Cargando…
Polarity-Dependent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Central Auditory Processing
Given the polarity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in facilitating or inhibiting neuronal processing, and tDCS effects on pitch perception, we tested the effects of tDCS on temporal aspects of auditory processing. We aimed to change baseline activity of the audito...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21966519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025399 |
_version_ | 1782212532373553152 |
---|---|
author | Ladeira, Andrea Fregni, Felipe Campanhã, Camila Valasek, Cláudia Aparecida De Ridder, Dirk Brunoni, André Russwsky Boggio, Paulo Sérgio |
author_facet | Ladeira, Andrea Fregni, Felipe Campanhã, Camila Valasek, Cláudia Aparecida De Ridder, Dirk Brunoni, André Russwsky Boggio, Paulo Sérgio |
author_sort | Ladeira, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | Given the polarity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in facilitating or inhibiting neuronal processing, and tDCS effects on pitch perception, we tested the effects of tDCS on temporal aspects of auditory processing. We aimed to change baseline activity of the auditory cortex using tDCS as to modulate temporal aspects of auditory processing in healthy subjects without hearing impairment. Eleven subjects received 2mA bilateral anodal, cathodal and sham tDCS over auditory cortex in a randomized and counterbalanced order. Subjects were evaluated by the Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT), a test measuring temporal processing abilities in the auditory domain, before and during the stimulation. Statistical analysis revealed a significant interaction effect of time vs. tDCS condition for 4000 Hz and for clicks. Post-hoc tests showed significant differences according to stimulation polarity on RGDT performance: anodal improved 22.5% and cathodal decreased 54.5% subjects' performance, as compared to baseline. For clicks, anodal also increased performance in 29.4% when compared to baseline. tDCS presented polarity-dependent effects on the activity of the auditory cortex, which results in a positive or negative impact in a temporal resolution task performance. These results encourage further studies exploring tDCS in central auditory processing disorders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3179516 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31795162011-09-30 Polarity-Dependent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Central Auditory Processing Ladeira, Andrea Fregni, Felipe Campanhã, Camila Valasek, Cláudia Aparecida De Ridder, Dirk Brunoni, André Russwsky Boggio, Paulo Sérgio PLoS One Research Article Given the polarity dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in facilitating or inhibiting neuronal processing, and tDCS effects on pitch perception, we tested the effects of tDCS on temporal aspects of auditory processing. We aimed to change baseline activity of the auditory cortex using tDCS as to modulate temporal aspects of auditory processing in healthy subjects without hearing impairment. Eleven subjects received 2mA bilateral anodal, cathodal and sham tDCS over auditory cortex in a randomized and counterbalanced order. Subjects were evaluated by the Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT), a test measuring temporal processing abilities in the auditory domain, before and during the stimulation. Statistical analysis revealed a significant interaction effect of time vs. tDCS condition for 4000 Hz and for clicks. Post-hoc tests showed significant differences according to stimulation polarity on RGDT performance: anodal improved 22.5% and cathodal decreased 54.5% subjects' performance, as compared to baseline. For clicks, anodal also increased performance in 29.4% when compared to baseline. tDCS presented polarity-dependent effects on the activity of the auditory cortex, which results in a positive or negative impact in a temporal resolution task performance. These results encourage further studies exploring tDCS in central auditory processing disorders. Public Library of Science 2011-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3179516/ /pubmed/21966519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025399 Text en Ladeira et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ladeira, Andrea Fregni, Felipe Campanhã, Camila Valasek, Cláudia Aparecida De Ridder, Dirk Brunoni, André Russwsky Boggio, Paulo Sérgio Polarity-Dependent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Central Auditory Processing |
title | Polarity-Dependent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Central Auditory Processing |
title_full | Polarity-Dependent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Central Auditory Processing |
title_fullStr | Polarity-Dependent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Central Auditory Processing |
title_full_unstemmed | Polarity-Dependent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Central Auditory Processing |
title_short | Polarity-Dependent Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Central Auditory Processing |
title_sort | polarity-dependent transcranial direct current stimulation effects on central auditory processing |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21966519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025399 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ladeiraandrea polaritydependenttranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationeffectsoncentralauditoryprocessing AT fregnifelipe polaritydependenttranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationeffectsoncentralauditoryprocessing AT campanhacamila polaritydependenttranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationeffectsoncentralauditoryprocessing AT valasekclaudiaaparecida polaritydependenttranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationeffectsoncentralauditoryprocessing AT deridderdirk polaritydependenttranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationeffectsoncentralauditoryprocessing AT brunoniandrerusswsky polaritydependenttranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationeffectsoncentralauditoryprocessing AT boggiopaulosergio polaritydependenttranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationeffectsoncentralauditoryprocessing |