Cargando…

Comparative efficacy of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus Supportive Psychotherapy for early onset chronic depression: design and rationale of a multisite randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Effective treatment strategies for chronic depression are urgently needed since it is not only a common and particularly disabling disorder, but is also considered treatment resistant by most clinicians. There are only a few studies on chronic depression indicating that traditional psych...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schramm, Elisabeth, Hautzinger, Martin, Zobel, Ingo, Kriston, Levente, Berger, Mathias, Härter, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3176185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21849054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-134
_version_ 1782212189872979968
author Schramm, Elisabeth
Hautzinger, Martin
Zobel, Ingo
Kriston, Levente
Berger, Mathias
Härter, Martin
author_facet Schramm, Elisabeth
Hautzinger, Martin
Zobel, Ingo
Kriston, Levente
Berger, Mathias
Härter, Martin
author_sort Schramm, Elisabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Effective treatment strategies for chronic depression are urgently needed since it is not only a common and particularly disabling disorder, but is also considered treatment resistant by most clinicians. There are only a few studies on chronic depression indicating that traditional psycho- and pharmacological interventions are not as effective as in acute, episodic depression. Current medications are no more effective than those introduced 50 years ago whereas the only psychotherapy developed specifically for the subgroup of chronic depression, the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP), faired well in one large trial. However, CBASP has never been directly compared to a non-specific control treatment. METHODS/DESIGN: The present article describes the study protocol of a multisite parallel-group randomized controlled trial in Germany. The purpose of the study is to estimate the efficacy of CBASP compared to supportive psychotherapy in 268 non-medicated early-onset chronically depressed outpatients. The intervention includes 20 weeks of acute treatment with 24 individual sessions followed by 28 weeks of continuation treatment with another 8 sessions. Depressive symptoms are evaluated 20 weeks after randomisation by means of the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression (HRSD). Secondary endpoints are depressive symptoms after 12 and 48 weeks, and remission after 12, 20, and 48 weeks. Primary outcome will be analysed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlled for pre-treatment scores and site. Analyses of continuous secondary variables will be performed using linear mixed models. For remission rates, chi-squared tests and logistic regression will be applied. DISCUSSION: The study evaluates the comparative effects of a disorder-specific psychotherapy and a well designed non-specific psychological approach in the acute and continuation treatment phase in a large sample of early-onset chronically depressed patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00970437).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3176185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31761852011-09-20 Comparative efficacy of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus Supportive Psychotherapy for early onset chronic depression: design and rationale of a multisite randomized controlled trial Schramm, Elisabeth Hautzinger, Martin Zobel, Ingo Kriston, Levente Berger, Mathias Härter, Martin BMC Psychiatry Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Effective treatment strategies for chronic depression are urgently needed since it is not only a common and particularly disabling disorder, but is also considered treatment resistant by most clinicians. There are only a few studies on chronic depression indicating that traditional psycho- and pharmacological interventions are not as effective as in acute, episodic depression. Current medications are no more effective than those introduced 50 years ago whereas the only psychotherapy developed specifically for the subgroup of chronic depression, the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP), faired well in one large trial. However, CBASP has never been directly compared to a non-specific control treatment. METHODS/DESIGN: The present article describes the study protocol of a multisite parallel-group randomized controlled trial in Germany. The purpose of the study is to estimate the efficacy of CBASP compared to supportive psychotherapy in 268 non-medicated early-onset chronically depressed outpatients. The intervention includes 20 weeks of acute treatment with 24 individual sessions followed by 28 weeks of continuation treatment with another 8 sessions. Depressive symptoms are evaluated 20 weeks after randomisation by means of the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression (HRSD). Secondary endpoints are depressive symptoms after 12 and 48 weeks, and remission after 12, 20, and 48 weeks. Primary outcome will be analysed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlled for pre-treatment scores and site. Analyses of continuous secondary variables will be performed using linear mixed models. For remission rates, chi-squared tests and logistic regression will be applied. DISCUSSION: The study evaluates the comparative effects of a disorder-specific psychotherapy and a well designed non-specific psychological approach in the acute and continuation treatment phase in a large sample of early-onset chronically depressed patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00970437). BioMed Central 2011-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3176185/ /pubmed/21849054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-134 Text en Copyright ©2011 Schramm et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Schramm, Elisabeth
Hautzinger, Martin
Zobel, Ingo
Kriston, Levente
Berger, Mathias
Härter, Martin
Comparative efficacy of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus Supportive Psychotherapy for early onset chronic depression: design and rationale of a multisite randomized controlled trial
title Comparative efficacy of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus Supportive Psychotherapy for early onset chronic depression: design and rationale of a multisite randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparative efficacy of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus Supportive Psychotherapy for early onset chronic depression: design and rationale of a multisite randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus Supportive Psychotherapy for early onset chronic depression: design and rationale of a multisite randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus Supportive Psychotherapy for early onset chronic depression: design and rationale of a multisite randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparative efficacy of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus Supportive Psychotherapy for early onset chronic depression: design and rationale of a multisite randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparative efficacy of the cognitive behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy versus supportive psychotherapy for early onset chronic depression: design and rationale of a multisite randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3176185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21849054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-11-134
work_keys_str_mv AT schrammelisabeth comparativeefficacyofthecognitivebehavioralanalysissystemofpsychotherapyversussupportivepsychotherapyforearlyonsetchronicdepressiondesignandrationaleofamultisiterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hautzingermartin comparativeefficacyofthecognitivebehavioralanalysissystemofpsychotherapyversussupportivepsychotherapyforearlyonsetchronicdepressiondesignandrationaleofamultisiterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zobelingo comparativeefficacyofthecognitivebehavioralanalysissystemofpsychotherapyversussupportivepsychotherapyforearlyonsetchronicdepressiondesignandrationaleofamultisiterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kristonlevente comparativeefficacyofthecognitivebehavioralanalysissystemofpsychotherapyversussupportivepsychotherapyforearlyonsetchronicdepressiondesignandrationaleofamultisiterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bergermathias comparativeefficacyofthecognitivebehavioralanalysissystemofpsychotherapyversussupportivepsychotherapyforearlyonsetchronicdepressiondesignandrationaleofamultisiterandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hartermartin comparativeefficacyofthecognitivebehavioralanalysissystemofpsychotherapyversussupportivepsychotherapyforearlyonsetchronicdepressiondesignandrationaleofamultisiterandomizedcontrolledtrial