Cargando…
Shock Wave Treatment in Composite Tissue Allotransplantation
Introduction: Composite tissue allotransplantation is a newly emerged field of transplantation. Shock wave technology has already been used in the treatment of urologic and orthopedic disorders. Recent studies demonstrated a suppression of the early proinflammatory immune response. Methods: 50 allog...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Open Science Company, LLC
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3174861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22028945 |
_version_ | 1782212084268793856 |
---|---|
author | Radu, Christian Andreas Kiefer, Jurij Horn, Dominik Rebel, Martin Koellensperger, Eva Gebhard, Martha Maria Ryssel, Henning Germann, Guenter Reichenberger, Matthias Artur |
author_facet | Radu, Christian Andreas Kiefer, Jurij Horn, Dominik Rebel, Martin Koellensperger, Eva Gebhard, Martha Maria Ryssel, Henning Germann, Guenter Reichenberger, Matthias Artur |
author_sort | Radu, Christian Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Composite tissue allotransplantation is a newly emerged field of transplantation. Shock wave technology has already been used in the treatment of urologic and orthopedic disorders. Recent studies demonstrated a suppression of the early proinflammatory immune response. Methods: 50 allogeneic hindlimb transplantations were performed on rats in 5 different groups. Group A (n = 10), (Lewis → Brown-Norway) received 500 impulses of extracorporeal shock wave. Groups B, C, D, and E served as control groups with group B (n = 10) receiving no immunosuppression, group C (n = 10) receiving FK506 and prednisolone, group D (n = 10) receiving no immunosuppression with isograft transplantations (Brown-Norway → Brown-Norway) and group E receiving 500 impulses of extracorporeal shock wave on the contralateral hindlimb. Results: Rejection of the allogeneic hindlimb occurred on average 7.12 days after transplantation in group A (extracorporeal shock wave). Rejection was significantly delayed compared to the control groups B (no immunosuppression) and E (contralateral hindlimb), where rejection of the allogeneic hindlimb occurred on average 5.49 and 5.6 days after transplantation (t test, P < .01). No rejection was seen in groups C and D. Conclusions: For the first time, shock waves have been applied in a composite tissue allotransplantation model and resulted in a significant immunosuppressive effect. These promising first results have showed that shock wave treatment is clinically relevant in composite tissue allotransplantation and justify subsequent research to improve the experimental and clinical outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3174861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Open Science Company, LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31748612011-10-25 Shock Wave Treatment in Composite Tissue Allotransplantation Radu, Christian Andreas Kiefer, Jurij Horn, Dominik Rebel, Martin Koellensperger, Eva Gebhard, Martha Maria Ryssel, Henning Germann, Guenter Reichenberger, Matthias Artur Eplasty Journal Article Introduction: Composite tissue allotransplantation is a newly emerged field of transplantation. Shock wave technology has already been used in the treatment of urologic and orthopedic disorders. Recent studies demonstrated a suppression of the early proinflammatory immune response. Methods: 50 allogeneic hindlimb transplantations were performed on rats in 5 different groups. Group A (n = 10), (Lewis → Brown-Norway) received 500 impulses of extracorporeal shock wave. Groups B, C, D, and E served as control groups with group B (n = 10) receiving no immunosuppression, group C (n = 10) receiving FK506 and prednisolone, group D (n = 10) receiving no immunosuppression with isograft transplantations (Brown-Norway → Brown-Norway) and group E receiving 500 impulses of extracorporeal shock wave on the contralateral hindlimb. Results: Rejection of the allogeneic hindlimb occurred on average 7.12 days after transplantation in group A (extracorporeal shock wave). Rejection was significantly delayed compared to the control groups B (no immunosuppression) and E (contralateral hindlimb), where rejection of the allogeneic hindlimb occurred on average 5.49 and 5.6 days after transplantation (t test, P < .01). No rejection was seen in groups C and D. Conclusions: For the first time, shock waves have been applied in a composite tissue allotransplantation model and resulted in a significant immunosuppressive effect. These promising first results have showed that shock wave treatment is clinically relevant in composite tissue allotransplantation and justify subsequent research to improve the experimental and clinical outcome. Open Science Company, LLC 2011-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3174861/ /pubmed/22028945 Text en Copyright © 2011 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Journal Article Radu, Christian Andreas Kiefer, Jurij Horn, Dominik Rebel, Martin Koellensperger, Eva Gebhard, Martha Maria Ryssel, Henning Germann, Guenter Reichenberger, Matthias Artur Shock Wave Treatment in Composite Tissue Allotransplantation |
title | Shock Wave Treatment in Composite Tissue Allotransplantation |
title_full | Shock Wave Treatment in Composite Tissue Allotransplantation |
title_fullStr | Shock Wave Treatment in Composite Tissue Allotransplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Shock Wave Treatment in Composite Tissue Allotransplantation |
title_short | Shock Wave Treatment in Composite Tissue Allotransplantation |
title_sort | shock wave treatment in composite tissue allotransplantation |
topic | Journal Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3174861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22028945 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raduchristianandreas shockwavetreatmentincompositetissueallotransplantation AT kieferjurij shockwavetreatmentincompositetissueallotransplantation AT horndominik shockwavetreatmentincompositetissueallotransplantation AT rebelmartin shockwavetreatmentincompositetissueallotransplantation AT koellenspergereva shockwavetreatmentincompositetissueallotransplantation AT gebhardmarthamaria shockwavetreatmentincompositetissueallotransplantation AT rysselhenning shockwavetreatmentincompositetissueallotransplantation AT germannguenter shockwavetreatmentincompositetissueallotransplantation AT reichenbergermatthiasartur shockwavetreatmentincompositetissueallotransplantation |