Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are low in many areas and cost-effective interventions to promote CRC screening are needed. Recently in a randomized controlled trial, a mailed educational reminder increased CRC screening rates by 16.2% among U.S. Veterans. The aim of our study wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jeffrey K, Groessl, Erik J, Ganiats, Theodore G, Ho, Samuel B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21867492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-11-93
_version_ 1782212570117046272
author Lee, Jeffrey K
Groessl, Erik J
Ganiats, Theodore G
Ho, Samuel B
author_facet Lee, Jeffrey K
Groessl, Erik J
Ganiats, Theodore G
Ho, Samuel B
author_sort Lee, Jeffrey K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are low in many areas and cost-effective interventions to promote CRC screening are needed. Recently in a randomized controlled trial, a mailed educational reminder increased CRC screening rates by 16.2% among U.S. Veterans. The aim of our study was to assess the costs and cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder on fecal occult blood test (FOBT) adherence. METHODS: In a blinded, randomized, controlled trial, 769 patients were randomly assigned to the usual care group (FOBT alone, n = 382) or the intervention group (FOBT plus a mailed reminder, n = 387). Ten days after picking up the FOBT cards, a 1-page reminder with information related to CRC screening was mailed to the intervention group. Primary outcome was number of returned FOBT cards after 6 months. The costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the intervention were assessed and calculated respectively. Sensitivity analyses were based on varying costs of labor and supplies. RESULTS: At 6 months after card distribution, 64.6% patients in the intervention group returned FOBT cards compared with 48.4% in the control group (P < 0.001). The total cost of the intervention was $962 or $2.49 per patient, and the ICER was $15 per additional person screened for CRC. Sensitivity analysis based on a 10% cost variation was $13.50 to $16.50 per additional patient screened for CRC. CONCLUSIONS: A simple mailed educational reminder increases FOBT card return rate at a cost many health care systems can afford. Compared to other patient-directed interventions (telephone, letters from physicians, mailed reminders) for CRC screening, our intervention was more effective and cost-effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3179931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31799312011-09-26 Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening Lee, Jeffrey K Groessl, Erik J Ganiats, Theodore G Ho, Samuel B BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are low in many areas and cost-effective interventions to promote CRC screening are needed. Recently in a randomized controlled trial, a mailed educational reminder increased CRC screening rates by 16.2% among U.S. Veterans. The aim of our study was to assess the costs and cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder on fecal occult blood test (FOBT) adherence. METHODS: In a blinded, randomized, controlled trial, 769 patients were randomly assigned to the usual care group (FOBT alone, n = 382) or the intervention group (FOBT plus a mailed reminder, n = 387). Ten days after picking up the FOBT cards, a 1-page reminder with information related to CRC screening was mailed to the intervention group. Primary outcome was number of returned FOBT cards after 6 months. The costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the intervention were assessed and calculated respectively. Sensitivity analyses were based on varying costs of labor and supplies. RESULTS: At 6 months after card distribution, 64.6% patients in the intervention group returned FOBT cards compared with 48.4% in the control group (P < 0.001). The total cost of the intervention was $962 or $2.49 per patient, and the ICER was $15 per additional person screened for CRC. Sensitivity analysis based on a 10% cost variation was $13.50 to $16.50 per additional patient screened for CRC. CONCLUSIONS: A simple mailed educational reminder increases FOBT card return rate at a cost many health care systems can afford. Compared to other patient-directed interventions (telephone, letters from physicians, mailed reminders) for CRC screening, our intervention was more effective and cost-effective. BioMed Central 2011-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3179931/ /pubmed/21867492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-11-93 Text en Copyright ©2011 Lee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Jeffrey K
Groessl, Erik J
Ganiats, Theodore G
Ho, Samuel B
Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening
title Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening
title_full Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening
title_short Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening
title_sort cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21867492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-11-93
work_keys_str_mv AT leejeffreyk costeffectivenessofamailededucationalremindertoincreasecolorectalcancerscreening
AT groesslerikj costeffectivenessofamailededucationalremindertoincreasecolorectalcancerscreening
AT ganiatstheodoreg costeffectivenessofamailededucationalremindertoincreasecolorectalcancerscreening
AT hosamuelb costeffectivenessofamailededucationalremindertoincreasecolorectalcancerscreening