Cargando…

Identification of ambiguities in the 1994 chronic fatigue syndrome research case definition and recommendations for resolution

BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is defined by symptoms and disability, has no confirmatory physical signs or characteristic laboratory abnormalities, and the etiology and pathophysiology remain unknown. Difficulties with accurate case ascertainment contribute to this ignorance. METHODS: E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reeves, William C, Lloyd, Andrew, Vernon, Suzanne D, Klimas, Nancy, Jason, Leonard A, Bleijenberg, Gijs, Evengard, Birgitta, White, Peter D, Nisenbaum, Rosane, Unger, Elizabeth R
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC317472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14702202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-3-25
_version_ 1782121160082718720
author Reeves, William C
Lloyd, Andrew
Vernon, Suzanne D
Klimas, Nancy
Jason, Leonard A
Bleijenberg, Gijs
Evengard, Birgitta
White, Peter D
Nisenbaum, Rosane
Unger, Elizabeth R
author_facet Reeves, William C
Lloyd, Andrew
Vernon, Suzanne D
Klimas, Nancy
Jason, Leonard A
Bleijenberg, Gijs
Evengard, Birgitta
White, Peter D
Nisenbaum, Rosane
Unger, Elizabeth R
author_sort Reeves, William C
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is defined by symptoms and disability, has no confirmatory physical signs or characteristic laboratory abnormalities, and the etiology and pathophysiology remain unknown. Difficulties with accurate case ascertainment contribute to this ignorance. METHODS: Experienced investigators from around the world who are involved in CFS research met for a series of three day workshops in 2000, 2001 and 2002 intended to identify the problems in application of the current CFS case definition. The investigators were divided into focus groups and each group was charged with a topic. The investigators in each focus group relied on their own clinical and scientific knowledge, brainstorming within each group and with all investigators when focus group summaries were presented. Relevant literature was selected and reviewed independent of the workshops. The relevant literature was circulated via list-serves and resolved as being relevant by group consensus. Focus group reports were analyzed and compiled into the recommendations presented here. RESULTS: Ambiguities in the current CFS research definition that contribute to inconsistent case identification were identified. Recommendations for use of the definition, standardization of classification instruments and study design issues are presented that are intended to improve the precision of case ascertainment. The International CFS Study Group also identified ambiguities associated with exclusionary and comorbid conditions and reviewed the standardized, internationally applicable instruments used to measure symptoms, fatigue intensity and associated disability. CONCLUSION: This paper provides an approach to guide systematic, and hopefully reproducible, application of the current case definition, so that case ascertainment would be more uniform across sites. Ultimately, an operational CFS case definition will need to be based on empirical studies designed to delineate the possibly distinct biological pathways that result in chronic fatigue.
format Text
id pubmed-317472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-3174722004-01-24 Identification of ambiguities in the 1994 chronic fatigue syndrome research case definition and recommendations for resolution Reeves, William C Lloyd, Andrew Vernon, Suzanne D Klimas, Nancy Jason, Leonard A Bleijenberg, Gijs Evengard, Birgitta White, Peter D Nisenbaum, Rosane Unger, Elizabeth R BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is defined by symptoms and disability, has no confirmatory physical signs or characteristic laboratory abnormalities, and the etiology and pathophysiology remain unknown. Difficulties with accurate case ascertainment contribute to this ignorance. METHODS: Experienced investigators from around the world who are involved in CFS research met for a series of three day workshops in 2000, 2001 and 2002 intended to identify the problems in application of the current CFS case definition. The investigators were divided into focus groups and each group was charged with a topic. The investigators in each focus group relied on their own clinical and scientific knowledge, brainstorming within each group and with all investigators when focus group summaries were presented. Relevant literature was selected and reviewed independent of the workshops. The relevant literature was circulated via list-serves and resolved as being relevant by group consensus. Focus group reports were analyzed and compiled into the recommendations presented here. RESULTS: Ambiguities in the current CFS research definition that contribute to inconsistent case identification were identified. Recommendations for use of the definition, standardization of classification instruments and study design issues are presented that are intended to improve the precision of case ascertainment. The International CFS Study Group also identified ambiguities associated with exclusionary and comorbid conditions and reviewed the standardized, internationally applicable instruments used to measure symptoms, fatigue intensity and associated disability. CONCLUSION: This paper provides an approach to guide systematic, and hopefully reproducible, application of the current case definition, so that case ascertainment would be more uniform across sites. Ultimately, an operational CFS case definition will need to be based on empirical studies designed to delineate the possibly distinct biological pathways that result in chronic fatigue. BioMed Central 2003-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC317472/ /pubmed/14702202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-3-25 Text en Copyright © 2003 Reeves et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Reeves, William C
Lloyd, Andrew
Vernon, Suzanne D
Klimas, Nancy
Jason, Leonard A
Bleijenberg, Gijs
Evengard, Birgitta
White, Peter D
Nisenbaum, Rosane
Unger, Elizabeth R
Identification of ambiguities in the 1994 chronic fatigue syndrome research case definition and recommendations for resolution
title Identification of ambiguities in the 1994 chronic fatigue syndrome research case definition and recommendations for resolution
title_full Identification of ambiguities in the 1994 chronic fatigue syndrome research case definition and recommendations for resolution
title_fullStr Identification of ambiguities in the 1994 chronic fatigue syndrome research case definition and recommendations for resolution
title_full_unstemmed Identification of ambiguities in the 1994 chronic fatigue syndrome research case definition and recommendations for resolution
title_short Identification of ambiguities in the 1994 chronic fatigue syndrome research case definition and recommendations for resolution
title_sort identification of ambiguities in the 1994 chronic fatigue syndrome research case definition and recommendations for resolution
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC317472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14702202
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-3-25
work_keys_str_mv AT reeveswilliamc identificationofambiguitiesinthe1994chronicfatiguesyndromeresearchcasedefinitionandrecommendationsforresolution
AT lloydandrew identificationofambiguitiesinthe1994chronicfatiguesyndromeresearchcasedefinitionandrecommendationsforresolution
AT vernonsuzanned identificationofambiguitiesinthe1994chronicfatiguesyndromeresearchcasedefinitionandrecommendationsforresolution
AT klimasnancy identificationofambiguitiesinthe1994chronicfatiguesyndromeresearchcasedefinitionandrecommendationsforresolution
AT jasonleonarda identificationofambiguitiesinthe1994chronicfatiguesyndromeresearchcasedefinitionandrecommendationsforresolution
AT bleijenberggijs identificationofambiguitiesinthe1994chronicfatiguesyndromeresearchcasedefinitionandrecommendationsforresolution
AT evengardbirgitta identificationofambiguitiesinthe1994chronicfatiguesyndromeresearchcasedefinitionandrecommendationsforresolution
AT whitepeterd identificationofambiguitiesinthe1994chronicfatiguesyndromeresearchcasedefinitionandrecommendationsforresolution
AT nisenbaumrosane identificationofambiguitiesinthe1994chronicfatiguesyndromeresearchcasedefinitionandrecommendationsforresolution
AT ungerelizabethr identificationofambiguitiesinthe1994chronicfatiguesyndromeresearchcasedefinitionandrecommendationsforresolution
AT identificationofambiguitiesinthe1994chronicfatiguesyndromeresearchcasedefinitionandrecommendationsforresolution