Cargando…

A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns

BACKGROUND: During the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination campaign, health regions in Canada collected client-level immunization data using fully electronic or hybrid systems, with the latter comprising both electronic and paper-based elements. The objective of our evaluation was to compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pereira, Jennifer A, Foisy, Julie, Kwong, Jeffrey C, Heidebrecht, Christine L, Quach, Susan, Quan, Sherman D, Guay, Maryse, Sander, Beate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21880158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-210
_version_ 1782212543267209216
author Pereira, Jennifer A
Foisy, Julie
Kwong, Jeffrey C
Heidebrecht, Christine L
Quach, Susan
Quan, Sherman D
Guay, Maryse
Sander, Beate
author_facet Pereira, Jennifer A
Foisy, Julie
Kwong, Jeffrey C
Heidebrecht, Christine L
Quach, Susan
Quan, Sherman D
Guay, Maryse
Sander, Beate
author_sort Pereira, Jennifer A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination campaign, health regions in Canada collected client-level immunization data using fully electronic or hybrid systems, with the latter comprising both electronic and paper-based elements. The objective of our evaluation was to compare projected five-year costs associated with implementing these systems in Ontario public health units (PHUs) during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns. METHODS: Six PHUs provided equipment and staffing costs during the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination campaign and staffing algorithms for seasonal campaigns. We standardized resources to population sizes 100,000, 500,000 and 1,000,000, assuming equipment lifetime of five years and public health vaccine administration rates of 18% and 2.5% for H1N1 and seasonal campaigns, respectively. Two scenarios were considered: Year 1 pandemic and Year 1 seasonal campaigns, each followed by four regular influenza seasons. Costs were discounted at 5%. RESULTS: Assuming a Year 1 pandemic, the five-year costs per capita for the electronic system decrease as PHU population size increases, becoming increasingly less costly than hybrid systems ($4.33 vs. $4.34 [100,000], $4.17 vs. $4.34 [500,000], $4.12 vs. $4.34 [1,000, 000]). The same trend is observed for the scenario reflecting five seasonal campaigns, with the electronic system being less expensive per capita than the hybrid system for all population sizes ($1.93 vs. $1.95 [100,000], $1.91 vs. $1.94 [500,000], $1.87 vs. $1.94 [1,000, 000]). Sensitivity analyses identified factors related to nurse hours as affecting the direction and magnitude of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Five-year cost projections for electronic systems were comparable or less expensive than for hybrid systems, at all PHU population sizes. An intangible benefit of the electronic system is having data rapidly available for reporting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3179703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31797032011-09-25 A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns Pereira, Jennifer A Foisy, Julie Kwong, Jeffrey C Heidebrecht, Christine L Quach, Susan Quan, Sherman D Guay, Maryse Sander, Beate BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: During the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination campaign, health regions in Canada collected client-level immunization data using fully electronic or hybrid systems, with the latter comprising both electronic and paper-based elements. The objective of our evaluation was to compare projected five-year costs associated with implementing these systems in Ontario public health units (PHUs) during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns. METHODS: Six PHUs provided equipment and staffing costs during the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 influenza vaccination campaign and staffing algorithms for seasonal campaigns. We standardized resources to population sizes 100,000, 500,000 and 1,000,000, assuming equipment lifetime of five years and public health vaccine administration rates of 18% and 2.5% for H1N1 and seasonal campaigns, respectively. Two scenarios were considered: Year 1 pandemic and Year 1 seasonal campaigns, each followed by four regular influenza seasons. Costs were discounted at 5%. RESULTS: Assuming a Year 1 pandemic, the five-year costs per capita for the electronic system decrease as PHU population size increases, becoming increasingly less costly than hybrid systems ($4.33 vs. $4.34 [100,000], $4.17 vs. $4.34 [500,000], $4.12 vs. $4.34 [1,000, 000]). The same trend is observed for the scenario reflecting five seasonal campaigns, with the electronic system being less expensive per capita than the hybrid system for all population sizes ($1.93 vs. $1.95 [100,000], $1.91 vs. $1.94 [500,000], $1.87 vs. $1.94 [1,000, 000]). Sensitivity analyses identified factors related to nurse hours as affecting the direction and magnitude of the results. CONCLUSIONS: Five-year cost projections for electronic systems were comparable or less expensive than for hybrid systems, at all PHU population sizes. An intangible benefit of the electronic system is having data rapidly available for reporting. BioMed Central 2011-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3179703/ /pubmed/21880158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-210 Text en Copyright ©2011 Pereira et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pereira, Jennifer A
Foisy, Julie
Kwong, Jeffrey C
Heidebrecht, Christine L
Quach, Susan
Quan, Sherman D
Guay, Maryse
Sander, Beate
A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns
title A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns
title_full A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns
title_fullStr A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns
title_full_unstemmed A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns
title_short A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns
title_sort cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21880158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-210
work_keys_str_mv AT pereirajennifera acostcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns
AT foisyjulie acostcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns
AT kwongjeffreyc acostcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns
AT heidebrechtchristinel acostcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns
AT quachsusan acostcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns
AT quanshermand acostcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns
AT guaymaryse acostcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns
AT sanderbeate acostcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns
AT pereirajennifera costcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns
AT foisyjulie costcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns
AT kwongjeffreyc costcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns
AT heidebrechtchristinel costcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns
AT quachsusan costcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns
AT quanshermand costcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns
AT guaymaryse costcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns
AT sanderbeate costcomparisonofelectronicandhybriddatacollectionsystemsinontarioduringpandemicandseasonalinfluenzavaccinationcampaigns