Cargando…
Real and Pseudoaccommodation in Accommodative Lenses
In the attempt to manage presbyopia, different intraocular lens designs have been proposed such as monofocal IOLs with monovision or multifocal IOLs. Even though the lenses mentioned offer satisfactory visual results, contemporary ophthalmology has not completely answered the presbyopic dilemma by s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3175706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21941625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/284961 |
_version_ | 1782212170344300544 |
---|---|
author | Pallikaris, Ioannis G. Kontadakis, Georgios A. Portaliou, Dimitra M. |
author_facet | Pallikaris, Ioannis G. Kontadakis, Georgios A. Portaliou, Dimitra M. |
author_sort | Pallikaris, Ioannis G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the attempt to manage presbyopia, different intraocular lens designs have been proposed such as monofocal IOLs with monovision or multifocal IOLs. Even though the lenses mentioned offer satisfactory visual results, contemporary ophthalmology has not completely answered the presbyopic dilemma by simulating the accommodative properties of the crystalline lens itself. Accommodative IOLs were designed to fill this gap and provide satisfactory vision for all distances by restoring some degree of “pseudoaccommodation.” Pseudo accommodative capability can be linked to monofocal IOL's as well but the results are not satisfactory enough to fully support unaided near vision. Pseudoaccommodation is a complex phenomenon that can be attributed to several static (i.e., pupil size, against-the-rule cylindrical refractive error, multifocality of the cornea) and dynamic (i.e., anterior movement of the implant itself) factors. Objective measurement of the accommodative capability offered by the accommodative IOLs is extremely difficult to obtain, and different methods such as autorefractometers, retinoscopy, and ultrasound imaging during accommodative effort, ray tracing, or pharmacological stimulation have been developed but the results are sometimes inconsistent. Despite the difficulties in measuring accommodation, accommodative IOLs represent the future in the attempt to successfully “cure” presbyopia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3175706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31757062011-09-22 Real and Pseudoaccommodation in Accommodative Lenses Pallikaris, Ioannis G. Kontadakis, Georgios A. Portaliou, Dimitra M. J Ophthalmol Review Article In the attempt to manage presbyopia, different intraocular lens designs have been proposed such as monofocal IOLs with monovision or multifocal IOLs. Even though the lenses mentioned offer satisfactory visual results, contemporary ophthalmology has not completely answered the presbyopic dilemma by simulating the accommodative properties of the crystalline lens itself. Accommodative IOLs were designed to fill this gap and provide satisfactory vision for all distances by restoring some degree of “pseudoaccommodation.” Pseudo accommodative capability can be linked to monofocal IOL's as well but the results are not satisfactory enough to fully support unaided near vision. Pseudoaccommodation is a complex phenomenon that can be attributed to several static (i.e., pupil size, against-the-rule cylindrical refractive error, multifocality of the cornea) and dynamic (i.e., anterior movement of the implant itself) factors. Objective measurement of the accommodative capability offered by the accommodative IOLs is extremely difficult to obtain, and different methods such as autorefractometers, retinoscopy, and ultrasound imaging during accommodative effort, ray tracing, or pharmacological stimulation have been developed but the results are sometimes inconsistent. Despite the difficulties in measuring accommodation, accommodative IOLs represent the future in the attempt to successfully “cure” presbyopia. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2011 2011-09-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3175706/ /pubmed/21941625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/284961 Text en Copyright © 2011 Ioannis G. Pallikaris et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Pallikaris, Ioannis G. Kontadakis, Georgios A. Portaliou, Dimitra M. Real and Pseudoaccommodation in Accommodative Lenses |
title | Real and Pseudoaccommodation in Accommodative Lenses |
title_full | Real and Pseudoaccommodation in Accommodative Lenses |
title_fullStr | Real and Pseudoaccommodation in Accommodative Lenses |
title_full_unstemmed | Real and Pseudoaccommodation in Accommodative Lenses |
title_short | Real and Pseudoaccommodation in Accommodative Lenses |
title_sort | real and pseudoaccommodation in accommodative lenses |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3175706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21941625 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/284961 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pallikarisioannisg realandpseudoaccommodationinaccommodativelenses AT kontadakisgeorgiosa realandpseudoaccommodationinaccommodativelenses AT portalioudimitram realandpseudoaccommodationinaccommodativelenses |