Cargando…

Predicting Genetic Values: A Kernel-Based Best Linear Unbiased Prediction With Genomic Data

Genomic data provide a valuable source of information for modeling covariance structures, allowing a more accurate prediction of total genetic values (GVs). We apply the kriging concept, originally developed in the geostatistical context for predictions in the low-dimensional space, to the high-dime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ober, Ulrike, Erbe, Malena, Long, Nanye, Porcu, Emilio, Schlather, Martin, Simianer, Henner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Genetics Society of America 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3176539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21515573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.128694
_version_ 1782212236927827968
author Ober, Ulrike
Erbe, Malena
Long, Nanye
Porcu, Emilio
Schlather, Martin
Simianer, Henner
author_facet Ober, Ulrike
Erbe, Malena
Long, Nanye
Porcu, Emilio
Schlather, Martin
Simianer, Henner
author_sort Ober, Ulrike
collection PubMed
description Genomic data provide a valuable source of information for modeling covariance structures, allowing a more accurate prediction of total genetic values (GVs). We apply the kriging concept, originally developed in the geostatistical context for predictions in the low-dimensional space, to the high-dimensional space spanned by genomic single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) vectors and study its properties in different gene-action scenarios. Two different kriging methods [“universal kriging” (UK) and “simple kriging” (SK)] are presented. As a novelty, we suggest use of the family of Matérn covariance functions to model the covariance structure of SNP vectors. A genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) is applied as a reference method. The three approaches are compared in a whole-genome simulation study considering additive, additive-dominance, and epistatic gene-action models. Predictive performance is measured in terms of correlation between true and predicted GVs and average true GVs of the individuals ranked best by prediction. We show that UK outperforms GBLUP in the presence of dominance and epistatic effects. In a limiting case, it is shown that the genomic covariance structure proposed by VanRaden (2008) can be considered as a covariance function with corresponding quadratic variogram. We also prove theoretically that if a specific linear relationship exists between covariance matrices for two linear mixed models, the GVs resulting from BLUP are linked by a scaling factor. Finally, the relation of kriging to other models is discussed and further options for modeling the covariance structure, which might be more appropriate in the genomic context, are suggested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3176539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Genetics Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31765392012-07-01 Predicting Genetic Values: A Kernel-Based Best Linear Unbiased Prediction With Genomic Data Ober, Ulrike Erbe, Malena Long, Nanye Porcu, Emilio Schlather, Martin Simianer, Henner Genetics Investigations Genomic data provide a valuable source of information for modeling covariance structures, allowing a more accurate prediction of total genetic values (GVs). We apply the kriging concept, originally developed in the geostatistical context for predictions in the low-dimensional space, to the high-dimensional space spanned by genomic single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) vectors and study its properties in different gene-action scenarios. Two different kriging methods [“universal kriging” (UK) and “simple kriging” (SK)] are presented. As a novelty, we suggest use of the family of Matérn covariance functions to model the covariance structure of SNP vectors. A genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) is applied as a reference method. The three approaches are compared in a whole-genome simulation study considering additive, additive-dominance, and epistatic gene-action models. Predictive performance is measured in terms of correlation between true and predicted GVs and average true GVs of the individuals ranked best by prediction. We show that UK outperforms GBLUP in the presence of dominance and epistatic effects. In a limiting case, it is shown that the genomic covariance structure proposed by VanRaden (2008) can be considered as a covariance function with corresponding quadratic variogram. We also prove theoretically that if a specific linear relationship exists between covariance matrices for two linear mixed models, the GVs resulting from BLUP are linked by a scaling factor. Finally, the relation of kriging to other models is discussed and further options for modeling the covariance structure, which might be more appropriate in the genomic context, are suggested. Genetics Society of America 2011-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3176539/ /pubmed/21515573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.128694 Text en Copyright © 2011 by the Genetics Society of America Available freely online through the author-supported open access option.
spellingShingle Investigations
Ober, Ulrike
Erbe, Malena
Long, Nanye
Porcu, Emilio
Schlather, Martin
Simianer, Henner
Predicting Genetic Values: A Kernel-Based Best Linear Unbiased Prediction With Genomic Data
title Predicting Genetic Values: A Kernel-Based Best Linear Unbiased Prediction With Genomic Data
title_full Predicting Genetic Values: A Kernel-Based Best Linear Unbiased Prediction With Genomic Data
title_fullStr Predicting Genetic Values: A Kernel-Based Best Linear Unbiased Prediction With Genomic Data
title_full_unstemmed Predicting Genetic Values: A Kernel-Based Best Linear Unbiased Prediction With Genomic Data
title_short Predicting Genetic Values: A Kernel-Based Best Linear Unbiased Prediction With Genomic Data
title_sort predicting genetic values: a kernel-based best linear unbiased prediction with genomic data
topic Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3176539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21515573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.128694
work_keys_str_mv AT oberulrike predictinggeneticvaluesakernelbasedbestlinearunbiasedpredictionwithgenomicdata
AT erbemalena predictinggeneticvaluesakernelbasedbestlinearunbiasedpredictionwithgenomicdata
AT longnanye predictinggeneticvaluesakernelbasedbestlinearunbiasedpredictionwithgenomicdata
AT porcuemilio predictinggeneticvaluesakernelbasedbestlinearunbiasedpredictionwithgenomicdata
AT schlathermartin predictinggeneticvaluesakernelbasedbestlinearunbiasedpredictionwithgenomicdata
AT simianerhenner predictinggeneticvaluesakernelbasedbestlinearunbiasedpredictionwithgenomicdata