Cargando…
Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are low in many areas and cost-effective interventions to promote CRC screening are needed. Recently in a randomized controlled trial, a mailed educational reminder increased CRC screening rates by 16.2% among U.S. Veterans. The aim of our study wa...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21867492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-11-93 |
_version_ | 1782212570117046272 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Jeffrey K Groessl, Erik J Ganiats, Theodore G Ho, Samuel B |
author_facet | Lee, Jeffrey K Groessl, Erik J Ganiats, Theodore G Ho, Samuel B |
author_sort | Lee, Jeffrey K |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are low in many areas and cost-effective interventions to promote CRC screening are needed. Recently in a randomized controlled trial, a mailed educational reminder increased CRC screening rates by 16.2% among U.S. Veterans. The aim of our study was to assess the costs and cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder on fecal occult blood test (FOBT) adherence. METHODS: In a blinded, randomized, controlled trial, 769 patients were randomly assigned to the usual care group (FOBT alone, n = 382) or the intervention group (FOBT plus a mailed reminder, n = 387). Ten days after picking up the FOBT cards, a 1-page reminder with information related to CRC screening was mailed to the intervention group. Primary outcome was number of returned FOBT cards after 6 months. The costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the intervention were assessed and calculated respectively. Sensitivity analyses were based on varying costs of labor and supplies. RESULTS: At 6 months after card distribution, 64.6% patients in the intervention group returned FOBT cards compared with 48.4% in the control group (P < 0.001). The total cost of the intervention was $962 or $2.49 per patient, and the ICER was $15 per additional person screened for CRC. Sensitivity analysis based on a 10% cost variation was $13.50 to $16.50 per additional patient screened for CRC. CONCLUSIONS: A simple mailed educational reminder increases FOBT card return rate at a cost many health care systems can afford. Compared to other patient-directed interventions (telephone, letters from physicians, mailed reminders) for CRC screening, our intervention was more effective and cost-effective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3179931 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-31799312011-09-26 Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening Lee, Jeffrey K Groessl, Erik J Ganiats, Theodore G Ho, Samuel B BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are low in many areas and cost-effective interventions to promote CRC screening are needed. Recently in a randomized controlled trial, a mailed educational reminder increased CRC screening rates by 16.2% among U.S. Veterans. The aim of our study was to assess the costs and cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder on fecal occult blood test (FOBT) adherence. METHODS: In a blinded, randomized, controlled trial, 769 patients were randomly assigned to the usual care group (FOBT alone, n = 382) or the intervention group (FOBT plus a mailed reminder, n = 387). Ten days after picking up the FOBT cards, a 1-page reminder with information related to CRC screening was mailed to the intervention group. Primary outcome was number of returned FOBT cards after 6 months. The costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the intervention were assessed and calculated respectively. Sensitivity analyses were based on varying costs of labor and supplies. RESULTS: At 6 months after card distribution, 64.6% patients in the intervention group returned FOBT cards compared with 48.4% in the control group (P < 0.001). The total cost of the intervention was $962 or $2.49 per patient, and the ICER was $15 per additional person screened for CRC. Sensitivity analysis based on a 10% cost variation was $13.50 to $16.50 per additional patient screened for CRC. CONCLUSIONS: A simple mailed educational reminder increases FOBT card return rate at a cost many health care systems can afford. Compared to other patient-directed interventions (telephone, letters from physicians, mailed reminders) for CRC screening, our intervention was more effective and cost-effective. BioMed Central 2011-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3179931/ /pubmed/21867492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-11-93 Text en Copyright ©2011 Lee et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lee, Jeffrey K Groessl, Erik J Ganiats, Theodore G Ho, Samuel B Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening |
title | Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening |
title_full | Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening |
title_fullStr | Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening |
title_short | Cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of a mailed educational reminder to increase colorectal cancer screening |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3179931/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21867492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-11-93 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejeffreyk costeffectivenessofamailededucationalremindertoincreasecolorectalcancerscreening AT groesslerikj costeffectivenessofamailededucationalremindertoincreasecolorectalcancerscreening AT ganiatstheodoreg costeffectivenessofamailededucationalremindertoincreasecolorectalcancerscreening AT hosamuelb costeffectivenessofamailededucationalremindertoincreasecolorectalcancerscreening |