Cargando…
Cytotoxicity of VEGF(121)/rGel on vascular endothelial cells resulting in inhibition of angiogenesis is mediated via VEGFR-2
BACKGROUND: The fusion protein VEGF(121)/rGel composed of the growth factor VEGF(121 )and the plant toxin gelonin targets the tumor neovasculature and exerts impressive anti-vascular effects. We have previously shown that VEGF(121)/rGel is cytotoxic to endothelial cells overexpressing VEGFR-2 but no...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3176242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21849059 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-11-358 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: The fusion protein VEGF(121)/rGel composed of the growth factor VEGF(121 )and the plant toxin gelonin targets the tumor neovasculature and exerts impressive anti-vascular effects. We have previously shown that VEGF(121)/rGel is cytotoxic to endothelial cells overexpressing VEGFR-2 but not to endothelial cells overexpressing VEGFR-1. In this study, we examined the basis for the specific toxicity of this construct and assessed its intracellular effects in vitro and in vivo. METHODS: We investigated the binding, cytotoxicity and internalization profile of VEGF(121)/rGel on endothelial cells expressing VEGFR-1 or VEGFR-2, identified its effects on angiogenesis models in vitro and ex vivo, and explored its intracellular effects on a number of molecular pathways using microarray analysis. RESULTS: Incubation of PAE/VEGFR-2 and PAE/VEGFR-1 cells with (125)I-VEGF(121)/rGel demonstrated binding specificity that was competed with unlabeled VEGF(121)/rGel but not with unlabeled gelonin. Assessment of the effect of VEGF(121)/rGel on blocking tube formation in vitro revealed a 100-fold difference in IC(50 )levels between PAE/VEGFR-2 (1 nM) and PAE/VEGFR-1 (100 nM) cells. VEGF(121)/rGel entered PAE/VEGFR-2 cells within one hour of treatment but was not detected in PAE/VEGFR-1 cells up to 24 hours after treatment. In vascularization studies using chicken chorioallantoic membranes, 1 nM VEGF(121)/rGel completely inhibited bFGF-stimulated neovascular growth. The cytotoxic effects of VEGF(121)/rGel were not apoptotic since treated cells were TUNEL-negative with no evidence of PARP cleavage or alteration in the protein levels of select apoptotic markers. Microarray analysis of VEGF(121)/rGel-treated HUVECs revealed the upregulation of a unique "fingerprint" profile of 22 genes that control cell adhesion, apoptosis, transcription regulation, chemotaxis, and inflammatory response. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these data confirm the selectivity of VEGF(121)/rGel for VEGFR-2-overexpressing endothelial cells and represent the first analysis of genes governing intoxication of mammalian endothelial cells by a gelonin-based targeted therapeutic agent. |
---|