Cargando…

Displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle: non-operative treatment versus plate fixation (Sleutel-TRIAL). A multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The traditional view that the vast majority of midshaft clavicular fractures heal with good functional outcomes following non-operative treatment may be no longer valid for all midshaft clavicular fractures. Recent studies have presented a relatively high incidence of non-union and ident...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stegeman, Sylvia A, de Jong, Mireille, Sier, Cornelis FM, Krijnen, Pieta, Duijff, Jan W, van Thiel, Tom PH, de Rijcke, Piet AR, Soesman, Nicolaj MR, Hagenaars, Tjebbe, Boekhoudt, Freek D, de Vries, Mark R, Roukema, Gert R, Tanka, Andras FK, van den Bremer, Jephta, van der Meulen, Hub GWM, Bronkhorst, Maarten WGA, van Dijkman, Bart A, van Zutphen, Stephan WAM, Vos, Dagmar I, Schep, Niels WL, Eversdijk, Martin G, van Olden, Ger DJ, van den Brand, Johan GH, Hillen, Robert Jan, Frölke, Jan Paul M, Schipper, Inger B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3175212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21864352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-196
_version_ 1782212132504338432
author Stegeman, Sylvia A
de Jong, Mireille
Sier, Cornelis FM
Krijnen, Pieta
Duijff, Jan W
van Thiel, Tom PH
de Rijcke, Piet AR
Soesman, Nicolaj MR
Hagenaars, Tjebbe
Boekhoudt, Freek D
de Vries, Mark R
Roukema, Gert R
Tanka, Andras FK
van den Bremer, Jephta
van der Meulen, Hub GWM
Bronkhorst, Maarten WGA
van Dijkman, Bart A
van Zutphen, Stephan WAM
Vos, Dagmar I
Schep, Niels WL
Eversdijk, Martin G
van Olden, Ger DJ
van den Brand, Johan GH
Hillen, Robert Jan
Frölke, Jan Paul M
Schipper, Inger B
author_facet Stegeman, Sylvia A
de Jong, Mireille
Sier, Cornelis FM
Krijnen, Pieta
Duijff, Jan W
van Thiel, Tom PH
de Rijcke, Piet AR
Soesman, Nicolaj MR
Hagenaars, Tjebbe
Boekhoudt, Freek D
de Vries, Mark R
Roukema, Gert R
Tanka, Andras FK
van den Bremer, Jephta
van der Meulen, Hub GWM
Bronkhorst, Maarten WGA
van Dijkman, Bart A
van Zutphen, Stephan WAM
Vos, Dagmar I
Schep, Niels WL
Eversdijk, Martin G
van Olden, Ger DJ
van den Brand, Johan GH
Hillen, Robert Jan
Frölke, Jan Paul M
Schipper, Inger B
author_sort Stegeman, Sylvia A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The traditional view that the vast majority of midshaft clavicular fractures heal with good functional outcomes following non-operative treatment may be no longer valid for all midshaft clavicular fractures. Recent studies have presented a relatively high incidence of non-union and identified speciic limitations of the shoulder function in subgroups of patients with these injuries. AIM: A prospective, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted in 21 hospitals in the Netherlands, comparing fracture consolidation and shoulder function after either non-operative treatment with a sling or a plate fixation. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 350 patients will be included, between 18 and 60 years of age, with a dislocated midshaft clavicular fracture. The primary outcome is the incidence of non-union, which will be determined with standardised X-rays (Antero-Posterior and 30 degrees caudocephalad view). Secondary outcome will be the functional outcome, measured using the Constant Score. Strength of the shoulder muscles will be measured with a handheld dynamometer (MicroFET2). Furthermore, the health-related Quality of Life score (ShortForm-36) and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Measure will be monitored as subjective parameters. Data on complications, bone union, cosmetic aspects and use of painkillers will be collected with follow-up questionnaires. The follow-up time will be two years. All patients will be monitored at regular intervals over the subsequent twelve months (two and six weeks, three months and one year). After two years an interview by telephone and a written survey will be performed to evaluate the two-year functional and mechanical outcomes. All data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis, using univariate and multivariate analyses. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide level-1 evidence for the comparison of consolidation and functional outcome between two standardised treatment options for dislocated midshaft clavicular fractures. The gathered data may support the development of a clinical guideline for treatment of clavicular fractures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands National Trial Register NTR2399
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3175212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31752122011-09-18 Displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle: non-operative treatment versus plate fixation (Sleutel-TRIAL). A multicentre randomised controlled trial Stegeman, Sylvia A de Jong, Mireille Sier, Cornelis FM Krijnen, Pieta Duijff, Jan W van Thiel, Tom PH de Rijcke, Piet AR Soesman, Nicolaj MR Hagenaars, Tjebbe Boekhoudt, Freek D de Vries, Mark R Roukema, Gert R Tanka, Andras FK van den Bremer, Jephta van der Meulen, Hub GWM Bronkhorst, Maarten WGA van Dijkman, Bart A van Zutphen, Stephan WAM Vos, Dagmar I Schep, Niels WL Eversdijk, Martin G van Olden, Ger DJ van den Brand, Johan GH Hillen, Robert Jan Frölke, Jan Paul M Schipper, Inger B BMC Musculoskelet Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The traditional view that the vast majority of midshaft clavicular fractures heal with good functional outcomes following non-operative treatment may be no longer valid for all midshaft clavicular fractures. Recent studies have presented a relatively high incidence of non-union and identified speciic limitations of the shoulder function in subgroups of patients with these injuries. AIM: A prospective, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted