Cargando…

Does Compound I Vary Significantly between Isoforms of Cytochrome P450?

[Image: see text] The cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes are important in many areas, including pharmaceutical development. Subtle changes in the electronic structure of the active species, Compound I, have been postulated previously to account partly for the experimentally observed differences in reacti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lonsdale, Richard, Oláh, Julianna, Mulholland, Adrian J., Harvey, Jeremy N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2011
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21863858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja203157u
_version_ 1782212594509021184
author Lonsdale, Richard
Oláh, Julianna
Mulholland, Adrian J.
Harvey, Jeremy N.
author_facet Lonsdale, Richard
Oláh, Julianna
Mulholland, Adrian J.
Harvey, Jeremy N.
author_sort Lonsdale, Richard
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes are important in many areas, including pharmaceutical development. Subtle changes in the electronic structure of the active species, Compound I, have been postulated previously to account partly for the experimentally observed differences in reactivity between isoforms. Current predictive models of CYP metabolism typically assume an identical Compound I in all isoforms. Here we present a method to calculate the electronic structure and to estimate the Fe–O bond enthalpy of Compound I, and apply it to several human and bacterial CYP isoforms. Conformational flexibility is accounted for by sampling large numbers of structures from molecular dynamics simulations, which are subsequently optimized with density functional theory (B3LYP) based quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics. The observed differences in Compound I between human isoforms are small: They are generally smaller than the spread of values obtained for the same isoform starting from different initial structures. Hence, it is unlikely that the variation in activity between human isoforms is due to differences in the electronic structure of Compound I. A larger difference in electronic structure is observed between the human isoforms and P450(cam) and may be explained by the slightly different hydrogen-bonding environment surrounding the cysteinyl sulfur. The presence of substrate in the active site of all isoforms studied appears to cause a slight decrease in the Fe–O bond enthalpy, apparently due to displacement of water out of the active site, suggesting that Compound I is less stable in the presence of substrate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3180200
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31802002011-09-26 Does Compound I Vary Significantly between Isoforms of Cytochrome P450? Lonsdale, Richard Oláh, Julianna Mulholland, Adrian J. Harvey, Jeremy N. J Am Chem Soc [Image: see text] The cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes are important in many areas, including pharmaceutical development. Subtle changes in the electronic structure of the active species, Compound I, have been postulated previously to account partly for the experimentally observed differences in reactivity between isoforms. Current predictive models of CYP metabolism typically assume an identical Compound I in all isoforms. Here we present a method to calculate the electronic structure and to estimate the Fe–O bond enthalpy of Compound I, and apply it to several human and bacterial CYP isoforms. Conformational flexibility is accounted for by sampling large numbers of structures from molecular dynamics simulations, which are subsequently optimized with density functional theory (B3LYP) based quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics. The observed differences in Compound I between human isoforms are small: They are generally smaller than the spread of values obtained for the same isoform starting from different initial structures. Hence, it is unlikely that the variation in activity between human isoforms is due to differences in the electronic structure of Compound I. A larger difference in electronic structure is observed between the human isoforms and P450(cam) and may be explained by the slightly different hydrogen-bonding environment surrounding the cysteinyl sulfur. The presence of substrate in the active site of all isoforms studied appears to cause a slight decrease in the Fe–O bond enthalpy, apparently due to displacement of water out of the active site, suggesting that Compound I is less stable in the presence of substrate. American Chemical Society 2011-08-24 2011-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3180200/ /pubmed/21863858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja203157u Text en Copyright © 2011 American Chemical Society http://pubs.acs.org This is an open-access article distributed under the ACS AuthorChoice Terms & Conditions. Any use of this article, must conform to the terms of that license which are available at http://pubs.acs.org.
spellingShingle Lonsdale, Richard
Oláh, Julianna
Mulholland, Adrian J.
Harvey, Jeremy N.
Does Compound I Vary Significantly between Isoforms of Cytochrome P450?
title Does Compound I Vary Significantly between Isoforms of Cytochrome P450?
title_full Does Compound I Vary Significantly between Isoforms of Cytochrome P450?
title_fullStr Does Compound I Vary Significantly between Isoforms of Cytochrome P450?
title_full_unstemmed Does Compound I Vary Significantly between Isoforms of Cytochrome P450?
title_short Does Compound I Vary Significantly between Isoforms of Cytochrome P450?
title_sort does compound i vary significantly between isoforms of cytochrome p450?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21863858
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja203157u
work_keys_str_mv AT lonsdalerichard doescompoundivarysignificantlybetweenisoformsofcytochromep450
AT olahjulianna doescompoundivarysignificantlybetweenisoformsofcytochromep450
AT mulhollandadrianj doescompoundivarysignificantlybetweenisoformsofcytochromep450
AT harveyjeremyn doescompoundivarysignificantlybetweenisoformsofcytochromep450