Cargando…
A Comparision of Two Types of Decalcified Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in Treatment of Dehiscence Defects around Implants in Dogs
BACKGROUND: Decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) may have the potential to enhance bone formation around dental implants. Our aim in this study was the evaluation and comparison of two types of DFDBA in treatment of dehiscence defects around Euroteknika(®) implants in dogs. METHODS: In th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3177388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22013476 |
_version_ | 1782212295042007040 |
---|---|
author | Abed, Ahmad Moghareh Pestekan, Rasool Heidari Yaghini, Jaber Razavi, Seyed Mohammad Tavakoli, Mohammad Amjadi, Mohammad |
author_facet | Abed, Ahmad Moghareh Pestekan, Rasool Heidari Yaghini, Jaber Razavi, Seyed Mohammad Tavakoli, Mohammad Amjadi, Mohammad |
author_sort | Abed, Ahmad Moghareh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) may have the potential to enhance bone formation around dental implants. Our aim in this study was the evaluation and comparison of two types of DFDBA in treatment of dehiscence defects around Euroteknika(®) implants in dogs. METHODS: In this prospective clinical trial animal study, all mandibular premolars of three Iranian dogs were extracted. After 3 months of healing, fifteen SLA type Euroteknika(®) dental implants (Natea) with 4.1mm diameter and 10mm length were placed in osteotomy sites with dehiscence defects of 5mm length, 4 mm width, and 3mm depth. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures were performed using Cenobone and collagen membrane for six implants, the other six implants received Dembone and collagen membrane and the final three implants received only collagen membrane. All implants were submerged. After 4 months of healing, implants were uncovered and stability (Implant Stability Quotient) of all implants was measured. Then, block biopsies of each implant site were taken and processed for ground sectioning and histomorphometric analysis. The data was analyzed by ANOVA and Pearson tests. P value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant. RESULTS: All implants osseointegrated after 4 months. The mean values of bone to implant contact for histomorphometric measurements of Cenobone, Denobone, and control groups were 77.36 ± 9.96%, 78.91 ± 11.9% and 71.56 ± 5.61% respectively, with no significant differences among the various treatment groups. The correlation of Implant Stability Quotient and histomorphometric techniques was 0.692. CONCLUSION: In treating of dehiscence defects with GBR technique in this study, adding DFDBA did not significantly enhance the percentages of bone-to-implant contact measurements; and Implant Stability Quotient Resonance Frequency Analysis appeared to be a precise technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3177388 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31773882011-10-19 A Comparision of Two Types of Decalcified Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in Treatment of Dehiscence Defects around Implants in Dogs Abed, Ahmad Moghareh Pestekan, Rasool Heidari Yaghini, Jaber Razavi, Seyed Mohammad Tavakoli, Mohammad Amjadi, Mohammad Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) may have the potential to enhance bone formation around dental implants. Our aim in this study was the evaluation and comparison of two types of DFDBA in treatment of dehiscence defects around Euroteknika(®) implants in dogs. METHODS: In this prospective clinical trial animal study, all mandibular premolars of three Iranian dogs were extracted. After 3 months of healing, fifteen SLA type Euroteknika(®) dental implants (Natea) with 4.1mm diameter and 10mm length were placed in osteotomy sites with dehiscence defects of 5mm length, 4 mm width, and 3mm depth. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures were performed using Cenobone and collagen membrane for six implants, the other six implants received Dembone and collagen membrane and the final three implants received only collagen membrane. All implants were submerged. After 4 months of healing, implants were uncovered and stability (Implant Stability Quotient) of all implants was measured. Then, block biopsies of each implant site were taken and processed for ground sectioning and histomorphometric analysis. The data was analyzed by ANOVA and Pearson tests. P value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant. RESULTS: All implants osseointegrated after 4 months. The mean values of bone to implant contact for histomorphometric measurements of Cenobone, Denobone, and control groups were 77.36 ± 9.96%, 78.91 ± 11.9% and 71.56 ± 5.61% respectively, with no significant differences among the various treatment groups. The correlation of Implant Stability Quotient and histomorphometric techniques was 0.692. CONCLUSION: In treating of dehiscence defects with GBR technique in this study, adding DFDBA did not significantly enhance the percentages of bone-to-implant contact measurements; and Implant Stability Quotient Resonance Frequency Analysis appeared to be a precise technique. Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3177388/ /pubmed/22013476 Text en Copyright: © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Abed, Ahmad Moghareh Pestekan, Rasool Heidari Yaghini, Jaber Razavi, Seyed Mohammad Tavakoli, Mohammad Amjadi, Mohammad A Comparision of Two Types of Decalcified Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in Treatment of Dehiscence Defects around Implants in Dogs |
title | A Comparision of Two Types of Decalcified Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in Treatment of Dehiscence Defects around Implants in Dogs |
title_full | A Comparision of Two Types of Decalcified Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in Treatment of Dehiscence Defects around Implants in Dogs |
title_fullStr | A Comparision of Two Types of Decalcified Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in Treatment of Dehiscence Defects around Implants in Dogs |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparision of Two Types of Decalcified Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in Treatment of Dehiscence Defects around Implants in Dogs |
title_short | A Comparision of Two Types of Decalcified Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft in Treatment of Dehiscence Defects around Implants in Dogs |
title_sort | comparision of two types of decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft in treatment of dehiscence defects around implants in dogs |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3177388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22013476 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abedahmadmoghareh acomparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs AT pestekanrasoolheidari acomparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs AT yaghinijaber acomparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs AT razaviseyedmohammad acomparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs AT tavakolimohammad acomparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs AT amjadimohammad acomparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs AT abedahmadmoghareh comparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs AT pestekanrasoolheidari comparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs AT yaghinijaber comparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs AT razaviseyedmohammad comparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs AT tavakolimohammad comparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs AT amjadimohammad comparisionoftwotypesofdecalcifiedfreezedriedboneallograftintreatmentofdehiscencedefectsaroundimplantsindogs |