Cargando…

Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Toothpastes and Mouthrinses: An In Vitro Study

BACKGROUND: Anti-microbial agents have been used as a chemotherapeutic agent to improve oral health. This in vitro study was carried out to determine antimicrobial efficacy of different toothpastes and mouthrinses against the oral pathogens. METHODS: A total of five toothpastes and five mouthrinses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Prasanth, Manupati
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3177399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22013468
_version_ 1782212297520840704
author Prasanth, Manupati
author_facet Prasanth, Manupati
author_sort Prasanth, Manupati
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anti-microbial agents have been used as a chemotherapeutic agent to improve oral health. This in vitro study was carried out to determine antimicrobial efficacy of different toothpastes and mouthrinses against the oral pathogens. METHODS: A total of five toothpastes and five mouthrinses were tested for their antimicrobial activity against three oral pathogens namely, Streptococcus mutans (MTCC 890), Escherichia coli (MTCC 579) and Candida albicans (MTCC 854) by well agar diffusion assay. Statistical Analysis was performed using a statistical package, SPSS windows version 15, by applying mean values using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc least square differences (LSD) method(α = 0.05). RESULTS: Toothpaste formulation A showed maximum zones of inhibition against the test organism, Escherichia coli (P<60;0.001) compared to all other toothpastes formulations. Against Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans, the zones of inhibition were less in comparison to E.coli but were significantly different at higher dilutions (1:8, 1:16 P<60;0.05) for toothpaste formulation A. Mouthrinses formulation H showed maximum efficacy against the test organism, Escherichia coli (P<60;0.001) compared to all other mouthrinse formulations. Against Streptococcus mutans, mouthrinses formulations F, G and J showed significant antimicrobial activity (P<60;0.05) compared to formulation H and I. CONCLUSION: In the present study, it has been demonstrated that triclosan containing toothpastes formulations are more effective in control of oral microflora compared to non-triclosan containing synthetic toothpastes. Among mouthrinses formulations, chlorhexidine was found to be more effective than or as effective as triclosan against the organisms tested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3177399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31773992011-10-19 Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Toothpastes and Mouthrinses: An In Vitro Study Prasanth, Manupati Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Anti-microbial agents have been used as a chemotherapeutic agent to improve oral health. This in vitro study was carried out to determine antimicrobial efficacy of different toothpastes and mouthrinses against the oral pathogens. METHODS: A total of five toothpastes and five mouthrinses were tested for their antimicrobial activity against three oral pathogens namely, Streptococcus mutans (MTCC 890), Escherichia coli (MTCC 579) and Candida albicans (MTCC 854) by well agar diffusion assay. Statistical Analysis was performed using a statistical package, SPSS windows version 15, by applying mean values using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc least square differences (LSD) method(α = 0.05). RESULTS: Toothpaste formulation A showed maximum zones of inhibition against the test organism, Escherichia coli (P<60;0.001) compared to all other toothpastes formulations. Against Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans, the zones of inhibition were less in comparison to E.coli but were significantly different at higher dilutions (1:8, 1:16 P<60;0.05) for toothpaste formulation A. Mouthrinses formulation H showed maximum efficacy against the test organism, Escherichia coli (P<60;0.001) compared to all other mouthrinse formulations. Against Streptococcus mutans, mouthrinses formulations F, G and J showed significant antimicrobial activity (P<60;0.05) compared to formulation H and I. CONCLUSION: In the present study, it has been demonstrated that triclosan containing toothpastes formulations are more effective in control of oral microflora compared to non-triclosan containing synthetic toothpastes. Among mouthrinses formulations, chlorhexidine was found to be more effective than or as effective as triclosan against the organisms tested. Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3177399/ /pubmed/22013468 Text en © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Prasanth, Manupati
Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Toothpastes and Mouthrinses: An In Vitro Study
title Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Toothpastes and Mouthrinses: An In Vitro Study
title_full Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Toothpastes and Mouthrinses: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Toothpastes and Mouthrinses: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Toothpastes and Mouthrinses: An In Vitro Study
title_short Antimicrobial Efficacy of Different Toothpastes and Mouthrinses: An In Vitro Study
title_sort antimicrobial efficacy of different toothpastes and mouthrinses: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3177399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22013468
work_keys_str_mv AT prasanthmanupati antimicrobialefficacyofdifferenttoothpastesandmouthrinsesaninvitrostudy