Cargando…

A New Way to Measure the World's Protected Area Coverage

Protected areas are effective at stopping biodiversity loss, but their placement is constrained by the needs of people. Consequently protected areas are often biased toward areas that are unattractive for other human uses. Current reporting metrics that emphasise the total area protected do not acco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barr, Lissa M., Pressey, Robert L., Fuller, Richard A., Segan, Daniel B., McDonald-Madden, Eve, Possingham, Hugh P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3177831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21957458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024707
_version_ 1782212337320591360
author Barr, Lissa M.
Pressey, Robert L.
Fuller, Richard A.
Segan, Daniel B.
McDonald-Madden, Eve
Possingham, Hugh P.
author_facet Barr, Lissa M.
Pressey, Robert L.
Fuller, Richard A.
Segan, Daniel B.
McDonald-Madden, Eve
Possingham, Hugh P.
author_sort Barr, Lissa M.
collection PubMed
description Protected areas are effective at stopping biodiversity loss, but their placement is constrained by the needs of people. Consequently protected areas are often biased toward areas that are unattractive for other human uses. Current reporting metrics that emphasise the total area protected do not account for this bias. To address this problem we propose that the distribution of protected areas be evaluated with an economic metric used to quantify inequality in income— the Gini coefficient. Using a modified version of this measure we discover that 73% of countries have inequitably protected their biodiversity and that common measures of protected area coverage do not adequately reveal this bias. Used in combination with total percentage protection, the Gini coefficient will improve the effectiveness of reporting on the growth of protected area coverage, paving the way for better representation of the world's biodiversity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3177831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31778312011-09-28 A New Way to Measure the World's Protected Area Coverage Barr, Lissa M. Pressey, Robert L. Fuller, Richard A. Segan, Daniel B. McDonald-Madden, Eve Possingham, Hugh P. PLoS One Research Article Protected areas are effective at stopping biodiversity loss, but their placement is constrained by the needs of people. Consequently protected areas are often biased toward areas that are unattractive for other human uses. Current reporting metrics that emphasise the total area protected do not account for this bias. To address this problem we propose that the distribution of protected areas be evaluated with an economic metric used to quantify inequality in income— the Gini coefficient. Using a modified version of this measure we discover that 73% of countries have inequitably protected their biodiversity and that common measures of protected area coverage do not adequately reveal this bias. Used in combination with total percentage protection, the Gini coefficient will improve the effectiveness of reporting on the growth of protected area coverage, paving the way for better representation of the world's biodiversity. Public Library of Science 2011-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3177831/ /pubmed/21957458 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024707 Text en Barr et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barr, Lissa M.
Pressey, Robert L.
Fuller, Richard A.
Segan, Daniel B.
McDonald-Madden, Eve
Possingham, Hugh P.
A New Way to Measure the World's Protected Area Coverage
title A New Way to Measure the World's Protected Area Coverage
title_full A New Way to Measure the World's Protected Area Coverage
title_fullStr A New Way to Measure the World's Protected Area Coverage
title_full_unstemmed A New Way to Measure the World's Protected Area Coverage
title_short A New Way to Measure the World's Protected Area Coverage
title_sort new way to measure the world's protected area coverage
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3177831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21957458
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0024707
work_keys_str_mv AT barrlissam anewwaytomeasuretheworldsprotectedareacoverage
AT presseyrobertl anewwaytomeasuretheworldsprotectedareacoverage
AT fullerricharda anewwaytomeasuretheworldsprotectedareacoverage
AT segandanielb anewwaytomeasuretheworldsprotectedareacoverage
AT mcdonaldmaddeneve anewwaytomeasuretheworldsprotectedareacoverage
AT possinghamhughp anewwaytomeasuretheworldsprotectedareacoverage
AT barrlissam newwaytomeasuretheworldsprotectedareacoverage
AT presseyrobertl newwaytomeasuretheworldsprotectedareacoverage
AT fullerricharda newwaytomeasuretheworldsprotectedareacoverage
AT segandanielb newwaytomeasuretheworldsprotectedareacoverage
AT mcdonaldmaddeneve newwaytomeasuretheworldsprotectedareacoverage
AT possinghamhughp newwaytomeasuretheworldsprotectedareacoverage