Cargando…
A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns
BACKGROUND: During the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination campaign, health regions in Canada collected client-level immunization data using fully electronic or hybrid systems, with the latter comprising both electronic and paper-based elements. The objective of our evaluation was to compare...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21880158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-210 |
_version_ | 1782212543267209216 |
---|---|
author | Pereira, Jennifer A Foisy, Julie Kwong, Jeffrey C Heidebrecht, Christine L Quach, Susan Quan, Sherman D Guay, Maryse Sander, Beate |
author_facet | Pereira, Jennifer A Foisy, Julie Kwong, Jeffrey C Heidebrecht, Christine L Quach, Susan Quan, Sherman D Guay, Maryse Sander, Beate |
author_sort | Pereira, Jennifer A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination campaign, health regions in Canada collected client-level immunization data using fully electronic or hybrid systems, with the latter comprising both electronic and paper-based elements. The objective of our evaluation was to compare projected five-year costs associated with implementing these systems in Ontario public health units (PHUs) during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns. METHODS: Six PHUs provided equipment and staffing costs during the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination campaign and staffing algorithms for seasonal campaigns. We standardized resources to population sizes 100,000, 500,000 and 1,000,000, assuming equipment lifetime of five years and public health vaccine administration rates of 18% and 2.5% for H1N1 and seasonal campaigns, respectively. Two scenarios were considered: Year 1 pandemic and Year 1 seasonal campaigns, each followed by four regular influenza seasons. Costs were discounted at 5%. RESULTS: Assuming a Year 1 pandemic, the five-year costs per capita for the electronic system decrease as PHU population size increases, becoming increasingly less costly than hybrid systems ($4.33 vs. $4.34 [100,000], $4.17 vs. $4.34 [500,000], $4.12 vs. $4.34 [1,000, 000]). The same trend is observed for the scenario reflecting five seasonal campaigns, with the electronic system being less expensive per capita than the hybrid system for all population sizes ($1.93 vs. $1.95 [100,000], $1.91 vs. $1.94 [500,000], $1.87 vs. $1.94 [1,000, 000]). Sensitivity analyses identified factors related to nurse hours as affecting the direction and magnitude of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Five-year cost projections for electronic systems were comparable or less expensive than for hybrid systems, at all PHU population sizes. An intangible benefit of the electronic system is having data rapidly available for reporting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3179703 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31797032011-09-25 A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns Pereira, Jennifer A Foisy, Julie Kwong, Jeffrey C Heidebrecht, Christine L Quach, Susan Quan, Sherman D Guay, Maryse Sander, Beate BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: During the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination campaign, health regions in Canada collected client-level immunization data using fully electronic or hybrid systems, with the latter comprising both electronic and paper-based elements. The objective of our evaluation was to compare projected five-year costs associated with implementing these systems in Ontario public health units (PHUs) during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns. METHODS: Six PHUs provided equipment and staffing costs during the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination campaign and staffing algorithms for seasonal campaigns. We standardized resources to population sizes 100,000, 500,000 and 1,000,000, assuming equipment lifetime of five years and public health vaccine administration rates of 18% and 2.5% for H1N1 and seasonal campaigns, respectively. Two scenarios were considered: Year 1 pandemic and Year 1 seasonal campaigns, each followed by four regular influenza seasons. Costs were discounted at 5%. RESULTS: Assuming a Year 1 pandemic, the five-year costs per capita for the electronic system decrease as PHU population size increases, becoming increasingly less costly than hybrid systems ($4.33 vs. $4.34 [100,000], $4.17 vs. $4.34 [500,000], $4.12 vs. $4.34 [1,000, 000]). The same trend is observed for the scenario reflecting five seasonal campaigns, with the electronic system being less expensive per capita than the hybrid system for all population sizes ($1.93 vs. $1.95 [100,000], $1.91 vs. $1.94 [500,000], $1.87 vs. $1.94 [1,000, 000]). Sensitivity analyses identified factors related to nurse hours as affecting the direction and magnitude of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Five-year cost projections for electronic systems were comparable or less expensive than for hybrid systems, at all PHU population sizes. An intangible benefit of the electronic system is having data rapidly available for reporting. BioMed Central 2011-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3179703/ /pubmed/21880158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-210 Text en Copyright ©2011 Pereira et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pereira, Jennifer A Foisy, Julie Kwong, Jeffrey C Heidebrecht, Christine L Quach, Susan Quan, Sherman D Guay, Maryse Sander, Beate A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns |
title | A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns |
title_full | A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns |
title_fullStr | A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns |
title_full_unstemmed | A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns |
title_short | A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns |
title_sort | cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21880158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pereirajennifera acostcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns AT foisyjulie acostcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns AT kwongjeffreyc acostcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns AT heidebrechtchristinel acostcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns AT quachsusan acostcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns AT quanshermand acostcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns AT guaymaryse acostcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns AT sanderbeate acostcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns AT pereirajennifera costcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns AT foisyjulie costcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns AT kwongjeffreyc costcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns AT heidebrechtchristinel costcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns AT quachsusan costcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns AT quanshermand costcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns AT guaymaryse costcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns AT sanderbeate costcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns |