Cargando…

High incidence of medication documentation errors in a Swiss university hospital due to the handwritten prescription process

BACKGROUND: Medication errors have been reported to be a leading cause of death in hospitalized patients. In this study we focused on identifying and quantifying errors in the handwritten drug ordering and dispensing documentation processes which could possibly lead to adverse drug events. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hartel, Maximilian J, Staub, Lukas P, Röder, Christoph, Eggli, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21851620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-199
_version_ 1782212618475274240
author Hartel, Maximilian J
Staub, Lukas P
Röder, Christoph
Eggli, Stefan
author_facet Hartel, Maximilian J
Staub, Lukas P
Röder, Christoph
Eggli, Stefan
author_sort Hartel, Maximilian J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medication errors have been reported to be a leading cause of death in hospitalized patients. In this study we focused on identifying and quantifying errors in the handwritten drug ordering and dispensing documentation processes which could possibly lead to adverse drug events. METHODS: We studied 1,934 ordered agents (165 consecutive patients) retrospectively for medication documentation errors. Errors were categorized into: Prescribing errors, transcription errors and administration documentation errors on the nurses' medication lists. The legibility of prescriptions was analyzed to explore its possible influence on the error rate in the documentation process. RESULTS: Documentation errors occurred in 65 of 1,934 prescribed agents (3.5%). The incidence of patient charts showing at least one error was 43%. Prescribing errors were found 39 times (37%), transcription errors 56 times (53%), and administration documentation errors 10 times (10%). The handwriting readability was rated as good in 2%, moderate in 42%, bad in 52%, and unreadable in 4%. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a high incidence of documentation errors in the traditional handwritten prescription process. Most errors occurred when prescriptions were transcribed into the patients' chart. The readability of the handwritten prescriptions was generally bad. Replacing the traditional handwritten documentation process with information technology could potentially improve the safety in the medication process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3180357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-31803572011-09-27 High incidence of medication documentation errors in a Swiss university hospital due to the handwritten prescription process Hartel, Maximilian J Staub, Lukas P Röder, Christoph Eggli, Stefan BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Medication errors have been reported to be a leading cause of death in hospitalized patients. In this study we focused on identifying and quantifying errors in the handwritten drug ordering and dispensing documentation processes which could possibly lead to adverse drug events. METHODS: We studied 1,934 ordered agents (165 consecutive patients) retrospectively for medication documentation errors. Errors were categorized into: Prescribing errors, transcription errors and administration documentation errors on the nurses' medication lists. The legibility of prescriptions was analyzed to explore its possible influence on the error rate in the documentation process. RESULTS: Documentation errors occurred in 65 of 1,934 prescribed agents (3.5%). The incidence of patient charts showing at least one error was 43%. Prescribing errors were found 39 times (37%), transcription errors 56 times (53%), and administration documentation errors 10 times (10%). The handwriting readability was rated as good in 2%, moderate in 42%, bad in 52%, and unreadable in 4%. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a high incidence of documentation errors in the traditional handwritten prescription process. Most errors occurred when prescriptions were transcribed into the patients' chart. The readability of the handwritten prescriptions was generally bad. Replacing the traditional handwritten documentation process with information technology could potentially improve the safety in the medication process. BioMed Central 2011-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3180357/ /pubmed/21851620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-199 Text en Copyright ©2011 Hartel et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hartel, Maximilian J
Staub, Lukas P
Röder, Christoph
Eggli, Stefan
High incidence of medication documentation errors in a Swiss university hospital due to the handwritten prescription process
title High incidence of medication documentation errors in a Swiss university hospital due to the handwritten prescription process
title_full High incidence of medication documentation errors in a Swiss university hospital due to the handwritten prescription process
title_fullStr High incidence of medication documentation errors in a Swiss university hospital due to the handwritten prescription process
title_full_unstemmed High incidence of medication documentation errors in a Swiss university hospital due to the handwritten prescription process
title_short High incidence of medication documentation errors in a Swiss university hospital due to the handwritten prescription process
title_sort high incidence of medication documentation errors in a swiss university hospital due to the handwritten prescription process
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3180357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21851620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-199
work_keys_str_mv AT hartelmaximilianj highincidenceofmedicationdocumentationerrorsinaswissuniversityhospitalduetothehandwrittenprescriptionprocess
AT staublukasp highincidenceofmedicationdocumentationerrorsinaswissuniversityhospitalduetothehandwrittenprescriptionprocess
AT roderchristoph highincidenceofmedicationdocumentationerrorsinaswissuniversityhospitalduetothehandwrittenprescriptionprocess
AT egglistefan highincidenceofmedicationdocumentationerrorsinaswissuniversityhospitalduetothehandwrittenprescriptionprocess