Cargando…
The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals
In order to study the prevalence, nature (direction), and causes of reporting errors in psychology, we checked the consistency of reported test statistics, degrees of freedom, and p values in a random sample of high- and low-impact psychology journals. In a second study, we established the generalit...
Autores principales: | Bakker, Marjan, Wicherts, Jelte M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3174372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21494917 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0089-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Willingness to Share Research Data Is Related to the Strength of the Evidence and the Quality of Reporting of Statistical Results
por: Wicherts, Jelte M., et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Outlier Removal and the Relation with Reporting Errors and Quality of Psychological Research
por: Bakker, Marjan, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Statistical Reporting Errors and Collaboration on Statistical Analyses in Psychological Science
por: Veldkamp, Coosje L. S., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
How do psychology researchers interpret the results of multiple replication studies?
por: van den Akker, Olmo R., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals
por: Wicherts, Jelte M.
Publicado: (2016)