Cargando…

Differential strengths of selection on S-RNases from Physalis and Solanum (Solanaceae)

BACKGROUND: The S-RNases of the Solanaceae are highly polymorphic self-incompatibility (S-) alleles subject to strong balancing selection. Relatively recent diversification of S-alleles has occurred in the genus Physalis following a historical restriction of S-allele diversity. In contrast, the genu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paape, Timothy, Kohn, Joshua R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3175474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21854581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-243
_version_ 1782212159945572352
author Paape, Timothy
Kohn, Joshua R
author_facet Paape, Timothy
Kohn, Joshua R
author_sort Paape, Timothy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The S-RNases of the Solanaceae are highly polymorphic self-incompatibility (S-) alleles subject to strong balancing selection. Relatively recent diversification of S-alleles has occurred in the genus Physalis following a historical restriction of S-allele diversity. In contrast, the genus Solanum did not undergo a restriction of S-locus diversity and its S-alleles are generally much older. Because recovery from reduced S-locus diversity should involve increased selection, we employ a statistical framework to ask whether S-locus selection intensities are higher in Physalis than Solanum. Because different S-RNase lineages diversify in Physalis and Solanum, we also ask whether different sites are under selection in different lineages. RESULTS: Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian coalescent methods found higher intensities of selection and more sites under significant positive selection in the 48 Physalis S-RNase alleles than the 49 from Solanum. Highest posterior densities of dN/dS (ω) estimates show that the strength of selection is greater for Physalis at 36 codons. A nested maximum likelihood method was more conservative, but still found 16 sites with greater selection in Physalis. Neither method found any codons under significantly greater selection in Solanum. A random effects likelihood method that examines data from both taxa jointly confirmed higher selection intensities in Physalis, but did not find different proportions of sites under selection in the two datasets. The greatest differences in strengths of selection were found in the most variable regions of the S-RNases, as expected if these regions encode self-recognition specificities. Clade-specific likelihood models indicated some codons were under greater selection in background Solanum lineages than in specific lineages of Physalis implying that selection on sites may differ among lineages. CONCLUSIONS: Likelihood and Bayesian methods provide a statistical approach to testing differential selection across populations or species. These tests appear robust to the levels of polymorphism found in diverse S-allele collections subject to strong balancing selection. As predicted, the intensity of selection at the S-locus was higher in the taxon with more recent S-locus diversification. This is the first confirmation by statistical test of differing selection intensities among self-incompatibility alleles from different populations or species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3175474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31754742011-09-19 Differential strengths of selection on S-RNases from Physalis and Solanum (Solanaceae) Paape, Timothy Kohn, Joshua R BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The S-RNases of the Solanaceae are highly polymorphic self-incompatibility (S-) alleles subject to strong balancing selection. Relatively recent diversification of S-alleles has occurred in the genus Physalis following a historical restriction of S-allele diversity. In contrast, the genus Solanum did not undergo a restriction of S-locus diversity and its S-alleles are generally much older. Because recovery from reduced S-locus diversity should involve increased selection, we employ a statistical framework to ask whether S-locus selection intensities are higher in Physalis than Solanum. Because different S-RNase lineages diversify in Physalis and Solanum, we also ask whether different sites are under selection in different lineages. RESULTS: Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian coalescent methods found higher intensities of selection and more sites under significant positive selection in the 48 Physalis S-RNase alleles than the 49 from Solanum. Highest posterior densities of dN/dS (ω) estimates show that the strength of selection is greater for Physalis at 36 codons. A nested maximum likelihood method was more conservative, but still found 16 sites with greater selection in Physalis. Neither method found any codons under significantly greater selection in Solanum. A random effects likelihood method that examines data from both taxa jointly confirmed higher selection intensities in Physalis, but did not find different proportions of sites under selection in the two datasets. The greatest differences in strengths of selection were found in the most variable regions of the S-RNases, as expected if these regions encode self-recognition specificities. Clade-specific likelihood models indicated some codons were under greater selection in background Solanum lineages than in specific lineages of Physalis implying that selection on sites may differ among lineages. CONCLUSIONS: Likelihood and Bayesian methods provide a statistical approach to testing differential selection across populations or species. These tests appear robust to the levels of polymorphism found in diverse S-allele collections subject to strong balancing selection. As predicted, the intensity of selection at the S-locus was higher in the taxon with more recent S-locus diversification. This is the first confirmation by statistical test of differing selection intensities among self-incompatibility alleles from different populations or species. BioMed Central 2011-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3175474/ /pubmed/21854581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-243 Text en Copyright ©2011 Paape and Kohn; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Paape, Timothy
Kohn, Joshua R
Differential strengths of selection on S-RNases from Physalis and Solanum (Solanaceae)
title Differential strengths of selection on S-RNases from Physalis and Solanum (Solanaceae)
title_full Differential strengths of selection on S-RNases from Physalis and Solanum (Solanaceae)
title_fullStr Differential strengths of selection on S-RNases from Physalis and Solanum (Solanaceae)
title_full_unstemmed Differential strengths of selection on S-RNases from Physalis and Solanum (Solanaceae)
title_short Differential strengths of selection on S-RNases from Physalis and Solanum (Solanaceae)
title_sort differential strengths of selection on s-rnases from physalis and solanum (solanaceae)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3175474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21854581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-243
work_keys_str_mv AT paapetimothy differentialstrengthsofselectiononsrnasesfromphysalisandsolanumsolanaceae
AT kohnjoshuar differentialstrengthsofselectiononsrnasesfromphysalisandsolanumsolanaceae