in timbre.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3174256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31742562011-09-26 Discrimination of Timbre in Early Auditory Responses of the Human Brain Seol, Jaeho Oh, MiAe Kim, June Sic Jin, Seung-Hyun Kim, Sun Il Chung, Chun Kee PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The issue of how differences in timbre are represented in the neural response still has not been well addressed, particularly with regard to the relevant brain mechanisms. Here we employ phasing and clipping of tones to produce auditory stimuli differing to describe the multidimensional nature of timbre. We investigated the auditory response and sensory gating as well, using by magnetoencephalography (MEG). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Thirty-five healthy subjects without hearing deficit participated in the experiments. Two different or same tones in timbre were presented through conditioning (S1) – testing (S2) paradigm as a pair with an interval of 500 ms. As a result, the magnitudes of auditory M50 and M100 responses were different with timbre in both hemispheres. This result might support that timbre, at least by phasing and clipping, is discriminated in the auditory early processing. The second response in a pair affected by S1 in the consecutive stimuli occurred in M100 of the left hemisphere, whereas both M50 and M100 responses to S2 only in the right hemisphere reflected whether two stimuli in a pair were the same or not. Both M50 and M100 magnitudes were different with the presenting order (S1 vs. S2) for both same and different conditions in the both hemispheres. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCES: Our results demonstrate that the auditory response depends on timbre characteristics. Moreover, it was revealed that the auditory sensory gating is determined not by the stimulus that directly evokes the response, but rather by whether or not the two stimuli are identical in timbre. Public Library of Science 2011-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3174256/ /pubmed/21949807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024959 Text en Seol et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Seol, Jaeho
Oh, MiAe
Kim, June Sic
Jin, Seung-Hyun
Kim, Sun Il
Chung, Chun Kee
Discrimination of Timbre in Early Auditory Responses of the Human Brain
title Discrimination of Timbre in Early Auditory Responses of the Human Brain
title_full Discrimination of Timbre in Early Auditory Responses of the Human Brain
title_fullStr Discrimination of Timbre in Early Auditory Responses of the Human Brain
title_full_unstemmed Discrimination of Timbre in Early Auditory Responses of the Human Brain
title_short Discrimination of Timbre in Early Auditory Responses of the Human Brain
title_sort discrimination of timbre in early auditory responses of the human brain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3174256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21949807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024959
work_keys_str_mv AT seoljaeho discriminationoftimbreinearlyauditoryresponsesofthehumanbrain
AT ohmiae discriminationoftimbreinearlyauditoryresponsesofthehumanbrain
AT kimjunesic discriminationoftimbreinearlyauditoryresponsesofthehumanbrain
AT jinseunghyun discriminationoftimbreinearlyauditoryresponsesofthehumanbrain
AT kimsunil discriminationoftimbreinearlyauditoryresponsesofthehumanbrain
AT chungchunkee discriminationoftimbreinearlyauditoryresponsesofthehumanbrain