in 21 hospitals in the Netherlands, comparing fracture consolidation and shoulder function after either non-operative treatment with a sling or a plate fixation. METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 350 patients will be included, between 18 and 60 years of age, with a dislocated midshaft clavicular fracture. The primary outcome is the incidence of non-union, which will be determined with standardised X-rays (Antero-Posterior and 30 degrees caudocephalad view). Secondary outcome will be the functional outcome, measured using the Constant Score. Strength of the shoulder muscles will be measured with a handheld dynamometer (MicroFET2). Furthermore, the health-related Quality of Life score (ShortForm-36) and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Measure will be monitored as subjective parameters. Data on complications, bone union, cosmetic aspects and use of painkillers will be collected with follow-up questionnaires. The follow-up time will be two years. All patients will be monitored at regular intervals over the subsequent twelve months (two and six weeks, three months and one year). After two years an interview by telephone and a written survey will be performed to evaluate the two-year functional and mechanical outcomes. All data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis, using univariate and multivariate analyses. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide level-1 evidence for the comparison of consolidation and functional outcome between two standardised treatment options for dislocated midshaft clavicular fractures. The gathered data may support the development of a clinical guideline for treatment of clavicular fractures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands National Trial Register NTR2399 BioMed Central 2011-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3175212/ /pubmed/21864352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-196 Text en Copyright ©2011 Stegeman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Stegeman, Sylvia A
de Jong, Mireille
Sier, Cornelis FM
Krijnen, Pieta
Duijff, Jan W
van Thiel, Tom PH
de Rijcke, Piet AR
Soesman, Nicolaj MR
Hagenaars, Tjebbe
Boekhoudt, Freek D
de Vries, Mark R
Roukema, Gert R
Tanka, Andras FK
van den Bremer, Jephta
van der Meulen, Hub GWM
Bronkhorst, Maarten WGA
van Dijkman, Bart A
van Zutphen, Stephan WAM
Vos, Dagmar I
Schep, Niels WL
Eversdijk, Martin G
van Olden, Ger DJ
van den Brand, Johan GH
Hillen, Robert Jan
Frölke, Jan Paul M
Schipper, Inger B
Displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle: non-operative treatment versus plate fixation (Sleutel-TRIAL). A multicentre randomised controlled trial
title Displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle: non-operative treatment versus plate fixation (Sleutel-TRIAL). A multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full Displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle: non-operative treatment versus plate fixation (Sleutel-TRIAL). A multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle: non-operative treatment versus plate fixation (Sleutel-TRIAL). A multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle: non-operative treatment versus plate fixation (Sleutel-TRIAL). A multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_short Displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle: non-operative treatment versus plate fixation (Sleutel-TRIAL). A multicentre randomised controlled trial
title_sort displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle: non-operative treatment versus plate fixation (sleutel-trial). a multicentre randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3175212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21864352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-196
work_keys_str_mv AT stegemansylviaa displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dejongmireille displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT siercornelisfm displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT krijnenpieta displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT duijffjanw displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanthieltomph displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT derijckepietar displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT soesmannicolajmr displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hagenaarstjebbe displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT boekhoudtfreekd displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT devriesmarkr displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT roukemagertr displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tankaandrasfk displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandenbremerjephta displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandermeulenhubgwm displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bronkhorstmaartenwga displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandijkmanbarta displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanzutphenstephanwam displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vosdagmari displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schepnielswl displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT eversdijkmarting displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanoldengerdj displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandenbrandjohangh displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hillenrobertjan displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT frolkejanpaulm displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schipperingerb displacedmidshaftfracturesoftheclaviclenonoperativetreatmentversusplatefixationsleuteltrialamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial