Cargando…

A Comparision of Two Types of Decalcified Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in Treatment of Dehiscence Defects around Implants in Dogs

BACKGROUND: Decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) may have the potential to enhance bone formation around dental implants. Our aim in this study was the evaluation and comparison of two types of DFDBA in treatment of dehiscence defects around Euroteknika(®) implants in dogs. METHODS: In th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abed, Ahmad Moghareh, Pestekan, Rasool Heidari, Yaghini, Jaber, Razavi, Seyed Mohammad, Tavakoli, Mohammad, Amjadi, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3177388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22013476
_version_ 1782212295042007040
author Abed, Ahmad Moghareh
Pestekan, Rasool Heidari
Yaghini, Jaber
Razavi, Seyed Mohammad
Tavakoli, Mohammad
Amjadi, Mohammad
author_facet Abed, Ahmad Moghareh
Pestekan, Rasool Heidari
Yaghini, Jaber
Razavi, Seyed Mohammad
Tavakoli, Mohammad
Amjadi, Mohammad
author_sort Abed, Ahmad Moghareh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) may have the potential to enhance bone formation around dental implants. Our aim in this study was the evaluation and comparison of two types of DFDBA in treatment of dehiscence defects around Euroteknika(®) implants in dogs. METHODS: In this prospective clinical trial animal study, all mandibular premolars of three Iranian dogs were extracted. After 3 months of healing, fifteen SLA type Euroteknika(®) dental implants (Natea) with 4.1mm diameter and 10mm length were placed in osteotomy sites with dehiscence defects of 5mm length, 4 mm width, and 3mm depth. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures were performed using Cenobone and collagen membrane for six implants, the other six implants received Dembone and collagen membrane and the final three implants received only collagen membrane. All implants were submerged. After 4 months of healing, implants were uncovered and stability (Implant Stability Quotient) of all implants was measured. Then, block biopsies of each implant site were taken and processed for ground sectioning and histomorphometric analysis. The data was analyzed by ANOVA and Pearson tests. P value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant. RESULTS: All implants osseointegrated after 4 months. The mean values of bone to implant contact for histomorphometric measurements of Cenobone, Denobone, and control groups were 77.36 ± 9.96%, 78.91 ± 11.9% and 71.56 ± 5.61% respectively, with no significant differences among the various treatment groups. The correlation of Implant Stability Quotient and histomorphometric techniques was 0.692. CONCLUSION: In treating of dehiscence defects with GBR technique in this study, adding DFDBA did not significantly enhance the percentages of bone-to-implant contact measurements; and Implant Stability Quotient Resonance Frequency Analysis appeared to be a precise technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3177388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31773882011-10-19 A Comparision of Two Types of Decalcified Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in Treatment of Dehiscence Defects around Implants in Dogs Abed, Ahmad Moghareh Pestekan, Rasool Heidari Yaghini, Jaber Razavi, Seyed Mohammad Tavakoli, Mohammad Amjadi, Mohammad Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) may have the potential to enhance bone formation around dental implants. Our aim in this study was the evaluation and comparison of two types of DFDBA in treatment of dehiscence defects around Euroteknika(®) implants in dogs. METHODS: In this prospective clinical trial animal study, all mandibular premolars of three Iranian dogs were extracted. After 3 months of healing, fifteen SLA type Euroteknika(®) dental implants (Natea) with 4.1mm diameter and 10mm length were placed in osteotomy sites with dehiscence defects of 5mm length, 4 mm width, and 3mm depth. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures were performed using Cenobone and collagen membrane for six implants, the other six implants received Dembone and collagen membrane and the final three implants received only collagen membrane. All implants were submerged. After 4 months of healing, implants were uncovered and stability (Implant Stability Quotient) of all implants was measured. Then, block biopsies of each implant site were taken and processed for ground sectioning and histomorphometric analysis. The data was analyzed by ANOVA and Pearson tests. P value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant. RESULTS: All implants osseointegrated after 4 months. The mean values of bone to implant contact for histomorphometric measurements of Cenobone, Denobone, and control groups were 77.36 ± 9.96%, 78.91 ± 11.9% and 71.56 ± 5.61% respectively, with no significant differences among the various treatment groups. The correlation of Implant Stability Quotient and histomorphometric techniques was 0.692. CONCLUSION: In treating of dehiscence defects with GBR technique in this study, adding DFDBA did not significantly enhance the percentages of bone-to-implant contact measurements; and Implant Stability Quotient Resonance Frequency Analysis appeared to be a precise technique. Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3177388/ /pubmed/22013476 Text en Copyright: © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abed, Ahmad Moghareh
Pestekan, Rasool Heidari
Yaghini, Jaber
Razavi, Seyed Mohammad
Tavakoli, Mohammad
Amjadi, Mohammad
A Comparision of Two Types of Decalcified Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in Treatment of Dehiscence Defects around Implants in Dogs
title A Comparision of Two Types of Decalcified Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in Treatment of Dehiscence Defects around Implants in Dogs
title_full A Comparision of Two Types of Decalcified Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in Treatment of Dehiscence Defects around Implants in Dogs
title_fullStr A Comparision of Two Types of Decalcified Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in Treatment of Dehiscence Defects around Implants in Dogs
title_full_unstemmed A Comparision of Two Types of Decalcified Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in Treatment of Dehiscence Defects around Implants in Dogs
title_short A Comparision of Two Types of Decalcified Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in Treatment of Dehiscence Defects around Implants in Dogs
title_sort comparision of two types of decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft in treatment of dehiscence defects around implants in dogs
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3177388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22013476
work_keys_str_mv AT abedahmadmoghareh acomparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs
AT pestekanrasoolheidari acomparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs
AT yaghinijaber acomparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs
AT razaviseyedmohammad acomparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs
AT tavakolimohammad acomparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs
AT amjadimohammad acomparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs
AT abedahmadmoghareh comparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs
AT pestekanrasoolheidari comparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs
AT yaghinijaber comparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs
AT razaviseyedmohammad comparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs
AT tavakolimohammad comparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs
AT amjadimohammad comparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs