Cargando…

Active Inference, Attention, and Motor Preparation

Perception is the foundation of cognition and is fundamental to our beliefs and consequent action planning. The Editorial (this issue) asks: “what mechanisms, if any, mediate between perceptual and cognitive processes?” It has recently been argued that attention might furnish such a mechanism. In th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Harriet, Friston, Karl, Bestmann, Sven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3177296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21960978
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00218
_version_ 1782212287838289920
author Brown, Harriet
Friston, Karl
Bestmann, Sven
author_facet Brown, Harriet
Friston, Karl
Bestmann, Sven
author_sort Brown, Harriet
collection PubMed
description Perception is the foundation of cognition and is fundamental to our beliefs and consequent action planning. The Editorial (this issue) asks: “what mechanisms, if any, mediate between perceptual and cognitive processes?” It has recently been argued that attention might furnish such a mechanism. In this paper, we pursue the idea that action planning (motor preparation) is an attentional phenomenon directed toward kinesthetic signals. This rests on a view of motor control as active inference, where predictions of proprioceptive signals are fulfilled by peripheral motor reflexes. If valid, active inference suggests that attention should not be limited to the optimal biasing of perceptual signals in the exteroceptive (e.g., visual) domain but should also bias proprioceptive signals during movement. Here, we investigate this idea using a classical attention (Posner) paradigm cast in a motor setting. Specially, we looked for decreases in reaction times when movements were preceded by valid relative to invalid cues. Furthermore, we addressed the hierarchical level at which putative attentional effects were expressed by independently cueing the nature of the movement and the hand used to execute it. We found a significant interaction between the validity of movement and effector cues on reaction times. This suggests that attentional bias might be mediated at a low level in the motor hierarchy, in an intrinsic frame of reference. This finding is consistent with attentional enabling of top-down predictions of proprioceptive input and may rely upon the same synaptic mechanisms that mediate directed spatial attention in the visual system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3177296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31772962011-09-29 Active Inference, Attention, and Motor Preparation Brown, Harriet Friston, Karl Bestmann, Sven Front Psychol Psychology Perception is the foundation of cognition and is fundamental to our beliefs and consequent action planning. The Editorial (this issue) asks: “what mechanisms, if any, mediate between perceptual and cognitive processes?” It has recently been argued that attention might furnish such a mechanism. In this paper, we pursue the idea that action planning (motor preparation) is an attentional phenomenon directed toward kinesthetic signals. This rests on a view of motor control as active inference, where predictions of proprioceptive signals are fulfilled by peripheral motor reflexes. If valid, active inference suggests that attention should not be limited to the optimal biasing of perceptual signals in the exteroceptive (e.g., visual) domain but should also bias proprioceptive signals during movement. Here, we investigate this idea using a classical attention (Posner) paradigm cast in a motor setting. Specially, we looked for decreases in reaction times when movements were preceded by valid relative to invalid cues. Furthermore, we addressed the hierarchical level at which putative attentional effects were expressed by independently cueing the nature of the movement and the hand used to execute it. We found a significant interaction between the validity of movement and effector cues on reaction times. This suggests that attentional bias might be mediated at a low level in the motor hierarchy, in an intrinsic frame of reference. This finding is consistent with attentional enabling of top-down predictions of proprioceptive input and may rely upon the same synaptic mechanisms that mediate directed spatial attention in the visual system. Frontiers Research Foundation 2011-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3177296/ /pubmed/21960978 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00218 Text en Copyright © 2011 Brown, Friston and Bestmann. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article subject to a non-exclusive license between the authors and Frontiers Media SA, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and other Frontiers conditions are complied with.
spellingShingle Psychology
Brown, Harriet
Friston, Karl
Bestmann, Sven
Active Inference, Attention, and Motor Preparation
title Active Inference, Attention, and Motor Preparation
title_full Active Inference, Attention, and Motor Preparation
title_fullStr Active Inference, Attention, and Motor Preparation
title_full_unstemmed Active Inference, Attention, and Motor Preparation
title_short Active Inference, Attention, and Motor Preparation
title_sort active inference, attention, and motor preparation
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3177296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21960978
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00218
work_keys_str_mv AT brownharriet activeinferenceattentionandmotorpreparation
AT fristonkarl activeinferenceattentionandmotorpreparation
AT bestmannsven activeinferenceattentionandmotorpreparation