Cargando…

Motivational State and Reward Content Determine Choice Behavior under Risk in Mice

Risk is a ubiquitous feature of the environment for most organisms, who must often choose between a small and certain reward and a larger but less certain reward. To study choice behavior under risk in a genetically well characterized species, we trained mice (C57BL/6) on a discrete trial, concurren...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leblond, Mona, Fan, David, Brynildsen, Julia K., Yin, Henry H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3178642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21966504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025342
_version_ 1782212423133954048
author Leblond, Mona
Fan, David
Brynildsen, Julia K.
Yin, Henry H.
author_facet Leblond, Mona
Fan, David
Brynildsen, Julia K.
Yin, Henry H.
author_sort Leblond, Mona
collection PubMed
description Risk is a ubiquitous feature of the environment for most organisms, who must often choose between a small and certain reward and a larger but less certain reward. To study choice behavior under risk in a genetically well characterized species, we trained mice (C57BL/6) on a discrete trial, concurrent-choice task in which they must choose between two levers. Pressing one lever (safe choice) is always followed by a small reward. Pressing the other lever (risky choice) is followed by a larger reward, but only on some of the trials. The overall payoff is the same on both levers. When mice were not food deprived, they were indifferent to risk, choosing both levers with equal probability regardless of the level of risk. In contrast, following food or water deprivation, mice earning 10% sucrose solution were risk-averse, though the addition of alcohol to the sucrose solution dose-dependently reduced risk aversion, even before the mice became intoxicated. Our results falsify the budget rule in optimal foraging theory often used to explain behavior under risk. Instead, they suggest that the overall demand or desired amount for a particular reward determines risk preference. Changes in motivational state or reward identity affect risk preference by changing demand. Any manipulation that increases the demand for a reward also increases risk aversion, by selectively increasing the frequency of safe choices without affecting frequency of risky choices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3178642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31786422011-09-30 Motivational State and Reward Content Determine Choice Behavior under Risk in Mice Leblond, Mona Fan, David Brynildsen, Julia K. Yin, Henry H. PLoS One Research Article Risk is a ubiquitous feature of the environment for most organisms, who must often choose between a small and certain reward and a larger but less certain reward. To study choice behavior under risk in a genetically well characterized species, we trained mice (C57BL/6) on a discrete trial, concurrent-choice task in which they must choose between two levers. Pressing one lever (safe choice) is always followed by a small reward. Pressing the other lever (risky choice) is followed by a larger reward, but only on some of the trials. The overall payoff is the same on both levers. When mice were not food deprived, they were indifferent to risk, choosing both levers with equal probability regardless of the level of risk. In contrast, following food or water deprivation, mice earning 10% sucrose solution were risk-averse, though the addition of alcohol to the sucrose solution dose-dependently reduced risk aversion, even before the mice became intoxicated. Our results falsify the budget rule in optimal foraging theory often used to explain behavior under risk. Instead, they suggest that the overall demand or desired amount for a particular reward determines risk preference. Changes in motivational state or reward identity affect risk preference by changing demand. Any manipulation that increases the demand for a reward also increases risk aversion, by selectively increasing the frequency of safe choices without affecting frequency of risky choices. Public Library of Science 2011-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3178642/ /pubmed/21966504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025342 Text en Leblond et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leblond, Mona
Fan, David
Brynildsen, Julia K.
Yin, Henry H.
Motivational State and Reward Content Determine Choice Behavior under Risk in Mice
title Motivational State and Reward Content Determine Choice Behavior under Risk in Mice
title_full Motivational State and Reward Content Determine Choice Behavior under Risk in Mice
title_fullStr Motivational State and Reward Content Determine Choice Behavior under Risk in Mice
title_full_unstemmed Motivational State and Reward Content Determine Choice Behavior under Risk in Mice
title_short Motivational State and Reward Content Determine Choice Behavior under Risk in Mice
title_sort motivational state and reward content determine choice behavior under risk in mice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3178642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21966504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025342
work_keys_str_mv AT leblondmona motivationalstateandrewardcontentdeterminechoicebehaviorunderriskinmice
AT fandavid motivationalstateandrewardcontentdeterminechoicebehaviorunderriskinmice
AT brynildsenjuliak motivationalstateandrewardcontentdeterminechoicebehaviorunderriskinmice
AT yinhenryh motivationalstateandrewardcontentdeterminechoicebehaviorunderriskinmice