Cargando…

Intravitreal Bevacizumab Alone versus Combined with Macular Photocoagulation in Diabetic Macular Edema

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy between intravitreal bevacizumab and combination treatment (bevacizumab and macular photocoagulation) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). In addtion, changes of DME type were researched using optical coherence tomography. METHODS: The present study inc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Soo Jeong, Kim, Ei Tae, Moon, Yeon Sung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3178762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21976935
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2011.25.5.299
_version_ 1782212431678799872
author Lee, Soo Jeong
Kim, Ei Tae
Moon, Yeon Sung
author_facet Lee, Soo Jeong
Kim, Ei Tae
Moon, Yeon Sung
author_sort Lee, Soo Jeong
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy between intravitreal bevacizumab and combination treatment (bevacizumab and macular photocoagulation) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). In addtion, changes of DME type were researched using optical coherence tomography. METHODS: The present study included 90 eyes with bevacizumab injection and 38 eyes with combination treatment. Using chart records, patients were reviewed until 6 months after treatment. The present study compared changes of visual acuity (VA) and macular thickness at each follow up. DME was classified into 4 types and the morphologic pattern was compared. RESULTS: In patients with the bevacizumab injection only, VA improved from 0.29 ± 0.18 to 0.48 ± 0.26 at 1 month and returned to 0.32 ± 0.20 at 6 months after treatment. In the combination treatment, VA improved from 0.32 ± 0.22 to 0.52 ± 0.26 at 1 month and returned to 0.36 ± 0.18 at 6 months after treatment. There was no significant improvement of VA at the final follow-up with either treatment. There was significant decrease of macular thickness except in the mixed DME type. CONCLUSIONS: The combination treatment did not yield better VA or macular thickness reduction at 6 months than bevacizumab injection alone. By classifying and observing the change of DME type, determining the treatment objectively and predicting the effectiveness of treatment can be helpful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3178762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31787622011-10-05 Intravitreal Bevacizumab Alone versus Combined with Macular Photocoagulation in Diabetic Macular Edema Lee, Soo Jeong Kim, Ei Tae Moon, Yeon Sung Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy between intravitreal bevacizumab and combination treatment (bevacizumab and macular photocoagulation) for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). In addtion, changes of DME type were researched using optical coherence tomography. METHODS: The present study included 90 eyes with bevacizumab injection and 38 eyes with combination treatment. Using chart records, patients were reviewed until 6 months after treatment. The present study compared changes of visual acuity (VA) and macular thickness at each follow up. DME was classified into 4 types and the morphologic pattern was compared. RESULTS: In patients with the bevacizumab injection only, VA improved from 0.29 ± 0.18 to 0.48 ± 0.26 at 1 month and returned to 0.32 ± 0.20 at 6 months after treatment. In the combination treatment, VA improved from 0.32 ± 0.22 to 0.52 ± 0.26 at 1 month and returned to 0.36 ± 0.18 at 6 months after treatment. There was no significant improvement of VA at the final follow-up with either treatment. There was significant decrease of macular thickness except in the mixed DME type. CONCLUSIONS: The combination treatment did not yield better VA or macular thickness reduction at 6 months than bevacizumab injection alone. By classifying and observing the change of DME type, determining the treatment objectively and predicting the effectiveness of treatment can be helpful. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2011-10 2011-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3178762/ /pubmed/21976935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2011.25.5.299 Text en © 2011 The Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Soo Jeong
Kim, Ei Tae
Moon, Yeon Sung
Intravitreal Bevacizumab Alone versus Combined with Macular Photocoagulation in Diabetic Macular Edema
title Intravitreal Bevacizumab Alone versus Combined with Macular Photocoagulation in Diabetic Macular Edema
title_full Intravitreal Bevacizumab Alone versus Combined with Macular Photocoagulation in Diabetic Macular Edema
title_fullStr Intravitreal Bevacizumab Alone versus Combined with Macular Photocoagulation in Diabetic Macular Edema
title_full_unstemmed Intravitreal Bevacizumab Alone versus Combined with Macular Photocoagulation in Diabetic Macular Edema
title_short Intravitreal Bevacizumab Alone versus Combined with Macular Photocoagulation in Diabetic Macular Edema
title_sort intravitreal bevacizumab alone versus combined with macular photocoagulation in diabetic macular edema
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3178762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21976935
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2011.25.5.299
work_keys_str_mv AT leesoojeong intravitrealbevacizumabaloneversuscombinedwithmacularphotocoagulationindiabeticmacularedema
AT kimeitae intravitrealbevacizumabaloneversuscombinedwithmacularphotocoagulationindiabeticmacularedema
AT moonyeonsung intravitrealbevacizumabaloneversuscombinedwithmacularphotocoagulationindiabeticmacularedema