Cargando…

Polarity-Dependent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Central Auditory Processing

Given the polarity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in facilitating or inhibiting neuronal processing, and tDCS effects on pitch perception, we tested the effects of tDCS on temporal aspects of auditory processing. We aimed to change baseline activity of the audito...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ladeira, Andrea, Fregni, Felipe, Campanhã, Camila, Valasek, Cláudia Aparecida, De Ridder, Dirk, Brunoni, André Russwsky, Boggio, Paulo Sérgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21966519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025399
_version_ 1782212532373553152
author Ladeira, Andrea
Fregni, Felipe
Campanhã, Camila
Valasek, Cláudia Aparecida
De Ridder, Dirk
Brunoni, André Russwsky
Boggio, Paulo Sérgio
author_facet Ladeira, Andrea
Fregni, Felipe
Campanhã, Camila
Valasek, Cláudia Aparecida
De Ridder, Dirk
Brunoni, André Russwsky
Boggio, Paulo Sérgio
author_sort Ladeira, Andrea
collection PubMed
description Given the polarity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in facilitating or inhibiting neuronal processing, and tDCS effects on pitch perception, we tested the effects of tDCS on temporal aspects of auditory processing. We aimed to change baseline activity of the auditory cortex using tDCS as to modulate temporal aspects of auditory processing in healthy subjects without hearing impairment. Eleven subjects received 2mA bilateral anodal, cathodal and sham tDCS over auditory cortex in a randomized and counterbalanced order. Subjects were evaluated by the Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT), a test measuring temporal processing abilities in the auditory domain, before and during the stimulation. Statistical analysis revealed a significant interaction effect of time vs. tDCS condition for 4000 Hz and for clicks. Post-hoc tests showed significant differences according to stimulation polarity on RGDT performance: anodal improved 22.5% and cathodal decreased 54.5% subjects' performance, as compared to baseline. For clicks, anodal also increased performance in 29.4% when compared to baseline. tDCS presented polarity-dependent effects on the activity of the auditory cortex, which results in a positive or negative impact in a temporal resolution task performance. These results encourage further studies exploring tDCS in central auditory processing disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3179516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31795162011-09-30 Polarity-Dependent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Central Auditory Processing Ladeira, Andrea Fregni, Felipe Campanhã, Camila Valasek, Cláudia Aparecida De Ridder, Dirk Brunoni, André Russwsky Boggio, Paulo Sérgio PLoS One Research Article Given the polarity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in facilitating or inhibiting neuronal processing, and tDCS effects on pitch perception, we tested the effects of tDCS on temporal aspects of auditory processing. We aimed to change baseline activity of the auditory cortex using tDCS as to modulate temporal aspects of auditory processing in healthy subjects without hearing impairment. Eleven subjects received 2mA bilateral anodal, cathodal and sham tDCS over auditory cortex in a randomized and counterbalanced order. Subjects were evaluated by the Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT), a test measuring temporal processing abilities in the auditory domain, before and during the stimulation. Statistical analysis revealed a significant interaction effect of time vs. tDCS condition for 4000 Hz and for clicks. Post-hoc tests showed significant differences according to stimulation polarity on RGDT performance: anodal improved 22.5% and cathodal decreased 54.5% subjects' performance, as compared to baseline. For clicks, anodal also increased performance in 29.4% when compared to baseline. tDCS presented polarity-dependent effects on the activity of the auditory cortex, which results in a positive or negative impact in a temporal resolution task performance. These results encourage further studies exploring tDCS in central auditory processing disorders. Public Library of Science 2011-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3179516/ /pubmed/21966519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025399 Text en Ladeira et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ladeira, Andrea
Fregni, Felipe
Campanhã, Camila
Valasek, Cláudia Aparecida
De Ridder, Dirk
Brunoni, André Russwsky
Boggio, Paulo Sérgio
Polarity-Dependent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Central Auditory Processing
title Polarity-Dependent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Central Auditory Processing
title_full Polarity-Dependent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Central Auditory Processing
title_fullStr Polarity-Dependent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Central Auditory Processing
title_full_unstemmed Polarity-Dependent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Central Auditory Processing
title_short Polarity-Dependent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Central Auditory Processing
title_sort polarity-dependent transcranial direct current stimulation effects on central auditory processing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21966519
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025399
work_keys_str_mv AT ladeiraandrea polaritydependenttranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationeffectsoncentralauditoryprocessing
AT fregnifelipe polaritydependenttranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationeffectsoncentralauditoryprocessing
AT campanhacamila polaritydependenttranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationeffectsoncentralauditoryprocessing
AT valasekclaudiaaparecida polaritydependenttranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationeffectsoncentralauditoryprocessing
AT deridderdirk polaritydependenttranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationeffectsoncentralauditoryprocessing
AT brunoniandrerusswsky polaritydependenttranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationeffectsoncentralauditoryprocessing
AT boggiopaulosergio polaritydependenttranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationeffectsoncentralauditoryprocessing